Vulcan .Net and VO 2.8 - yeah right....
in [Visual Objects]
|
From: Geoff Schaller on 25 Sep 2006 18:53 Evil doers? <ROFL> Where do you guys get off with the over-emotive language. You realise of course that when you respond with such ridiculous words that it destroys any credibility in your point of view. We all wanted Brian to take VO away from CA - I was one of the architects of persuasion - not a key player by any means but one of them. The problem is what has ensued since. If you can't understand the frustrations and sense of loss being felt by many, many people then I question your bona fides in this discussion. Just shrug off the discussion and move on. I don't think there is any need to comment in your way as much as your express disappointment at Craig. Geoff "Jamal" <vodotnet_NoSpam(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:XmWRg.3527$Vk4.2900(a)trnddc01: > Don, > > There is no doubt that some on this NG have lost it all due to the constant > barrage of negative posts by the evil doers who have turned this NG into > what is right now, a tool to spread their evil hate, smear campaign and > agenda. It's really a shame! > > Without Grafx and Brian's commitment to VO, it would have been dead long > time ago. Without VOPS and the support of "real professionals" in the VO > community there would be no VO 2.8 and there would be no Vulcan. VOPS has > proven to be a real value to me and the produts that I sell and support. > This is why I will continue my support of Grafx undeterred by the barking of > the evil doers who have nothing else to do. > > Jamal
From: Jamal on 25 Sep 2006 19:33 > Evil doers? <ROFL> I truely mean that! It's not a laughing matter anymore. > Just shrug off the discussion and move on. < Those were not discussions. They were venmous personal and public attacks. I only blame you and Graham for all this. You have contributed to this mess! I do not know what your problems are, you repeated your points time and time again, and everyone heard by now out loud, but yet you continue this vicouse assault. I did not have a problem with you or Graham, neither Brian, nor Don, and certainely not this NG. Just grow up! Jamal "Geoff Schaller" <geoff(a)xxxsoftwareobjectives.com.au> wrote in message news:45185de4(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... > Evil doers? <ROFL> > > Where do you guys get off with the over-emotive language. You realise of > course that when you respond with such ridiculous words that it destroys > any credibility in your point of view. We all wanted Brian to take VO away > from CA - I was one of the architects of persuasion - not a key player by > any means but one of them. The problem is what has ensued since. If you > can't understand the frustrations and sense of loss being felt by many, > many people then I question your bona fides in this discussion. > > Just shrug off the discussion and move on. > > I don't think there is any need to comment in your way as much as your > express disappointment at Craig. > > Geoff > > > "Jamal" <vodotnet_NoSpam(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:XmWRg.3527$Vk4.2900(a)trnddc01: > >> Don, >> >> There is no doubt that some on this NG have lost it all due to the >> constant >> barrage of negative posts by the evil doers who have turned this NG into >> what is right now, a tool to spread their evil hate, smear campaign and >> agenda. It's really a shame! >> >> Without Grafx and Brian's commitment to VO, it would have been dead long >> time ago. Without VOPS and the support of "real professionals" in the VO >> community there would be no VO 2.8 and there would be no Vulcan. VOPS has >> proven to be a real value to me and the produts that I sell and support. >> This is why I will continue my support of Grafx undeterred by the barking >> of >> the evil doers who have nothing else to do. >> >> Jamal >
From: Geoff Schaller on 25 Sep 2006 19:46 Oh puh-leeease! <g> Venom has nothing to do with it nor is anything 'evil'. You are simply descending into the exact same crime you accuse others of. Just calm down and take the abuse-o-meter down a few notches. Grow up indeed! "Jamal" <vodotnet_NoSpam(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:_GZRg.9321$Wi1.942(a)trnddc06: > > Evil doers? <ROFL> > > > I truely mean that! It's not a laughing matter anymore. > > > > Just shrug off the discussion and move on. < > > > Those were not discussions. They were venmous personal and public attacks. > > I only blame you and Graham for all this. You have contributed to this mess! > I do not know what your problems are, you repeated your points time and time > again, and everyone heard by now out loud, but yet you continue this vicouse > assault. I did not have a problem with you or Graham, neither Brian, nor > Don, and certainely not this NG. Just grow up! > > Jamal >
From: Sherlock on 25 Sep 2006 19:48 Graham snip[ Craig is one of the nicest guys you'd ever meet. Read his message again, > there is no malice in it, he's just another VO user pissed off with Grafx > letting off a bit of steam. ] He is someone not very well informed... and informed by a few with an axe to grind. snip[ Uncle Phil's got another agenda there to be sure. ] My agenda is easy. I have like many millions of lines of VO code and a solid income from these applications. I am investing in probably the last VO and it needs to be there for me for years to come as I am not going to rewrite everything in C#. If it ain't broke then dont touch it and get onto some productive work. The issue of the attack on Grafx I feel is unwarranted and achieves nothing. Phil ------
From: Ginny Caughey on 25 Sep 2006 20:16
Hi Phil, >Bullshit.. bullshit. You have even less credibility than George Bush and this is prettyr low. It is low indeed. Some people around here say that although W may be wrong, at least he doesn't think so. Geoff knows what he's saying is wrong, but he loves the attention that he gets by saying it more than the truth. I guess we'll know that he's ready for politics when he begins to believe his own blather. Ginny |