The world has never seen such freezing heat
in [Design]
|
Prev: Class D audio driver with external mosfets
Next: NE162 mixer: input/output impedance in balanced mode?
From: Eeyore on 22 Nov 2008 22:03 invalid(a)example.com wrote: > a7yvm109gf5d1(a)netzero.com wrote: > >Eeyore >wrote: > >> z wrote: > >> > >> > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest > >> > >> But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! > > > >That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this. > > That's only for *real* science. Those who are trying to convince us > that the holocaust never happened, that the earth was created just > like it says in the Bible. or that man's activities are causing a > catastrophic global warming, do not correct anything. They just > make stuff up as needed to support their claims. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=Vv9OSxTy1aU Sorry about the poor quality video if your experience was like mine. Graham
From: Eeyore on 22 Nov 2008 22:09 Bill Ward wrote: > krw wrote: > > bward(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com says... > >> On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:13:45 -0800, a7yvm109gf5d1 wrote: > >> > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> z wrote: > >> >> > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th > >> >> > highest > >> >> > >> >> But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! > >> >> > >> >> Graham > >> > > >> > That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this. > >> > >> But that's exactly the point. They didn't correct themselves. They > >> posted incorrect data which was found and corrected by amateurs, and > >> it's not the first time. > > > > Ever notice that all the "errors" are in one direction? > > Strange, isn't it? What are the odds on that happening by chance? Ever heard of 'loaded dice' ? I reckon it's the MORAL DUTY of every decent engineer and scientist with a clear perspective to crush the AGW lie in 2009. Also I'd like to see ANY politician or scientist who backed it barred from office for not less than 10 years. And see the Nobel committee withdraw Gore's fraudulent 'prize'. And his comic film sent to a 'memory hole' except for one copy where we can examine how almost the entire world was misled by a bunch of freaks, chancers and opportunists. Graham
From: Whata Fool on 22 Nov 2008 23:01 Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote: > >> On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:21:04 +0000, Eeyore wrote: >> > Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote: >> >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:00:00 +0000, Me wrote: ... >> >> > Dr Pachauri, a former railway engineer with no qualifications in >> >> > climate science, may believe what Dr Hansen tells him. But whether, on >> >> > the basis of such evidence, it is wise for the world's governments to >> >> > embark on some of the most costly economic measures ever proposed, to >> >> > remedy a problem which may actually not exist, is a question which >> >> > should give us all pause for thought. >> >> > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/11/16/do1610.xml&site=15&page=0 >> >> >> >> Hear, Hear! >> > >> > Crikey ! You do know it's a right wing paper I hope ? ;~) >> >> That's irrelevant when what they're saying is true. > >I was just pulling your leg for fun ! ;~) > >Yes, even right-wingers can be right some of the time. You know as Parliament debated the latest Climate Change Bill here >in the UK as snow fell on the roof for the first time that early in the year since 1922 it was our former Conservative MP >for St Albans who queried the basis of it all. Previously I had no respect for the man other than he helped my g/f get >her new car put right by BL when the dealers couldn't. > >The Speaker of the House did what ? He told him to 'shut up' ! I thought Parliament was for debate. > >A very well-considered critic of AGW here is the former Conservative Cabiner Minister Nigel Lawson too. I had no time >for the man back then either. But he can see the fraud. > >I want to see those heads in baskets by the 10s of thousands. > >Don't forget the world's COOLING btw ! > >Graham No, tomorrow will be warmer. But only because it hasn't been much colder than today.
From: Whata Fool on 22 Nov 2008 23:06 Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Whata Fool wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >z wrote: >> > >> >> Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest >> > >> >But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! >> >> Maybe not, just sloppy, incompetent, and biased. >> >> To be called a lie, they would have needed to know the >> truth, can anybody be sure the latest correction is correct? > >Can you believe ANY of it any more ? It's religion, not science any more. > >Graham Sure, I can believe the Gulf Stream waxes and wanes, the high altitude low pressure systems can move slow or fast in any direction, and if it is dry in summer it can get hotter, and if it is dry in winter it can get colder. Hey, maybe Hansen's code doesn't treat the minus signs properly!
From: Whata Fool on 22 Nov 2008 23:10
krw <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >In article <pan.2008.11.22.18.29.19.7288(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com>, >bward(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com says... >> On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:13:45 -0800, a7yvm109gf5d1 wrote: >> >> > On Nov 22, 1:03 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> z wrote: >> >> > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest >> >> >> >> But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! >> >> >> >> Graham >> > >> > That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this. >> >> But that's exactly the point. They didn't correct themselves. They >> posted incorrect data which was found and corrected by amateurs, and it's >> not the first time. > >Ever notice that all the "errors" are in one direction? And even with the errors, the "warming" has plateaued, that is the nature of data sets as they mature. |