The world has never seen such freezing heat
in [Design]
|
Prev: Class D audio driver with external mosfets
Next: NE162 mixer: input/output impedance in balanced mode?
From: Whata Fool on 22 Nov 2008 20:33 a7yvm109gf5d1(a)netzero.com wrote: >On Nov 22, 1:03 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> >wrote: >> z wrote: >> > Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest >> >> But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! >> >> Graham > >That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this. No, science doesn't work by screwups caused by incompetents in a big rush to release the latest boring averaged numbers.
From: James Arthur on 22 Nov 2008 21:42 krw wrote: > In article <pan.2008.11.22.18.29.19.7288(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com>, > bward(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com says... >> On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:13:45 -0800, a7yvm109gf5d1 wrote: >> >>> On Nov 22, 1:03 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> z wrote: >>>>> Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest >>>> But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! >>>> >>>> Graham >>> That's absurd. Science works by self-correction mechanisms like this. >> But that's exactly the point. They didn't correct themselves. They >> posted incorrect data which was found and corrected by amateurs, and it's >> not the first time. > > Ever notice that all the "errors" are in one direction? Yes. Excellent point. IOW, systematic bias. That's not very scientific. Cheers, James Arthur
From: Eeyore on 22 Nov 2008 21:45 Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote: > On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:21:04 +0000, Eeyore wrote: > > Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote: > >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:00:00 +0000, Me wrote: ... > >> > Dr Pachauri, a former railway engineer with no qualifications in > >> > climate science, may believe what Dr Hansen tells him. But whether, on > >> > the basis of such evidence, it is wise for the world's governments to > >> > embark on some of the most costly economic measures ever proposed, to > >> > remedy a problem which may actually not exist, is a question which > >> > should give us all pause for thought. > >> > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/11/16/do1610.xml&site=15&page=0 > >> > >> Hear, Hear! > > > > Crikey ! You do know it's a right wing paper I hope ? ;~) > > That's irrelevant when what they're saying is true. I was just pulling your leg for fun ! ;~) Yes, even right-wingers can be right some of the time. You know as Parliament debated the latest Climate Change Bill here in the UK as snow fell on the roof for the first time that early in the year since 1922 it was our former Conservative MP for St Albans who queried the basis of it all. Previously I had no respect for the man other than he helped my g/f get her new car put right by BL when the dealers couldn't. The Speaker of the House did what ? He told him to 'shut up' ! I thought Parliament was for debate. A very well-considered critic of AGW here is the former Conservative Cabiner Minister Nigel Lawson too. I had no time for the man back then either. But he can see the fraud. I want to see those heads in baskets by the 10s of thousands. Don't forget the world's COOLING btw ! Graham
From: Eeyore on 22 Nov 2008 21:46 Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote: > On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:17:50 +0000, Eeyore wrote: > > Me wrote: > >> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/11/16/do1610.xml&site=15&page=0 > > > > People are beginning to notice the Emperor's New Clothes ! > > Where have you old farts been? They exposed the ENC in the 1970's, and, > just like in the story, the sheeple have been steadfastly swallowing > the warmingist propaganda because it's soooo much easer than actually > using their brain. Simple. Most people aren't used to USING their brains. 60% of the UK population are now sceptics. Expect more after this winter. Graham
From: Eeyore on 22 Nov 2008 21:47
Whata Fool wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >z wrote: > > > >> Actually, GISS now reports the corrected October temps as 5th highest > > > >But they LIED initially ANYWAY ! > > Maybe not, just sloppy, incompetent, and biased. > > To be called a lie, they would have needed to know the > truth, can anybody be sure the latest correction is correct? Can you believe ANY of it any more ? It's religion, not science any more. Graham |