The Electric Car
in [Design]
|
From: BradGuth on 23 Oct 2007 09:55 On Oct 21, 5:19 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > BradGuth wrote: > > > On Oct 8, 5:21 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> > > wrote: > > > BradGuth wrote: > > > > > On Oct 8, 12:24 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> > > > > wrote: > > > > > BradGuth wrote: > > > > > > > Why do you and/or why would Warren Buffett hate the truth and > > > > > > otherwise have such disdain against our badly failing environment? > > > > > > Why do you continue to post your lies and hatred? > > > > > Now that's our warm and fuzzy semitic Michael A. Terrell, isn't it. > > > > Another thing you have no clue about, but it doesn't stop you from > > > posting your usual ignorant drivel. > > > The basic laws of physics and the best available science is drivel? > > (do tell) > > YAWN. Try to twist it all you want, loser. Every time you post, you > add proof of your ignoarnce, and inability to tell the truth. It's semitic infomercial spewing bigots like yourself that gave the likes of Hitler exactly what they wanted, and systematically used against your own kind. Way to go, Michael A. Terrell. Why not run this "Apollo Era Gas Core Nuclear Rocket Powered Moonship" entirely through a public owned and otherwise fully tax supported along with each of its nerd staff, on behalf of such computer wizards utilizing any one of dozens of our spendy supercomputers, that are fully capable of accomplishing exactly those sorts of virtual R&D as well as delivering those absolutely spiffy Google/NOVA sorts of fully interactive 3D animations in real time? We used to have our national supercomputer borg like collective or cache of "The Machine Room"(s) for accommodating just this sort of complex task. Since we clearly own it (in many cases having paid for several times over), why not use it? - Brad Guth - Good point, especially since those Zionists are so in charge of the private parts of our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush). Like taking control of a global corporation may require as little as owning 5%, whereas bit by bit such insider and/or indirect control is all that's necessary, especially if others of your kind are in charge of the vast bulk of mainstream media. - Brad Guth - For our personal and commercial transportation, H2O2 as clean energy density is simply the best kind of renewable liquid energy alternative on Earth, regardless of being made via PV, wind, tidal or geothermal (of which there's no such shortage of those alternatives). H2/LH2 is just as doable and every bit as usable for the same plus a few other good reasons. "Water Fuel Cell Research Site" http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/1b9d07381a7ab38e/398f37cdafa0dc9a#398f37cdafa0dc9a At least this is offering an affordable step that's taking us in the right direction. The various makings of H2/LH2 (including those of William Mook) is going to be the key to our viable fossil/synfuel future, that is if certain fossil and yellowcake energy bigots and their puppet warlords allow us to survive long enough, and those of Goggle/NOVA's pesky semitic usenet rusemasters of spermware/fuckware can be kept from continually trashing our PC/MAC computers in the process. Not that UTC(United Technologies Corp.) is the one and only fuel cell provider of commercial utility energy that's end-user and environmentally friendly. Largest U.S. Commercial Fuel Cell System Powers Long Island Call Center & Administration Building http://www.utc.com/press/releases/2005-09-21.htm "SOUTH WINDSOR, CT, September 21, 2005 -- The country's largest fuel cell power plant in commercial operation is being commissioned today in Long Island, N.Y. UTC Power, a division of United Technologies Corp. (NYSE:UTX), provided seven PureCell 200s to the project, which generates 1.4 megawatts of primary electrical power and 6.3 million BTUs of useable heat for Verizon Communications, Inc." "A fuel cell is an electrochemical device that combines hydrogen or hydrogen-rich fuel, and oxygen to produce electricity, heat and water. Fuel cells operate without combustion, making them virtually pollution free. While a traditional generating system produces as much as 25 pounds of pollutants to generate 1,000 kilowatt-hours of electricity, the PureCell 200 power plant produces less than an ounce." http://www.utcpower.com/fs/com/bin/fs_com_Page/0,11491,0236,00.html http://www.utcpower.com/fs/com/bin/fs_com_Page/0,11491,047,00.html http://www.utcpower.com/fs/com/bin/fs_com_Page/0,11491,0104,00.html http://www.utcpower.com/fs/com/bin/fs_com_Page/0,11491,0122,00.html In spite of all the semitic flak that's continually opposing any and all such energy alternatives, especially it they are based upon clean and renewable alternatives, whereas it seems all we need is to expedite upon the most viable alternatives of clean renewable energy to be creating those necessary volumes of H2, or even for otherwise creating h2o2 for directly utilizing along with our spendy fossil/ synfuel reserves that are getting towards the bottom of that dirty and somewhat bloody barrel or even the cubic meter worth of coal that would burn really clean and hot at the very least amount of CO2 and potentially zero NOx if it were getting the full benefits of h2o2 instead of forcing its combustion via our mostly N2 atmosphere and fresh water. The likes of Warren Buffett, William Mook and myself(Brad Guth) have been doing just that, by having been creating such energy alternatives and/or strongly suggesting as to how we should go about accomplishing this task. It doesn't really matter where the natural/renewable energy is derived from, it just needs to get with the process of creating those volumes of H2 and tonnes of h2o2 before it's too late (meaning WW-III). - Brad Guth -
From: BradGuth on 23 Oct 2007 09:59 On Oct 21, 5:19 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > BradGuth wrote: > > > On Oct 8, 5:21 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> > > wrote: > > > BradGuth wrote: > > > > > On Oct 8, 12:24 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> > > > > wrote: > > > > > BradGuth wrote: > > > > > > > Why do you and/or why would Warren Buffett hate the truth and > > > > > > otherwise have such disdain against our badly failing environment? > > > > > > Why do you continue to post your lies and hatred? > > > > > Now that's our warm and fuzzy semitic Michael A. Terrell, isn't it. > > > > Another thing you have no clue about, but it doesn't stop you from > > > posting your usual ignorant drivel. > > > The basic laws of physics and the best available science is drivel? > > (do tell) > > YAWN. Try to twist it all you want, loser. Every time you post, you > add proof of your ignoarnce, and inability to tell the truth. It's semitic infomercial spewing bigots like yourself that gave the likes of Hitler exactly what they wanted, and systematically used against your own kind. Way to go, Michael A. Terrell. For our personal and commercial transportation, H2O2 as clean energy density is simply the best kind of renewable liquid energy alternative on Earth, regardless of being made via PV, wind, tidal or geothermal (of which there's no such shortage of those alternatives). H2/LH2 is just as doable and every bit as usable for the same plus a few other good reasons. "Water Fuel Cell Research Site" http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/1b9d07381a7ab38e/398f37cdafa0dc9a#398f37cdafa0dc9a At least this is offering an affordable step that's taking us in the right direction. The various makings of H2/LH2 (including those of William Mook) is going to be the key to our viable fossil/synfuel future, that is if certain fossil and yellowcake energy bigots and their puppet warlords allow us to survive long enough, and those of Goggle/NOVA's pesky semitic usenet rusemasters of spermware/fuckware can be kept from continually trashing our PC/MAC computers in the process. Not that UTC(United Technologies Corp.) is the one and only fuel cell provider of commercial utility energy that's end-user and environmentally friendly. Largest U.S. Commercial Fuel Cell System Powers Long Island Call Center & Administration Building http://www.utc.com/press/releases/2005-09-21.htm "SOUTH WINDSOR, CT, September 21, 2005 -- The country's largest fuel cell power plant in commercial operation is being commissioned today in Long Island, N.Y. UTC Power, a division of United Technologies Corp. (NYSE:UTX), provided seven PureCell 200s to the project, which generates 1.4 megawatts of primary electrical power and 6.3 million BTUs of useable heat for Verizon Communications, Inc." "A fuel cell is an electrochemical device that combines hydrogen or hydrogen-rich fuel, and oxygen to produce electricity, heat and water. Fuel cells operate without combustion, making them virtually pollution free. While a traditional generating system produces as much as 25 pounds of pollutants to generate 1,000 kilowatt-hours of electricity, the PureCell 200 power plant produces less than an ounce." http://www.utcpower.com/fs/com/bin/fs_com_Page/0,11491,0236,00.html http://www.utcpower.com/fs/com/bin/fs_com_Page/0,11491,047,00.html http://www.utcpower.com/fs/com/bin/fs_com_Page/0,11491,0104,00.html http://www.utcpower.com/fs/com/bin/fs_com_Page/0,11491,0122,00.html In spite of all the semitic flak that's continually opposing any and all such energy alternatives, especially it they are based upon clean and renewable alternatives, whereas it seems all we need is to expedite upon the most viable alternatives of clean renewable energy to be creating those necessary volumes of H2, or even for otherwise creating h2o2 for directly utilizing along with our spendy fossil/ synfuel reserves that are getting towards the bottom of that dirty and somewhat bloody barrel or even the cubic meter worth of coal that would burn really clean and hot at the very least amount of CO2 and potentially zero NOx if it were getting the full benefits of h2o2 instead of forcing its combustion via our mostly N2 atmosphere and fresh water. The likes of Warren Buffett, William Mook and myself(Brad Guth) have been doing just that, by having been creating such energy alternatives and/or strongly suggesting as to how we should go about accomplishing this task. It doesn't really matter where the natural/renewable energy is derived from, it just needs to get with the process of creating those volumes of H2 and tonnes of h2o2 before it's too late (meaning WW-III). - Brad Guth -
From: Michael A. Terrell on 23 Oct 2007 11:03 BradGuth wrote: > > On Oct 21, 5:19 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> > wrote: > > > > YAWN. Try to twist it all you want, loser. Every time you post, you > > add proof of your ignoarnce, and inability to tell the truth. > > It's semitic infomercial spewing bigots like yourself that gave the > likes of Hitler exactly what they wanted, and systematically used > against your own kind. Way to go, Michael A. Terrell. Did your family have ANY kids who weren't born brain dead? -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: krw on 23 Oct 2007 20:02 In article <jo2qh3p25d9fhmcphrkuksktf5tigqi31j(a)4ax.com>, jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com says... > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:32:01 -0700, BradGuth <bradguth(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > >On Oct 22, 7:06 am, John Larkin > ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> On 22 Oct 2007 01:56:02 -0700, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >> Sounds like you have issues about money. Its impossible to make money > >> >> and not create value. That's what it means to make money. If you end > >> >> up with a lot of money in your pocket and have not created value, then > >> >> you are not a business person, you are a crook. That's the genius of > >> >> free-markets. All the exchanges are voluntary, so wealth is created > >> >> necessarily. > >> > >> >Our John Larken has issues with damn near everything under that sun > >> >which orbits is semitic flat Earth, and then some. > >> >- Brad Guth - > >> > >> There *are* now some effective treatments for obcessive-compulsive > >> disorder, you know. > > > >And you're telling us this because of your personal first-hand LLPOF > >or naysayism expertise that required such treatments? > >- Brad Guth - > > > No, I'm telling you that you have unreasonable compulsions about > Judiasm and hydrogen peroxide. Maybe you should date a yiddish blonde > for a while and get over it. Not his type. His sort prefers the boys in brown shirts. -- Keith
From: BradGuth on 23 Oct 2007 22:11
On Oct 22, 1:44 pm, John Larkin <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:32:01 -0700, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > >On Oct 22, 7:06 am, John Larkin > ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> On 22 Oct 2007 01:56:02 -0700, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> Sounds like you have issues about money. Its impossible to make money > >> >> and not create value. That's what it means to make money. If you end > >> >> up with a lot of money in your pocket and have not created value, then > >> >> you are not a business person, you are a crook. That's the genius of > >> >> free-markets. All the exchanges are voluntary, so wealth is created > >> >> necessarily. > > >> >Our John Larken has issues with damn near everything under that sun > >> >which orbits is semitic flat Earth, and then some. > >> >-BradGuth- > > >> There *are* now some effective treatments for obcessive-compulsive > >> disorder, you know. > > >And you're telling us this because of your personal first-hand LLPOF > >or naysayism expertise that required such treatments? > >-BradGuth- > > No, I'm telling you that you have unreasonable compulsions about > Judiasm and hydrogen peroxide. Maybe you should date a yiddish blonde > for a while and get over it. Now that'll help resolve our lack of clean energy and moderate our polluting exactly how? Obviously you're not serious about much of anything. (no surprise there) - Brad Guth - |