The world has never seen such freezing heat
in [Design]
|
Prev: Class D audio driver with external mosfets
Next: NE162 mixer: input/output impedance in balanced mode?
From: Eeyore on 22 Nov 2008 01:03 z wrote: > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! Graham
From: Whata Fool on 22 Nov 2008 05:29 Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >z wrote: > >> Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest > >But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! > >Graham Maybe not, just sloppy, incompetent, and biased. To be called a lie, they would have needed to know the truth, can anybody be sure the latest correction is correct?
From: a7yvm109gf5d1 on 22 Nov 2008 11:13 On Nov 22, 1:03 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > z wrote: > > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest > > But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! > > Graham That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this.
From: James Arthur on 22 Nov 2008 12:30 a7yvm109gf5d1(a)netzero.com wrote: > On Nov 22, 1:03 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> > wrote: >> z wrote: >>> Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest >> But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! >> >> Graham > > That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this. Not self-corrected, corrected by heretics. If that's how they check their data, one wonders how they check their calculations. Cheers, James Arthur
From: invalid on 22 Nov 2008 12:49
a7yvm109gf5d1(a)netzero.com wrote: > >Eeyore >wrote: > >> z wrote: >> >> > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest >> >> But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! >> >> Graham > >That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this. That's only for *real* science. Those who are trying to convince us that the holocaust never happened, that the earth was created just like it says in the Bible. or that man's activities are causing a catastrophic global warming, do not correct anything. They just make stuff up as needed to support their claims. Remember Steve McIntyre? He is the Canadian computer analyst who won fame for his expert debunking of the notorious hockey stick graph -- he applied the same "correction algorithm" that the global warming alarmists were using and got the same hockey stick (flat with a sudden rise at the end) out of hundreds of data sets created with a random number generator. Steve McIntyre's blog at < http://www.climateaudit.org/ > shows example after example of faked /ignored / bogus / absurdly faulty temperature data. See < http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4370 >. US meteorologist Anthony Watts shows many more examples of bogus temperature data at < http://wattsupwiththat.com/ >. Placing an official NOAA climate thermometer within a few feet of a gas burn-off torch for excess methane, for example. Or arctic weather stations where the instruments are on the roof of a station that is manned and heated. He also shows some out and out lies, such as charts from 1999 and 2008 that show editing/revising of the 1880-1999 numbers to make global warming look worse. See < http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/11/14/the-evolution-of-the-giss-temperature-product/ > for details. Also see: http://leatherheadblog.com/2008/11/17/al-gore-another-inconvenient-truth/ http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/11/15/giss-noaa-ghcn-and-the-odd-russian-temperature-anomaly-its-all-pipes/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/02/a_tale_of_two_thermometers/ http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/ecofascist-scare-tactics/ http://www.john-daly.com/giss-wig.gif http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/11/16/do1610.xml |