New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Phat Bytestard on 4 Aug 2006 23:37 On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:58:24 +0200, "Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> Gave us: >Texas got very well paid for saving England - the phrase "over a barrell" >does come to mind - and the gratitude that Texas can can expect to get over >and above getting paid extortionate prices has to be correspondingly >limited. That won't be the story that they fed you in civics class at >school, but you don't believe in Father Christmas these days, and you should >really outgrow the tales of the benevoltent Uncle Sam. It was much less than $8 a barrel back then, and it was a bargain, considering that we had to ship it over to you. "Extortionate prices" = utter bullshit. It was top quality high end fuel.
From: Phat Bytestard on 4 Aug 2006 23:40 On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:14:03 +0200, "Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> Gave us: >It probably won't be decades before the U.S.A. wakes up from the stupidity >that they have a allowed an extremist neo-con faction to pull. You're an idiot.
From: Phat Bytestard on 4 Aug 2006 23:40 On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:14:03 +0200, "Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> Gave us: >More bogeymen to frighten the electorate into paying for a hugely over-sized >military. Why do you feel the need to spend as much on military expenditure >as the sum total of what next ten nations down the pecking order manage to >spend? Ever get the feeling that you are being ripped off by your >military-industrial complex? You're an idiot.
From: Phat Bytestard on 4 Aug 2006 23:45 On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:34:14 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) Gave us: >In article <44d2c5d1$0$2025$ba620dc5(a)text.nova.planet.nl>, >Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >[....] >>What did you think the "Joint" in the Joint Strike Fighter meant? Weed? > >"Joint" was for joint among the NATO nations You two idiots are meant for each other.
From: Phat Bytestard on 4 Aug 2006 23:51
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:53:07 +0200, "Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> Gave us: >Sure. Repeatedly. It took quite a while before you saw that it was to your >advantage to beat Hitler before Stalin could, and only then - once your >self-interest was fully engaged - did you become the "loyal ally" of the >U.K. Get real. You're a goddamned retard. Get real indeed. Problem is you never will, because you are too far gone. |