Prev: More than 90 percent of objects found in the vast outer–solar system reservoir may have been born around other stars
Next: WHEN BLACK HOLES SLOW DOWN --
From: Greg Neill on 17 Jun 2010 07:25 Brad Guth wrote: > On Jun 15, 4:10 am, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: >> Brad Guth wrote: >>> On Jun 13, 8:05 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: >>>> Brad Guth wrote: >>>>> On Jun 13, 6:10 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> F = m1 m2 G / r^2 >> >>>>>> Calculate the force between the Sirius system and the solar system >>>>>> and let us know what the answer is. >> >>>>>> r = 2.64 0.01 pc >>>>>> m1 = 1.9891 10^30 kg >>>>>> m2 = 5.9628 10^30 kg >> >>>>> http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm >>>>> http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/calculators/gravity-calculator.html >> >>>>> What's next? >> >>>> You haven't answered yet. Give us your numeric >>>> result. >> >>> You're wasting time. Just put everything into a public funded >>> supercomputer and let it run. >> >>> Tell us where that 90% stuff is coming from. >> >> So, you can't do simple calculations. Got it. > > In other words, you don't read or much less utilize anything via > internet. > > Try using a public alternative rather than your private newsreader > that filters everything out. *Still* waiting for your calculation results.
From: palsing on 17 Jun 2010 11:42 On Jun 16, 9:15 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 15, 4:16 am, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: > > The sirius system's speed with respect to the solar > > system is about 18 km/sec. The Sirius system is > > between 200 and 300 million years old. Work out the > > distance. Hint: it's *much* larger than your guess. > > I've already given you the numbers that matter the most. > > Pretending that nothing about the Sirius system was never very massive > or nearby doesn't cut it. > > ~ BG If you had the ability to do the suggested math you would see that the Sirius system was about 15,000 LY's away when it was formed, so the initial mass of the Sirius system is irrelevant. I've told you this before in other posts, but you like to ignore scientific facts, choosing instead to make them up as you go along. The Sirius system is just in the process of passing by, and has no influence whatsoever on our solar system. Just the facts. It is fine to speculate about things, it makes for a lively discussion, but those pesky actual proven facts always need to be taken onto account, even if they require that 'modifications' be made to your ideas. So what? That's the way interactive discussions work, feedback results in modifications, everyone learns something new. \Paul A
From: Brad Guth on 17 Jun 2010 13:29 On Jun 17, 8:42 am, palsing <pnals...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 16, 9:15 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 15, 4:16 am, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: > > > The sirius system's speed with respect to the solar > > > system is about 18 km/sec. The Sirius system is > > > between 200 and 300 million years old. Work out the > > > distance. Hint: it's *much* larger than your guess. > > > I've already given you the numbers that matter the most. > > > Pretending that nothing about the Sirius system was never very massive > > or nearby doesn't cut it. > > > ~ BG > > If you had the ability to do the suggested math you would see that the > Sirius system was about 15,000 LY's away when it was formed, so the > initial mass of the Sirius system is irrelevant. I've told you this > before in other posts, but you like to ignore scientific facts, > choosing instead to make them up as you go along. The Sirius system is > just in the process of passing by, and has no influence whatsoever on > our solar system. Just the facts. > > It is fine to speculate about things, it makes for a lively > discussion, but those pesky actual proven facts always need to be > taken onto account, even if they require that 'modifications' be made > to your ideas. So what? That's the way interactive discussions work, > feedback results in modifications, everyone learns something new. > > \Paul A You purely subjective interpretation that's obfuscation saturated and Semitic approved is noted. Too bad you can't simulate a damn thing, perhaps because that would make you look even more stupid. Even if there's nothing elliptical and the closing velocity of 7.6 km/ sec were a constant, as for going back 300e6 BP is only an added distance of 7.6e3 ly when that molecular cloud of at least 12.5e6 Ms existed. Is either Sirius and/or our sun the only stars in the universe that are purely random and rogue with no interactions whatsoever? (I don't think so) Stars tend to orbit other stars all the freaking time (of all the silly things, it's called a galaxy, or perhaps at least something binary or trinary). Most galaxies are not known as a cluster of purely randomness, as happenstance populated by purely rogue stars going every which way. What exactly is in our galaxy that isn't orbiting something else? ~ BG
From: Brad Guth on 17 Jun 2010 13:31 On Jun 17, 4:25 am, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: > Brad Guth wrote: > > On Jun 15, 4:10 am, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: > >> Brad Guth wrote: > >>> On Jun 13, 8:05 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: > >>>> Brad Guth wrote: > >>>>> On Jun 13, 6:10 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> F = m1 m2 G / r^2 > > >>>>>> Calculate the force between the Sirius system and the solar system > >>>>>> and let us know what the answer is. > > >>>>>> r = 2.64 0.01 pc > >>>>>> m1 = 1.9891 10^30 kg > >>>>>> m2 = 5.9628 10^30 kg > > >>>>>http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm > >>>>>http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/calculators/gravity-calculator.html > > >>>>> What's next? > > >>>> You haven't answered yet. Give us your numeric > >>>> result. > > >>> You're wasting time. Just put everything into a public funded > >>> supercomputer and let it run. > > >>> Tell us where that 90% stuff is coming from. > > >> So, you can't do simple calculations. Got it. > > > In other words, you don't read or much less utilize anything via > > internet. > > > Try using a public alternative rather than your private newsreader > > that filters everything out. > > *Still* waiting for your calculation results. So your internet/Usenet access is blocked. That's not my fault, now is it. ~ BG
From: Greg Neill on 17 Jun 2010 13:38
Brad Guth wrote: > On Jun 17, 4:25 am, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: >> >> *Still* waiting for your calculation results. > > So your internet/Usenet access is blocked. That's not my fault, now > is it. *Still* waiting... |