Prev: Why html5/proprietary H.264 will fail (was) Scribd "scrappingFlash and betting the company on HTML5"
Next: Airport turns off on reboot
From: Tim McNamara on 7 May 2010 11:43 In article <1ji4t5a.1qwdnv71mqeq07N%dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz>, dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) wrote: > Your Name <your.name(a)isp.com> wrote: > > > In article <Xns9D70C46A4D1F9noonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13>, Larry > > <noone(a)home.com> wrote: > > > > > Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote in news:michelle- > > > 034CAB.12355406052010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi: > > > > > > > I expect that by 2015, there will be something else to replace > > > > H264. > > > > > > By 2015, they'll all be looking back and laughing at the > > > iPhone....like they do the Newton, Palm PIlot, Power book or > > > Pentium II PCs now. > > > > > > iPhone will be long gone by then, replaced by 12G at 480GB/second > > <snip the usual Loser Larry irrelevant and incomprehensible drivel> > > > > The "iPhone" name is likely to be around for a long while, although > > the models will of course be updated over the years. The "iMac" > > name has been around for about 10 years already > > The iMac was introduced 12 years ago this month, though it wasn't > available until August. I bought mine (Rev B) in December 1998. It's still sitting on my desk and runs fine.
From: Jon Ribbens on 7 May 2010 12:17 On 2010-05-07, Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > In article <slrnhu6sfr.f7v.jon+usenet(a)snowy.squish.net>, > Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet(a)unequivocal.co.uk> wrote: >> If it looked fine, it only did so because your newsreader is broken, >> I'm afraid ;-) > > In that case, I suppose I'm glad it's "broken" in this case, since it > actually allowed me to read the message. : ) > > How did it look for you? Chinese, which was the correct way to display it given the headers ;-)
From: Your Name on 7 May 2010 17:27 "Tim McNamara" <timmcn(a)bitstream.net> wrote in message news:timmcn-AF2851.10435807052010(a)news-2.mpls.iphouse.net... > In article <1ji4t5a.1qwdnv71mqeq07N%dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz>, > dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) wrote: > > Your Name <your.name(a)isp.com> wrote: > > > In article <Xns9D70C46A4D1F9noonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13>, Larry > > > <noone(a)home.com> wrote: > > > > Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote in news:michelle- > > > > 034CAB.12355406052010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi: > > > > > > > > > I expect that by 2015, there will be something else to replace > > > > > H264. > > > > > > > > By 2015, they'll all be looking back and laughing at the > > > > iPhone....like they do the Newton, Palm PIlot, Power book or > > > > Pentium II PCs now. > > > > > > > > iPhone will be long gone by then, replaced by 12G at 480GB/second > > > <snip the usual Loser Larry irrelevant and incomprehensible drivel> > > > > > > The "iPhone" name is likely to be around for a long while, although > > > the models will of course be updated over the years. The "iMac" > > > name has been around for about 10 years already > > > > The iMac was introduced 12 years ago this month, though it wasn't > > available until August. > > I bought mine (Rev B) in December 1998. It's still sitting on my desk > and runs fine. My beige G3 PowerMac was bought about July 1998 and is still in daily use for both work and home use (the floppy drive doesn't work, but probably only needs cleaning), as is the Epson printer bought at the same time. :-)
From: Wes Groleau on 7 May 2010 18:46 On 05-06-2010 17:02, Your Name wrote: > Except Wikipedia is full of idiots like him posting nonsense, lies and > rumours as though it is true ... especially for upcoming / unreleased > things. Wikipedia is a waste of server space, as is the similarly > uncontrolled IMDB.com. I can't fully agree. Wikipedia is one place to find links to real stuff. (OTOH, scholar.google.com is better) -- Wes Groleau "Lewis's case for the existence of God is fallacious." "You mean like circular reasoning?" "He believes in God. Therefore, he's fallacious."
From: Your Name on 7 May 2010 19:56
In article <hs257i$ddh$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Groleau+nntp(a)FreeShell.org wrote: > On 05-06-2010 17:02, Your Name wrote: > > Except Wikipedia is full of idiots like him posting nonsense, lies and > > rumours as though it is true ... especially for upcoming / unreleased > > things. Wikipedia is a waste of server space, as is the similarly > > uncontrolled IMDB.com. > > I can't fully agree. Wikipedia is one place to find links to real > stuff. (OTOH, scholar.google.com is better) I'm not saying Wikipedia and IMDB are totally incorrect, but so much of it is rubbish that it's not a trustworthy resource and should NEVER EVER be relied on as a sole source. If you want real information you need to look elsewhere. The Internet Book List (http://www.iblist.com) shows how such a site should be done - the users supply information, but that information is not made live until it has actually been officially checked. Of course every resource will have errors because they compiled by human beings who can make mistakes, but the reliable ones are not used by morons who think it's funny to post utter nonsense as "fact", which unfortunately is far too many people on the Internet (just look at Loser Larry for a "good" example of such an idiot). |