Proton & electron ever been ISOLATED TOGETHER???
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: *** Re: Experts doubt Einstein..... but Einstein Dingleberries still worship him
Next: New theory of gravity
From: Y.Porat on 19 Jun 2010 21:04 On Jun 19, 3:11 pm, Owen Jacobson <angrybald...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 2010-06-17 22:16:22 -0400, Inertial said: > > > > > > > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >news:5eabf87b-efd2-410c-9b66-23ea962854cc(a)b29g2000vbl.googlegroups.com.... > On > > >> Jun 18, 1:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >>> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >>>news:69a490d7-46df-467d-9d2d-2d66a8daf99b(a)x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com.... > > >>>> On Jun 17, 6:57 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Jun 17, 10:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > >>>>>>news:aa1e08e9-cca5-4124-ba6d-11147c12cc38(a)h13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > >>>>>>> On Jun 17, 2:59 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > >>>>>>>>news:1ecc0917-c1bb-43d7-a3c8-afb2c42941f5(a)y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > >>>>>>>>> On Jun 17, 12:20 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > > >>>>>>>>>>news:V9mdnRQ31ceNA4TRRVn_vwA(a)giganews.com... > > >>>>>>>>>>> Y.Porat wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> THE *NEUTRON* IS A COMBINATION OF > >>>>>>>>>>>> PROTON PLUS ELECTRON > >>>>>>>>>>>> CONNECTED LINEARLY AS A > >>>>>>>>>>>> **CHAIN OF ORBITALS * > > >>>>>>>>>>> No, it most definitely is not. You described a hydrogen atom, > >>>>>>>>>>> not a > >>>>>>>>>>> neutron. They behave CONSIDERABLY differently. > > >>>>>>>>>> A neutron can decay into a proton and electron (and an > >>>>>>>>>> electron-anti-neutrino as I recall). That doesn't necessarily > >>>>>>>>>> mean > >>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>> those particle exist as distinct particles inside a neutron. > > >>>>>>>>> rather is a moment of inertia or inertia a resistance to > >>>>>>>>> displacement, > >>>>>>>>> if so is simply resistance that what we call mass. > > >>>>>>>>> as well mass is not called resistance but load in circuitry and > >>>>>>>>> sometimes even a substitute for the word ground! > > >>>>>>>>> And earth also know as mass and ground, sometimes the telephone > >>>>>>>>> companies use earth as a positive (when there's interference with > >>>>>>>>> electric trains/cars using the same earth), sometimes as a > >>>>>>>>> negative > >>>>>>>>> terminal. > > >>>>>>>> You're a rather stupid troll > > >>>>>>> M = E/c^2 > > >>>>>> Still stupid > > >>>>> We all still reside at the Singularity, the spatial dimensions are > >>>>> created through the vector time. > > >>>>> When you hold an object in your hand, it's only a bunch of electrical > >>>>> pulses (E) through your hands & eyes telling you it's an object. > > >>>>> If the pulses (E) were coming from a computer you could not tell the > >>>>> difference. > > >>>>> E signals through the vector Time. > >>>> ----------------- > >>>> and the time for a single photon energy is > >>>> the Planck time > >>>> hf times Planck time > > >>> Wrong > > >>> hf is NOT a formula for energy per unit time. So you do NOT multiply it by > >>> time to give energy. > > >>>> with its order of ( just from my poor memory) > > >>>> exp -24 second !!!! > > >>> You fail at dimensional analysis and physics as a whole. Get a new hobby .. > >>> like grave digging .. you'll need it soon enough. > > >> ----------------------- > >> Hi Josef (:-) (:-) > > > You still have no idea who I am and make wild guesses and incorrect > > conclusions. That's the same way you deal with physics .. wild guesses > > and incorrect conclusions. > > Hi Inertial, > > You seem to have reached a point where Porat decides what you post. > > -o ------------------- Hi Mr Jacobson! to whom did you answered ?? to anonymous ' Inertial'? or to anonymous ' Artful' ? or anonymous 'Whoever' all of them from Australia ?? ??? TIA Y.Porat -------------------------
From: Y.Porat on 19 Jun 2010 21:27 On Jun 19, 8:29 am, guskz <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 18, 6:00 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 18, 6:19 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 17, 2:18 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 17, 6:57 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 17, 10:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > > > <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >news:aa1e08e9-cca5-4124-ba6d-11147c12cc38(a)h13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 2:59 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > >>news:1ecc0917-c1bb-43d7-a3c8-afb2c42941f5(a)y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > >> > On Jun 17, 12:20 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> >> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > > > > > > > >> >>news:V9mdnRQ31ceNA4TRRVn_vwA(a)giganews.com... > > > > > > > >> >> > Y.Porat wrote: > > > > > > >> >> >> THE *NEUTRON* IS A COMBINATION OF > > > > > > >> >> >> PROTON PLUS ELECTRON > > > > > > >> >> >> CONNECTED LINEARLY AS A > > > > > > >> >> >> **CHAIN OF ORBITALS * > > > > > > > >> >> > No, it most definitely is not. You described a hydrogen atom, not a > > > > > > >> >> > neutron. They behave CONSIDERABLY differently. > > > > > > > >> >> A neutron can decay into a proton and electron (and an > > > > > > >> >> electron-anti-neutrino as I recall). That doesn't necessarily mean > > > > > > >> >> that > > > > > > >> >> those particle exist as distinct particles inside a neutron. > > > > > > > >> > rather is a moment of inertia or inertia a resistance to displacement, > > > > > > >> > if so is simply resistance that what we call mass. > > > > > > > >> > as well mass is not called resistance but load in circuitry and > > > > > > >> > sometimes even a substitute for the word ground! > > > > > > > >> > And earth also know as mass and ground, sometimes the telephone > > > > > > >> > companies use earth as a positive (when there's interference with > > > > > > >> > electric trains/cars using the same earth), sometimes as a negative > > > > > > >> > terminal. > > > > > > > >> You're a rather stupid troll > > > > > > > > M = E/c^2 > > > > > > > Still stupid > > > > > > We all still reside at the Singularity, the spatial dimensions are > > > > > created through the vector time. > > > > > > When you hold an object in your hand, it's only a bunch of electrical > > > > > pulses (E) through your hands & eyes telling you it's an object. > > > > > > If the pulses (E) were coming from a computer you could not tell the > > > > > difference. > > > > > > E signals through the vector Time. > > > > > ----------------- > > > > and the time for a single photon energy is > > > > the Planck time > > > > hf times Planck time > > > > > with its order of ( just from my poor memory) > > > > > exp -24 second !!!! > > > > ATB > > > > Y.Porat > > > > ------------------------ > > > > And since the other 3 spatial dimensions cannot have units smaller > > > that this increment, also demonstrates that the vector time is their > > > creator, not vice-versa. > > > --------------- > > iow > > the time indicator is the best indicator ???!!! > > i generally tend to agree with you > > Not like that, the photon is the smallest unit of MEASUREMENT FOR all > dimensions (X,Y, Z) which is a wavelength, that wavelength is only > TIME dependent and nothing else. > > For that reason TIME is the foundation for all other vectors > (dimensions) X,Y, Z. > ---------------------------------------- > A moment is a time unit and a DERIVATIVE (anti-derivative) > > In space-time metrics: the "moment" term (meaning instantaneous), it > is the tangent to the slope. > > Thus u, u^2,u^3,u^4, u would be the initial vector known as > time...and the 3 others are derivatives of time thus the 3 spatial > coordinates x,y,z > > ----------------------- > Too compare using Newtons: d, v, a (distance, velocity, > acceleration)... velocity is a derivative of distance, and > acceleration is a derivative of velocity. > > To keep it simple the origin thus the initial distance, velocity, ------------------------ that is the initial and ??!!! th e initial of what ?? is it initial of distance ? distance from what point to what point ?? if it is ** to the same start point* there is no distance ! and to move takes time !!! TO DO ANYTHING TAKES TIME!! FOR ANYTHING TO HAPPEN- TAKES TIME !! time is not a mathematical concept it is a physical * useful* concept !! NO TIME (duration) - NO USEFUL PHYSICS !!! right ??? ATB Y.Porat ---------------------
From: Y.Porat on 19 Jun 2010 22:55 On Jun 19, 3:11 pm, Owen Jacobson <angrybald...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 2010-06-17 22:16:22 -0400, Inertial said: > > > > > > > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >news:5eabf87b-efd2-410c-9b66-23ea962854cc(a)b29g2000vbl.googlegroups.com.... > On > > >> Jun 18, 1:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >>> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >>>news:69a490d7-46df-467d-9d2d-2d66a8daf99b(a)x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com.... > > >>>> On Jun 17, 6:57 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Jun 17, 10:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > >>>>>>news:aa1e08e9-cca5-4124-ba6d-11147c12cc38(a)h13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > >>>>>>> On Jun 17, 2:59 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > >>>>>>>>news:1ecc0917-c1bb-43d7-a3c8-afb2c42941f5(a)y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > >>>>>>>>> On Jun 17, 12:20 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > > >>>>>>>>>>news:V9mdnRQ31ceNA4TRRVn_vwA(a)giganews.com... > > >>>>>>>>>>> Y.Porat wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> THE *NEUTRON* IS A COMBINATION OF > >>>>>>>>>>>> PROTON PLUS ELECTRON > >>>>>>>>>>>> CONNECTED LINEARLY AS A > >>>>>>>>>>>> **CHAIN OF ORBITALS * > > >>>>>>>>>>> No, it most definitely is not. You described a hydrogen atom, > >>>>>>>>>>> not a > >>>>>>>>>>> neutron. They behave CONSIDERABLY differently. > > >>>>>>>>>> A neutron can decay into a proton and electron (and an > >>>>>>>>>> electron-anti-neutrino as I recall). That doesn't necessarily > >>>>>>>>>> mean > >>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>> those particle exist as distinct particles inside a neutron. > > >>>>>>>>> rather is a moment of inertia or inertia a resistance to > >>>>>>>>> displacement, > >>>>>>>>> if so is simply resistance that what we call mass. > > >>>>>>>>> as well mass is not called resistance but load in circuitry and > >>>>>>>>> sometimes even a substitute for the word ground! > > >>>>>>>>> And earth also know as mass and ground, sometimes the telephone > >>>>>>>>> companies use earth as a positive (when there's interference with > >>>>>>>>> electric trains/cars using the same earth), sometimes as a > >>>>>>>>> negative > >>>>>>>>> terminal. > > >>>>>>>> You're a rather stupid troll > > >>>>>>> M = E/c^2 > > >>>>>> Still stupid > > >>>>> We all still reside at the Singularity, the spatial dimensions are > >>>>> created through the vector time. > > >>>>> When you hold an object in your hand, it's only a bunch of electrical > >>>>> pulses (E) through your hands & eyes telling you it's an object. > > >>>>> If the pulses (E) were coming from a computer you could not tell the > >>>>> difference. > > >>>>> E signals through the vector Time. > >>>> ----------------- > >>>> and the time for a single photon energy is > >>>> the Planck time > >>>> hf times Planck time > > >>> Wrong > > >>> hf is NOT a formula for energy per unit time. So you do NOT multiply it by > >>> time to give energy. > > >>>> with its order of ( just from my poor memory) > > >>>> exp -24 second !!!! > > >>> You fail at dimensional analysis and physics as a whole. Get a new hobby .. > >>> like grave digging .. you'll need it soon enough. > > >> ----------------------- > >> Hi Josef (:-) (:-) > > > You still have no idea who I am and make wild guesses and incorrect > > conclusions. That's the same way you deal with physics .. wild guesses > > and incorrect conclusions. > > Hi Inertial, > > You seem to have reached a point where Porat decides what you post. > > -o -------------------- 2 Mr Jacobson while i suggest here that the Neutron is a combination of Proton and Electron is it an interesting idea for you ?? is it worthy to discuss about it ?? TIA Y.Porat -----------------------
From: guskz on 20 Jun 2010 01:54 On Jun 19, 9:27 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 19, 8:29 am, guskz <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 18, 6:00 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 18, 6:19 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 17, 2:18 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 17, 6:57 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 10:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > >news:aa1e08e9-cca5-4124-ba6d-11147c12cc38(a)h13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 2:59 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > > >>news:1ecc0917-c1bb-43d7-a3c8-afb2c42941f5(a)y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > >> > On Jun 17, 12:20 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> >> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > > > > > > > > >> >>news:V9mdnRQ31ceNA4TRRVn_vwA(a)giganews.com... > > > > > > > > >> >> > Y.Porat wrote: > > > > > > > >> >> >> THE *NEUTRON* IS A COMBINATION OF > > > > > > > >> >> >> PROTON PLUS ELECTRON > > > > > > > >> >> >> CONNECTED LINEARLY AS A > > > > > > > >> >> >> **CHAIN OF ORBITALS * > > > > > > > > >> >> > No, it most definitely is not. You described a hydrogen atom, not a > > > > > > > >> >> > neutron. They behave CONSIDERABLY differently. > > > > > > > > >> >> A neutron can decay into a proton and electron (and an > > > > > > > >> >> electron-anti-neutrino as I recall). That doesn't necessarily mean > > > > > > > >> >> that > > > > > > > >> >> those particle exist as distinct particles inside a neutron. > > > > > > > > >> > rather is a moment of inertia or inertia a resistance to displacement, > > > > > > > >> > if so is simply resistance that what we call mass. > > > > > > > > >> > as well mass is not called resistance but load in circuitry and > > > > > > > >> > sometimes even a substitute for the word ground! > > > > > > > > >> > And earth also know as mass and ground, sometimes the telephone > > > > > > > >> > companies use earth as a positive (when there's interference with > > > > > > > >> > electric trains/cars using the same earth), sometimes as a negative > > > > > > > >> > terminal. > > > > > > > > >> You're a rather stupid troll > > > > > > > > > M = E/c^2 > > > > > > > > Still stupid > > > > > > > We all still reside at the Singularity, the spatial dimensions are > > > > > > created through the vector time. > > > > > > > When you hold an object in your hand, it's only a bunch of electrical > > > > > > pulses (E) through your hands & eyes telling you it's an object.. > > > > > > > If the pulses (E) were coming from a computer you could not tell the > > > > > > difference. > > > > > > > E signals through the vector Time. > > > > > > ----------------- > > > > > and the time for a single photon energy is > > > > > the Planck time > > > > > hf times Planck time > > > > > > with its order of ( just from my poor memory) > > > > > > exp -24 second !!!! > > > > > ATB > > > > > Y.Porat > > > > > ------------------------ > > > > > And since the other 3 spatial dimensions cannot have units smaller > > > > that this increment, also demonstrates that the vector time is their > > > > creator, not vice-versa. > > > > --------------- > > > iow > > > the time indicator is the best indicator ???!!! > > > i generally tend to agree with you > > > Not like that, the photon is the smallest unit of MEASUREMENT FOR all > > dimensions (X,Y, Z) which is a wavelength, that wavelength is only > > TIME dependent and nothing else. > > > For that reason TIME is the foundation for all other vectors > > (dimensions) X,Y, Z. > > ---------------------------------------- > > A moment is a time unit and a DERIVATIVE (anti-derivative) > > > In space-time metrics: the "moment" term (meaning instantaneous), it > > is the tangent to the slope. > > > Thus u, u^2,u^3,u^4, u would be the initial vector known as > > time...and the 3 others are derivatives of time thus the 3 spatial > > coordinates x,y,z > > > ----------------------- > > Too compare using Newtons: d, v, a (distance, velocity, > > acceleration)... velocity is a derivative of distance, and > > acceleration is a derivative of velocity. > > > To keep it simple the origin thus the initial distance, velocity, > > ------------------------ > that is the initial > > and ??!!! > th e initial of what ?? > is it initial of distance ? > distance from > what point to what point ?? > if it is ** to the same start point* > there is no distance ! > and to move takes time !!! > TO DO ANYTHING TAKES TIME!! > FOR ANYTHING TO HAPPEN- TAKES TIME !! > > time is not a mathematical concept > it is a physical * useful* concept !! > NO TIME (duration) - NO USEFUL PHYSICS !!! > right ??? > ATB > Y.Porat > --------------------- Pretend you don't have an eye or a matrix of light sensors as in a camera. Instead to move around into space, you have only one single sensor, which is the tip of one single antenna pole. Therefore you can receive information about space from only one spot (one pixel). What are the ***NUMBER*** OF CHARACTERISTICS you can receive about space from that single uni-sensor. Each characteristic is a DIMENSION of space. For one thing the signal has to change, (it's can't always stay the same signal)....that's the first characteristic, and is therefore the dimension known as TIME. Know the signal can be there (black) or not there (white), that's the 2nd dimension (square wave). Then there's amplitude (sine wave), then there's rate of change of amplitude (frequency). It must be as such, for everything began from the singularity, which is a single spot (location), then all the other dimensions including the 1st, the hear beat known as TIME. All other spatial dimensions are only virtual (non-existent), a simulation emitted from the singularity. We all still reside in the singularity and are separated by one unit known as TIME. This is why both we and God are everywhere. For everywhere is still at the singularity, outside is the void, not outer-space (which is actually inner-space), but no where (no location or dimension). So when your eyes sees something it's only single file electrical pulses be recognized by one entity known as the RECEPTACLE which we call the soul. We perceive the eye getting a bunch of parallel signals, but they are not really parallel but serial pulses. Each "group" of pulses forming a parallel dimension. Example: Meaning at 0 to 120hz it the dimension y0 x1 to x20 then at 121 to 240hz it the parallel dimension y1 x1 to x20 sending the soul information, etc... And Likewise reverse when you're soul (mind) sends signals to your motor nerves to turn left or right,etc.... Same as a joystick, you send a signal and the image on your screen moves to the left....yet it's only timewise signal telling it turn into another dimension. That other dimension is not real, it's only simulation....for the soul still resides at the singularity. That sole soul, created all other dimensions, when it was born and went crazy for it needed a reality...thus the ethereal universe and spacetime were created out of the first mind that came into existence.
From: Mathal on 20 Jun 2010 02:03
On Jun 19, 7:55 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 19, 3:11 pm, Owen Jacobson <angrybald...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 2010-06-17 22:16:22 -0400, Inertial said: > > > > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:5eabf87b-efd2-410c-9b66-23ea962854cc(a)b29g2000vbl.googlegroups.com.... > > On > > > >> Jun 18, 1:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >>> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >>>news:69a490d7-46df-467d-9d2d-2d66a8daf99b(a)x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > >>>> On Jun 17, 6:57 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>> On Jun 17, 10:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>> <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > >>>>>>news:aa1e08e9-cca5-4124-ba6d-11147c12cc38(a)h13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > > >>>>>>> On Jun 17, 2:59 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > >>>>>>>>news:1ecc0917-c1bb-43d7-a3c8-afb2c42941f5(a)y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > > >>>>>>>>> On Jun 17, 12:20 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > > > >>>>>>>>>>news:V9mdnRQ31ceNA4TRRVn_vwA(a)giganews.com... > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Y.Porat wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> THE *NEUTRON* IS A COMBINATION OF > > >>>>>>>>>>>> PROTON PLUS ELECTRON > > >>>>>>>>>>>> CONNECTED LINEARLY AS A > > >>>>>>>>>>>> **CHAIN OF ORBITALS * > > > >>>>>>>>>>> No, it most definitely is not. You described a hydrogen atom, > > >>>>>>>>>>> not a > > >>>>>>>>>>> neutron. They behave CONSIDERABLY differently. > > > >>>>>>>>>> A neutron can decay into a proton and electron (and an > > >>>>>>>>>> electron-anti-neutrino as I recall). That doesn't necessarily > > >>>>>>>>>> mean > > >>>>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>>> those particle exist as distinct particles inside a neutron. > > > >>>>>>>>> rather is a moment of inertia or inertia a resistance to > > >>>>>>>>> displacement, > > >>>>>>>>> if so is simply resistance that what we call mass. > > > >>>>>>>>> as well mass is not called resistance but load in circuitry and > > >>>>>>>>> sometimes even a substitute for the word ground! > > > >>>>>>>>> And earth also know as mass and ground, sometimes the telephone > > >>>>>>>>> companies use earth as a positive (when there's interference with > > >>>>>>>>> electric trains/cars using the same earth), sometimes as a > > >>>>>>>>> negative > > >>>>>>>>> terminal. > > > >>>>>>>> You're a rather stupid troll > > > >>>>>>> M = E/c^2 > > > >>>>>> Still stupid > > > >>>>> We all still reside at the Singularity, the spatial dimensions are > > >>>>> created through the vector time. > > > >>>>> When you hold an object in your hand, it's only a bunch of electrical > > >>>>> pulses (E) through your hands & eyes telling you it's an object. > > > >>>>> If the pulses (E) were coming from a computer you could not tell the > > >>>>> difference. > > > >>>>> E signals through the vector Time. > > >>>> ----------------- > > >>>> and the time for a single photon energy is > > >>>> the Planck time > > >>>> hf times Planck time > > > >>> Wrong > > > >>> hf is NOT a formula for energy per unit time. So you do NOT multiply it by > > >>> time to give energy. > > > >>>> with its order of ( just from my poor memory) > > > >>>> exp -24 second !!!! > > > >>> You fail at dimensional analysis and physics as a whole. Get a new hobby .. > > >>> like grave digging .. you'll need it soon enough. > > > >> ----------------------- > > >> Hi Josef (:-) (:-) > > > > You still have no idea who I am and make wild guesses and incorrect > > > conclusions. That's the same way you deal with physics .. wild guesses > > > and incorrect conclusions. > > > Hi Inertial, > > > You seem to have reached a point where Porat decides what you post. > > > -o > > -------------------- > 2 > Mr Jacobson > while i suggest here that the Neutron > is a combination of > Proton and Electron > > is it an interesting idea for you ?? > > is it worthy to discuss about it ?? > > TIA > Y.Porat > ----------------------- DEAR P.ayrot Proton + Electron = Neutron .....does not , never has and never will compute. There is excess energy on the Electron + Proton side of the equation. That has been known for longer than you've been alive, unless you are a babbling old fart. I wouldn't know, but I'd be willing to guess. Mathal |