The world has never seen such freezing heat
in [Design]
|
Prev: Class D audio driver with external mosfets
Next: NE162 mixer: input/output impedance in balanced mode?
From: bill.sloman on 23 Nov 2008 08:03 On 23 nov, 05:33, Bill Ward <bw...(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:09:04 +0000, Eeyore wrote: > > > Bill Ward wrote: > > >> krw wrote: > >> > bw...(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com says... > >> >> On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:13:45 -0800, a7yvm109gf5d1 wrote: > >> >> > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> z wrote: > >> >> >> > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th > >> >> >> > highest > > >> >> >> But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! > > >> >> >> Graham > > >> >> > That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like > >> >> > this. > > >> >> But that's exactly the point. They didn't correct themselves. They > >> >> posted incorrect data which was found and corrected by amateurs, and > >> >> it's not the first time. > > >> > Ever notice that all the "errors" are in one direction? > > >> Strange, isn't it? What are the odds on that happening by chance? > > > Ever heard of 'loaded dice' ? > > > I reckon it's the MORAL DUTY of every decent engineer and scientist with a > > clear perspective to crush the AGW lie in 2009. > > > Also I'd like to see ANY politician or scientist who backed it barred from > > office for not less than 10 years. And see the Nobel committee withdraw > > Gore's fraudulent 'prize'. And his comic film sent to a 'memory hole' > > except for one copy where we can examine how almost the entire world was > > misled by a bunch of freaks, chancers and opportunists. > > Oh, I don't know about censoring it. With the right laugh track, it might > be a campy hit. In five years, it'll be a big joke, and no one will admit > ever believing it, just like the now denied global cooling fiasco. The "global cooling fiasco" didn't envisage global cooling, but rather local cooling around the North Atlantic if the Gulf Stream turned off - as has happened in the recent geolgical past (search on Younger Dryas). The Gulf Stream was observed to have decreased by about 30% from earlier flow rates, suggesting that it might be in the process of shutting down completely http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8398 but subsequent observations doesn't suggest that it is to slowing down any more. Do try to get your facts right. -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: bill.sloman on 23 Nov 2008 08:08 On 23 nov, 03:51, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Bill Ward wrote: > > a7yvm109gf5d1 wrote: > > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> z wrote: > > >> > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest > > > >> But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! > > > > That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this. > > > But that's exactly the point. They didn't correct themselves. They > > posted incorrect data which was found and corrected by amateurs, and it's > > not the first time. > > Not by a LONG way ! > > Ask a climate scientist with EXPERIENCE and he'll tell a story that will be > shouted down by the religious hordes. Then ask him how much he got paid by Exxon-Mobil to publicise his opinion. The "religious" hordes seem to have better-calibrated bullshit detectors than poor Eeyore, who doesn't seem able to quote an authority who hasn't been subsidised by Exxon-Mobil. -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: Whata Fool on 23 Nov 2008 08:24 bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote: >On 23 nov, 03:45, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> >wrote: >> Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:21:04 +0000, Eeyore wrote: >> > > Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote: >> > >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:00:00 +0000, Me wrote: ... >> > >> > Dr Pachauri, a former railway engineer with no qualifications in >> > >> > climate science, may believe what Dr Hansen tells him. But whether, on >> > >> > the basis of such evidence, it is wise for the world's governments to >> > >> > embark on some of the most costly economic measures ever proposed, to >> > >> > remedy a problem which may actually not exist, is a question which >> > >> > should give us all pause for thought. >> > >> >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtml?xml=/o... >> >> > >> Hear, Hear! >> >> > > Crikey ! You do know it's a right wing paper I hope ? ;~) >> >> > That's irrelevant when what they're saying is true. >> >> I was just pulling your leg for fun ! ;~) >> >> Yes, even right-wingers can be right some of the time. You know as Parliament debated the latest Climate Change Bill here >> in the UK as snow fell on the roof for the first time that early in the year since 1922 it was our former Conservative MP >> for St Albans who queried the basis of it all. Previously I had no respect for the man other than he helped my g/f get her new car put right by BL when the dealers couldn't. >> >> The Speaker of the House did what ? He told him to 'shut up' ! I thought Parliament was for debate. > >Informed debate. Your former MP for St. Albans seems to be as ill- >informed as you are, and the Speaker of the House does seem to be >better-informed (which wouldn't be difficult). > >> A very well-considered critic of AGW here is the former Conservative Cabiner Minister Nigel Lawson too. >> I had no time for the man back then either. But he can see the fraud. > >He knows even less about science than Eeyore, which leaves him equally >free to see fraud in arguments he too can't follow. > >> I want to see those heads in baskets by the 10s of thousands. > >You set your sight too low. If you keep on denying anthropogenic >global warming for long enough, and you will kill off billions. Oh, the woe, two degrees, how will we cope? Why did I ever start installing my air conditioners backwards.
From: Eeyore on 23 Nov 2008 09:02 bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote: > > > On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:21:04 +0000, Eeyore wrote: > > > > Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:00:00 +0000, Me wrote: ... > > > >> > Dr Pachauri, a former railway engineer with no qualifications in > > > >> > climate science, may believe what Dr Hansen tells him. But whether, on > > > >> > the basis of such evidence, it is wise for the world's governments to > > > >> > embark on some of the most costly economic measures ever proposed, to > > > >> > remedy a problem which may actually not exist, is a question which > > > >> > should give us all pause for thought. > > > >> >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtml?xml=/o... > > > > > >> Hear, Hear! > > > > > > Crikey ! You do know it's a right wing paper I hope ? ;~) > > > > > That's irrelevant when what they're saying is true. > > > > I was just pulling your leg for fun ! ;~) > > > > Yes, even right-wingers can be right some of the time. You know as Parliament debated the latest > Climate Change Bill here in the UK as snow fell on the roof for the first > time that early in the year > since 1922 it was our former Conservative MP for St Albans who queried the basis of it all. > Previously I had no respect for the man other than he > helped my g/f get her new car put right by BL > when the dealers couldn't. > > > > The Speaker of the House did what ? He told him to 'shut up' ! I thought Parliament was for > debate. > > Informed debate. Your former MP for St. Albans seems to be as ill- > informed as you are, and the Speaker of the House does seem to be > better-informed (which wouldn't be difficult). The Slow Man wants to stifle debate. Yes, that fits the picture. Graham
From: MooseFET on 23 Nov 2008 09:59
On Nov 22, 6:45 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:21:04 +0000, Eeyore wrote: > > > Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote: > > >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:00:00 +0000, Me wrote: ... > > >> > Dr Pachauri, a former railway engineer with no qualifications in > > >> > climate science, may believe what Dr Hansen tells him. But whether, on > > >> > the basis of such evidence, it is wise for the world's governments to > > >> > embark on some of the most costly economic measures ever proposed, to > > >> > remedy a problem which may actually not exist, is a question which > > >> > should give us all pause for thought. > > >> >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtml?xml=/o... > > > >> Hear, Hear! > > > > Crikey ! You do know it's a right wing paper I hope ? ;~) > > > That's irrelevant when what they're saying is true. > > I was just pulling your leg for fun ! ;~) > > Yes, even right-wingers can be right some of the time. You know as Parliament debated the latest Climate Change Bill here > in the UK as snow fell on the roof for the first time that early in the year since 1922 it was our former Conservative MP > for St Albans who queried the basis of it all. Previously I had no respect for the man other than he helped my g/f get > her new car put right by BL when the dealers couldn't. > > The Speaker of the House did what ? He told him to 'shut up' ! I thought Parliament was for debate. > > A very well-considered critic of AGW here is the former Conservative Cabiner Minister Nigel Lawson too. I had no time > for the man back then either. But he can see the fraud. > > I want to see those heads in baskets by the 10s of thousands. > > Don't forget the world's COOLING btw ! The sun spots are back |