Paul Draper was defeated -and refuses to admit it !!!
in [Relativity]
|
From: Inertial on 28 Mar 2010 19:45 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:f24aeed9-55f1-4d32-8724-b4ae2bb0a931(a)35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On Mar 28, 10:11 am, >> it is in the thread that was** initiated and leaded** by me y.p >> that is called >> A COPYRIGHT QUESTION' >> from 20 Feb 2010 >> but actually it was me that leaded it to look for the smallest photon >> energy >> here is the quote >> it was first said by Ben 699 >> not by Inertial : >> >> quote >> I think that you are just trying to smooth the creation instant and >> change it from a discontinuous event into a continuous one. If you >> imagine that smoothing taking place within that first quantum of time >> in our framework. Ie its transition from creation to moving at speed >> c, then I can't really argue against that (physicists might?) as no >> one really knows what happens within one quantum of time or space. But >> after creation when Maxwell's equation apply, it must be moving at >> speed c for the whole time we know it is travelling in our framework. >> Which is why it is said to be an instantaneous creation. >> >> > 2 >> > we know that E=hf is describing well the amount of energy in big >> > (actually huge number of real units ) quantities >> > many many photons carry >> > yet a gain we dont know what is that >> > 'many many' quantitatively >> >> E=hf applies to a single photon. >> end of quote >> he BEN said it before the monkey thief Inertial >> he said it **just one post before Artful ** !! >> >> anyone can see it in MY thread >> 'A copyright question '' >> from 20 Feb!! >> ------------- >> >> yet still all of the insisted alllalong the many >> threads >> (THAT I Y P INITIATED ) --- >> (and even this very moment >> >> that the definition for the single photon is >> >> hf !!! >> so if Ben is as well Artful !! >> then it was Artful that said it first >> if no >> it is Ben >> and Artful is a Nazi Goebbels lier >> btw >> ( i will keep looking in those thread if it was me that said it i >> some wayeven before Ben >> i ddint invest too much to find it out >> anyway >> it was me who first time defined the single smallest >> photon ENERGY!! >> as >> E =hf n >> WHILE >> 0 > n ,,,,,,1.00000 >> (Plank time is included in that defintion >> in any case it is obvious that it was me >> who leaded the whole development !! >> and at he bottom lne i did it right >> while the monkyInjertial >> just jumped as a monkey >> and did it wrong !!without understanding what he tried to >> steal !! >> until this moment he does not understand >> and it is documented >> ------------------ >> >> 2 >> Mr Inertial >> i am still waiting to your formula >> of smallest photon **energy** >> using ''''you'' Plank time !!! >> ps >> please answer my questions >> 1 >> and 2 >> dont try to evade any of them >> because it will be too obvious >> that you are running away >> >> TIA >> Y.Porat >> -------------------- > now what happened to you Inertial?? The weekend. Why? > in past you was very quick to answer!! > > or may be you and your gangster team > are working how > on another forgery project !!!??? Get a life > 2000 readers are waiting to see > how do you use your Plank time > in order > to get the smallest photon energy !!! I'm glad to see you admit that the readers are more interested in MY posts than your nonsense.
From: Y.Porat on 29 Mar 2010 06:31
On Mar 29, 1:39 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:de0caf87-3dbf-4dab-b9ee-4282e48524f9(a)n34g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > On Mar 27, 1:38 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >> >> Have you even looked .. it is very clearly there > > >> >> Guess I'll have to post a link > > >> >>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/417ba474... >> (the shortest quantum of time) > > > ------------------------------- > > how do you use the Plank time time > > to define the smallest single photon * energy* ?? > > The time to create a photon has nothing to do with its energy .. which is > fixed > > > just show us your complete formula ..... > > E = hf > > Notice that *I* am not afraid to answer quetsion. You still refused to > answer mine, so are clearly happy to admit defeat ----------------------------- but where is your "copyright discovery" to use *your* Plank time in order to define the smallest photon energy ??!! TIA Y.Porat ------------------------ |