The proof of mass vector.
in [Math]
|
Prev: infinity ...
Next: The set of All sets
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 31 Dec 2006 22:17 On 2007-01-01 01:26:14 +0000, "Ka-In Yen" <yenkain(a)yahoo.com.tw> said: > You do'nt know a lot of thing. Euclid said, "There is no royal road > to geometry". God helps those who help themselves. God can not > help you, me neither. What you need is ten-years-hard-study by > yourself. But I'm not the one who cannot answer the question... What is the definition of \vec A for an irregular shape on an irregular surface... -- This space reserved for Jeff Relf's 5-dimensional metric. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: Eric Gisse on 31 Dec 2006 23:42 Ka-In Yen wrote: > Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: > > On 2006-12-30 00:22:33 +0000, "Ka-In Yen" <yenkain(a)yahoo.com.tw> said: > > > > > Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: > > >> On 2006-12-30 00:11:08 +0000, "Ka-In Yen" <yenkain(a)yahoo.com.tw> said: > > >> > > >>> Do'nt dodge. I am waiting for your derivation. > > >>> Could you write down your derivation step by step? > > >>> Do you mean A.BxC=(A.B)xC? > > >> > > >> What is the exact form of A (note: *not* dA) for an irregular shape on > > >> an irregularly curved surface? > > > > > > Go ask your teacher, I will not give you free e-touring any more. > > > > Thats not the answer from someone claiming to have a new answer that no > > one else knows... > > You do'nt know a lot of thing. Euclid said, "There is no royal road > to geometry". God helps those who help themselves. God can not > help you, me neither. What you need is ten-years-hard-study by > yourself. Says the guy who struggles with every facet of mathematics and physics.
From: Ka-In Yen on 1 Jan 2007 19:02 Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: > On 2007-01-01 01:26:14 +0000, "Ka-In Yen" <yenkain(a)yahoo.com.tw> said: > > > You do'nt know a lot of thing. Euclid said, "There is no royal road > > to geometry". God helps those who help themselves. God can not > > help you, me neither. What you need is ten-years-hard-study by > > yourself. > > But I'm not the one who cannot answer the question... Since you can answer the question, then you need 5-years-hard-study.
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 1 Jan 2007 19:15 On 2007-01-02 00:02:08 +0000, "Ka-In Yen" <yenkain(a)yahoo.com.tw> said: > Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: >> On 2007-01-01 01:26:14 +0000, "Ka-In Yen" <yenkain(a)yahoo.com.tw> said: >> >>> You do'nt know a lot of thing. Euclid said, "There is no royal road >>> to geometry". God helps those who help themselves. God can not >>> help you, me neither. What you need is ten-years-hard-study by >>> yourself. >> >> But I'm not the one who cannot answer the question... > > Since you can answer the question, then you need 5-years-hard-study. I know the answer, hence why I asked the pointed question... -- This space reserved for Jeff Relf's 5-dimensional metric. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: Eric Gisse on 1 Jan 2007 20:23
Ka-In Yen wrote: > Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: > > On 2007-01-01 01:26:14 +0000, "Ka-In Yen" <yenkain(a)yahoo.com.tw> said: > > > > > You do'nt know a lot of thing. Euclid said, "There is no royal road > > > to geometry". God helps those who help themselves. God can not > > > help you, me neither. What you need is ten-years-hard-study by > > > yourself. > > > > But I'm not the one who cannot answer the question... > > Since you can answer the question, then you need 5-years-hard-study. You are aware that the both of us already understand vector analysis and vector calculus, right? |