Science is young
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Science is young
Next: Fastest clock
From: BURT on 4 Jun 2010 23:13 On Jun 4, 7:32 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 6/4/2010 9:16 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 4, 7:08 pm, BruceS<bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 4, 6:32 am, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> <snip> > > >>> Oh, shut up, already. > > >> <snip > > >> While purple's posts had me scratching my head a bit about why he's > >> apparently trying to reason with an insane imbecile (I suspect an > >> ulterior motive), yours just made me laugh out loud. Sierra tango > >> foxtrot uniform indeed. Not going to happen, but funny anyway. > > > Show me where I am wrong about science Bruce. > > > The future is great not the beginning. It is not possible. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > It has already been done. That you're too stupid to comprehend > simple facts is nobody's fault, not even yours. The wrong parts > ran down your mother's leg.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - I think that you have to believe this about science to believe it about yourself. In both cases there is no greatness. Even our best like Einstein was just a very beginning in time. Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 5 Jun 2010 03:12 On 6/4/2010 9:36 PM, BURT wrote: > On Jun 4, 7:32 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 6/4/2010 9:16 PM, BURT wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jun 4, 7:08 pm, BruceS<bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Jun 4, 6:32 am, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> <snip> >> >>>>> Oh, shut up, already. >> >>>> <snip >> >>>> While purple's posts had me scratching my head a bit about why he's >>>> apparently trying to reason with an insane imbecile (I suspect an >>>> ulterior motive), yours just made me laugh out loud. Sierra tango >>>> foxtrot uniform indeed. Not going to happen, but funny anyway. >> >>> Show me where I am wrong about science Bruce. >> >>> The future is great not the beginning. It is not possible. >> >>> Mitch Raemsch >> >> It has already been done. > > Oh really? Show me. I say it is too young. > > Mitch Raemsch It has already been done. That you're too stupid to comprehend simple facts is nobody's fault, not even yours. The wrong parts ran down your mother's leg.
From: BURT on 5 Jun 2010 05:17 On Jun 5, 12:12 am, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 6/4/2010 9:36 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 4, 7:32 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 6/4/2010 9:16 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>> On Jun 4, 7:08 pm, BruceS<bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On Jun 4, 6:32 am, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>> <snip> > > >>>>> Oh, shut up, already. > > >>>> <snip > > >>>> While purple's posts had me scratching my head a bit about why he's > >>>> apparently trying to reason with an insane imbecile (I suspect an > >>>> ulterior motive), yours just made me laugh out loud. Sierra tango > >>>> foxtrot uniform indeed. Not going to happen, but funny anyway. > > >>> Show me where I am wrong about science Bruce. > > >>> The future is great not the beginning. It is not possible. > > >>> Mitch Raemsch > > >> It has already been done. > > > Oh really? Show me. I say it is too young. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > It has already been done. Oh really? Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 5 Jun 2010 23:40 On Jun 5, 12:12 am, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 6/4/2010 9:36 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 4, 7:32 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 6/4/2010 9:16 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>> On Jun 4, 7:08 pm, BruceS<bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On Jun 4, 6:32 am, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>> <snip> > > >>>>> Oh, shut up, already. > > >>>> <snip > > >>>> While purple's posts had me scratching my head a bit about why he's > >>>> apparently trying to reason with an insane imbecile (I suspect an > >>>> ulterior motive), yours just made me laugh out loud. Sierra tango > >>>> foxtrot uniform indeed. Not going to happen, but funny anyway. > > >>> Show me where I am wrong about science Bruce. > > >>> The future is great not the beginning. It is not possible. > > >>> Mitch Raemsch > > >> It has already been done. > > > Oh really? Show me. I say it is too young. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > It has already been done. That you're too stupid to comprehend > simple facts is nobody's fault, not even yours. The wrong parts > ran down your mother's leg.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - If you look into the history of this very young science do you know that it is mostly composed of mistakes? We haven't passed that time yet for science. It is the future where we will start to get things right. As of now no. Mitch Raemsch
From: nuny on 6 Jun 2010 04:29
On May 31, 6:55 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 31, 6:41 pm, "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote: (snip to the crash) > > When do you think "complete" understanding of *anything* will come? > > Millions of years of work not right around the corner as the nut > Hawking has promissed in the 80's. I'm uninterested in your opinion of Hawking. I asked your opinion of when we'll gain "complete understanding" of anything. So far you've managed to avoid expressing what "complete" might mean. Again I ask: > > Also, why do *you* think gold is yellow? And yes, that's a tease to try to get you to refute this: http://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/golden_glow/ Mark L. Fergerson |