The world has never seen such freezing heat
in [Design]
|
Prev: Class D audio driver with external mosfets
Next: NE162 mixer: input/output impedance in balanced mode?
From: Bill Ward on 22 Nov 2008 13:29 On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:13:45 -0800, a7yvm109gf5d1 wrote: > On Nov 22, 1:03 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> z wrote: >> > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest >> >> But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! >> >> Graham > > That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this. But that's exactly the point. They didn't correct themselves. They posted incorrect data which was found and corrected by amateurs, and it's not the first time.
From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian on 22 Nov 2008 13:38 On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:21:04 +0000, Eeyore wrote: > Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:00:00 +0000, Me wrote: ... >> > Dr Pachauri, a former railway engineer with no qualifications in >> > climate science, may believe what Dr Hansen tells him. But whether, on >> > the basis of such evidence, it is wise for the world's governments to >> > embark on some of the most costly economic measures ever proposed, to >> > remedy a problem which may actually not exist, is a question which >> > should give us all pause for thought. >> > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/11/16/do1610.xml&site=15&page=0 >> >> Hear, Hear! > > Crikey ! You do know it's a right wing paper I hope ? ;~) That's irrelevant when what they're saying is true. Cheers! Rich
From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian on 22 Nov 2008 13:40 On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:17:50 +0000, Eeyore wrote: > Me wrote: >>... >> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/11/16/do1610.xml&site=15&page=0 > > People are beginning to notice the Emperor's New Clothes ! > Where have you old farts been? They exposed the ENC in the 1970's, and, just like in the story, the sheeple have been steadfastly swallowing the warmingist propaganda because it's soooo much easer than actually using their brain. Cheers! Rich
From: krw on 22 Nov 2008 19:57 In article <pan.2008.11.22.18.29.19.7288(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com>, bward(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com says... > On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:13:45 -0800, a7yvm109gf5d1 wrote: > > > On Nov 22, 1:03 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> z wrote: > >> > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest > >> > >> But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! > >> > >> Graham > > > > That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this. > > But that's exactly the point. They didn't correct themselves. They > posted incorrect data which was found and corrected by amateurs, and it's > not the first time. Ever notice that all the "errors" are in one direction? -- Keith
From: Bill Ward on 22 Nov 2008 20:28
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:57:57 -0600, krw wrote: > In article <pan.2008.11.22.18.29.19.7288(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com>, > bward(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com says... >> On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:13:45 -0800, a7yvm109gf5d1 wrote: >> >> > On Nov 22, 1:03 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> z wrote: >> >> > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th >> >> > highest >> >> >> >> But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! >> >> >> >> Graham >> > >> > That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this. >> >> But that's exactly the point. They didn't correct themselves. They >> posted incorrect data which was found and corrected by amateurs, and >> it's not the first time. > > Ever notice that all the "errors" are in one direction? Strange, isn't it? What are the odds on that happening by chance? |