The Electric Car
in [Design]
|
From: BradGuth on 30 Sep 2007 19:18 On Sep 29, 3:32 pm, "daestrom" <daestrom(a)NO_SPAM_HEREtwcny.rr.com> wrote: > "BradGuth" <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > c12h26 is just your most basic diesel/kerosene formula. Use whatever > > fossil heating oil or biofuel that makes you a happy camper, because > > the h2o2 will simply get the most thermaldynamic worth out of that > > fossil or biofuel, and without introducing zilch worth of NOx. > > Why bother with h2o2? Straight O2 would result in even higher temperatures. LO2 or LOX is a wee bit spendy/tough to store in sufficient volume and/ or for any extended time, whereas a composite reinforced storage tank of high-test h2o2 is good for at least a month at a time without losing 10% of its poop (possibly as little as -5%/month). > Why add another two more water molecules to the reaction and have to heat > them up as well? h2o2 + whatever else you're getting rid of is by far as hot and nasty enough. Ceramics is certainly a good application, but perhaps not quite O2 good enough, and having to run fuel rich is somewhat going in the wrong direction. > > Of course, straight O2 is a bit hard to package in a vehicle, so use LOX. > It's about as easy to come by as hi-grade h2o2. I mean, if you're going to > dream, dream big. I agree that a big dream needs a big goal. However, why not go for an obtainable goal by simply sticking with whatever works damn nicely as a liquid h2o2 fuel energy booster as is, thus going ahead without our having to reinvent the entire wheel. - Brad Guth -
From: The Ghost In The Machine on 30 Sep 2007 14:52 In sci.physics, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote on Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:24:01 -0400 <MPG.2169978dcd62c49498aaaa(a)news.individual.net>: > In article <pan.2007.09.30.11.56.08.561604(a)cerebrumconfus.it>, > excretatauris(a)cerebrumconfus.it says... >> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:32:07 -0400, daestrom wrote: >> >> > Of course, straight O2 is a bit hard to package in a vehicle, so use LOX. >> > It's about as easy to come by as hi-grade h2o2. I mean, if you're going >> > to dream, dream big. >> >> Better still, use supercritical O2. Imagine the scene, driving down the >> interstate: "Give the tanks a stir, honey" ;-) > > Better yet, use the air around the vehicle (it's free) and forget all > this bullshit about H2O2. > We already do. C8H18 + 12.5 O2 = 8CO2 + 9H2O 114g + 400g = 352g + 162g :-) -- #191, ewill3(a)earthlink.net If your CPU can't stand the heat, get another fan. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: BradGuth on 30 Sep 2007 19:34 On Sep 29, 5:04 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > BradGuth wrote: > > > The likes of Warren Buffett, William Mook and myself will gladly take > > care of supplying all the spare/surplus capacity of clean renewable > > energy for process of creating such nifty products of stored energy, > > as well as for boosting our nations's outdated and badly overloaded > > power grid, or on behalf whatever direct local applications you'd see > > fit to invest or waste such energy upon, and trust that this too is no > > lie, as being currently doable as is. > > > Of course as of 50+ years ago perhaps not, but we could and should > > have been deep into the R&D and consumer applications of accomplishing > > all of this as of a couple of decades ago, because it's all old > > physics and of the kind of proven science (much of which derived from > > smart Yids) that's replicated to death as of before then. > > - Brad Guth - > > I wonder if Warren Buffett knows that your trying to dirty his name > with your lies? I'll bet that you're the filthy little lying lizard in > his Geico insurance commercials. > > If he was interested in the subject his research would be going on > behind closed doors, and buried by severe NDA agreements. Why would he > back an ignorant know nothing like you, who can't keep his mouth shut? > Unlike your all-knowing self, Warren Buffett doesn't know all there is to know. Perhaps that's because he's merely human, and you are not quite. BTW, what's "dirty" about his clean/renewable energy? Is there something about Warren Buffett that you are not telling us? - Brad Guth -
From: Eric Gisin on 30 Sep 2007 21:20 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:470046B1.1046610C(a)hotmail.com... > > BradGuth wrote: > >> > Please tell us all, in every excruciating detail just how you manage >> > to live without any neurons. >> >> Now you're being that of a silly jewboy, arnt you. > > Your racist obsession makes you look exceedingly stupid. > Belief that "evil jews control the world" is very common in schizophrenia. Don't forget Guth's Venus illusions: http://www.crank.net/space.html
From: krw on 30 Sep 2007 22:58
In article <1191194727.373231.38730(a)22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>, bradguth(a)gmail.com says... > On Sep 29, 4:48 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> > wrote: > > John Larkin wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:39:46 -0700, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> > > > wrote: <snip> > > > >The likes of Warren Buffett, William Mook and myself will gladly > > > >provide those spare/surplus teraWatts of clean energy. Just inform > > > >our DOE as to how much, where and when, as then we'll take it from > > > >there, and deliver those clean and renewable tersWatts. > > > > > Say Hi to ol' Warren for me, next time you do lunch. > > > > Does Warren talk to waiters? > > He obviously doen't relate to anything of which you represent, instead > he's rich and powerful and doesn't have to waste valuable time with > the kind of lame loosers like yourself. What's wrong, didn't he tip you last time you drooled on him? -- Keith |