Proton & electron ever been ISOLATED TOGETHER???
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: *** Re: Experts doubt Einstein..... but Einstein Dingleberries still worship him
Next: New theory of gravity
From: Inertial on 17 Jun 2010 02:59 <guskz(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1ecc0917-c1bb-43d7-a3c8-afb2c42941f5(a)y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 17, 12:20 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >> >> news:V9mdnRQ31ceNA4TRRVn_vwA(a)giganews.com... >> >> > Y.Porat wrote: >> >> THE *NEUTRON* IS A COMBINATION OF >> >> PROTON PLUS ELECTRON >> >> CONNECTED LINEARLY AS A >> >> **CHAIN OF ORBITALS * >> >> > No, it most definitely is not. You described a hydrogen atom, not a >> > neutron. They behave CONSIDERABLY differently. >> >> A neutron can decay into a proton and electron (and an >> electron-anti-neutrino as I recall). That doesn't necessarily mean that >> those particle exist as distinct particles inside a neutron. > > rather is a moment of inertia or inertia a resistance to displacement, > if so is simply resistance that what we call mass. > > as well mass is not called resistance but load in circuitry and > sometimes even a substitute for the word ground! > > And earth also know as mass and ground, sometimes the telephone > companies use earth as a positive (when there's interference with > electric trains/cars using the same earth), sometimes as a negative > terminal. You're a rather stupid troll
From: Y.Porat on 17 Jun 2010 04:39 On Jun 17, 6:20 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > > news:V9mdnRQ31ceNA4TRRVn_vwA(a)giganews.com... > > > Y.Porat wrote: > >> THE *NEUTRON* IS A COMBINATION OF > >> PROTON PLUS ELECTRON > >> CONNECTED LINEARLY AS A > >> **CHAIN OF ORBITALS * > > > No, it most definitely is not. You described a hydrogen atom, not a > > neutron. They behave CONSIDERABLY differently. > > A neutron can decay into a proton and electron (and an > electron-anti-neutrino as I recall). That doesn't necessarily mean that > those particle exist as distinct particles inside a neutron. ------------------ you are a chemist not a nuc scientist the hydrogen is something and the neutron is is something else have you ever dealt with Betta emission or electron capture ??? the binding energies associated with hydrogen loosing en electron and 'Electron capture' are different by orders of magnitudes !! ATB Y.Porat ----------------------------
From: Inertial on 17 Jun 2010 06:24 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:8b50ca29-5428-4ecf-a20f-cd64c7785e44(a)r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 17, 6:20 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >> >> news:V9mdnRQ31ceNA4TRRVn_vwA(a)giganews.com... >> >> > Y.Porat wrote: >> >> THE *NEUTRON* IS A COMBINATION OF >> >> PROTON PLUS ELECTRON >> >> CONNECTED LINEARLY AS A >> >> **CHAIN OF ORBITALS * >> >> > No, it most definitely is not. You described a hydrogen atom, not a >> > neutron. They behave CONSIDERABLY differently. >> >> A neutron can decay into a proton and electron (and an >> electron-anti-neutrino as I recall). That doesn't necessarily mean that >> those particle exist as distinct particles inside a neutron. > > ------------------ > you are a chemist not a nuc scientist Nope > the hydrogen is something > and the neutron is is something else That's just what Tom was telling YOU > have you ever dealt with > Betta emission or > electron capture ??? > the binding energies associated with > hydrogen loosing en electron > and 'Electron capture' are different > by orders of magnitudes !! Irrelevant to the structure of a neutron that you claimed.
From: guskz on 17 Jun 2010 10:20 On Jun 17, 2:59 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1ecc0917-c1bb-43d7-a3c8-afb2c42941f5(a)y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > > > > On Jun 17, 12:20 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > > >>news:V9mdnRQ31ceNA4TRRVn_vwA(a)giganews.com... > > >> > Y.Porat wrote: > >> >> THE *NEUTRON* IS A COMBINATION OF > >> >> PROTON PLUS ELECTRON > >> >> CONNECTED LINEARLY AS A > >> >> **CHAIN OF ORBITALS * > > >> > No, it most definitely is not. You described a hydrogen atom, not a > >> > neutron. They behave CONSIDERABLY differently. > > >> A neutron can decay into a proton and electron (and an > >> electron-anti-neutrino as I recall). That doesn't necessarily mean that > >> those particle exist as distinct particles inside a neutron. > > > rather is a moment of inertia or inertia a resistance to displacement, > > if so is simply resistance that what we call mass. > > > as well mass is not called resistance but load in circuitry and > > sometimes even a substitute for the word ground! > > > And earth also know as mass and ground, sometimes the telephone > > companies use earth as a positive (when there's interference with > > electric trains/cars using the same earth), sometimes as a negative > > terminal. > > You're a rather stupid troll M = E/c^2
From: Inertial on 17 Jun 2010 10:50
<guskz(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:aa1e08e9-cca5-4124-ba6d-11147c12cc38(a)h13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 17, 2:59 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1ecc0917-c1bb-43d7-a3c8-afb2c42941f5(a)y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> > On Jun 17, 12:20 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> >> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >> >> >>news:V9mdnRQ31ceNA4TRRVn_vwA(a)giganews.com... >> >> >> > Y.Porat wrote: >> >> >> THE *NEUTRON* IS A COMBINATION OF >> >> >> PROTON PLUS ELECTRON >> >> >> CONNECTED LINEARLY AS A >> >> >> **CHAIN OF ORBITALS * >> >> >> > No, it most definitely is not. You described a hydrogen atom, not a >> >> > neutron. They behave CONSIDERABLY differently. >> >> >> A neutron can decay into a proton and electron (and an >> >> electron-anti-neutrino as I recall). That doesn't necessarily mean >> >> that >> >> those particle exist as distinct particles inside a neutron. >> >> > rather is a moment of inertia or inertia a resistance to displacement, >> > if so is simply resistance that what we call mass. >> >> > as well mass is not called resistance but load in circuitry and >> > sometimes even a substitute for the word ground! >> >> > And earth also know as mass and ground, sometimes the telephone >> > companies use earth as a positive (when there's interference with >> > electric trains/cars using the same earth), sometimes as a negative >> > terminal. >> >> You're a rather stupid troll > > M = E/c^2 Still stupid |