New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Phat Bytestard on 4 Aug 2006 23:52 On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:58:32 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) Gave us: > On the JSF, the US will be putting up almost all the money for >development Wrong. It is already developed, and THAT was done by a private company using their own dollars.
From: Phat Bytestard on 4 Aug 2006 23:55 On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 08:08:19 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us: >On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:54:45 GMT, Phat Bytestard ><phatbytestard(a)getinmahharddrive.org> wrote: > >>On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:48:55 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us: >> >>>Usenet is an abberation, as it removes the moderating influence of >>>personal contact, body language, intonation, and civility in general. >>>And it selectively attracts jerks. >> >> I fart in your general directions... :-] > >Luckily, it removes foul odors as well. > NONE SHALL PASS!... :-]
From: Phat Bytestard on 4 Aug 2006 23:58 On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 08:29:15 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us: >. It certainly doesn't refer to any international concepts. It does now. Joint allied nations.
From: Phat Bytestard on 5 Aug 2006 00:15 On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:08:57 -0400, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> Gave us: >and JDAM: http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/jdam.htm Heheheh... we say to Iran... "This thud's for you..."
From: Eeyore on 5 Aug 2006 00:25
John Larkin wrote: > On 4 Aug 2006 16:25:48 -0700, bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote: > > >America itself is only fond of democracy as long as it produces > >governments that America finds sympathetic. > > Agreed. They are called "democracies." America has had *no trouble at all* supporting undemocratic countries. That's another reason you're seen as 2 faced. Graham |