What is wrong with this argument?
in [Logic]
|
Next: arithmetic in ZF
From: SOB) on 1 Apr 2005 13:10 On 1 Apr 2005 09:23:31 -0800, "Hector Plasmic" <hec(a)hectorplasmic.com> wrote: >> You are free to believe or not. I am interested because I see a >> pattern in Prophesy that seems to relate to today's world. >I See a Pattern in Bobby that Seems to Relate to your Being a Very, >very Silly Bobby. That is oh so profound - for an adolescent pipsqueak like you. -- Million Mom March For Gun Confiscation http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/mmm.html "If you build a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. If you set a man on fire, he will be warm for the rest of his life."
From: SOB) on 1 Apr 2005 13:16 On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 08:57:49 -0800, Incubus <in(a)in.net> wrote: >> ... Your claims are no >> better than the epistemological system you use to support them. ... >Your system is letting you down, old boy. My system is just fine. It's yours that is fatally flawed. Old boy. >One fact you evidently do not know >is that atheism is not about making claims, "Atheism is characterized by an >absence of belief in the existence of gods." -- >http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/intro.html How do you know that the atheist's claim is rational? I maintain that it is part of their fantasy world having nothing to do with objective reality. >"The deepest sin against the human mind is to believe things without >evidence." -- Thomas Huxley, Evolution and Ethics There is a much deeper sin - to deny the existence of something when the evidence supporting its existence is overwhelming. This all comes down to the Worldview. If you adopt the Worldview of Existential Realism, the one that Physicists adopt in order to be productive, then the existence of the Supreme Being is a necessity. If, on the other hand, you adopt the Worldview of Idealism, then the existence of anything is not proveable. The only thing you can prove is that you exist and then only to yourself. Ask Bertrand Russell. -- Million Mom March For Gun Confiscation http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/mmm.html "If you build a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. If you set a man on fire, he will be warm for the rest of his life."
From: SOB) on 1 Apr 2005 13:17 On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 09:00:59 -0800, Incubus <in(a)in.net> wrote: >>>>Is Jerusalem in the valley? >>>You actually think their "original homeland" was in Jerusalem? :-) >> <Geez> >Geez is all hearsay: Where is the site upon which the Temple was built twice? That is the Homeland that Prophesy speaks about. -- Million Mom March For Gun Confiscation http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/mmm.html "If you build a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. If you set a man on fire, he will be warm for the rest of his life."
From: Michael Voytinsky on 1 Apr 2005 13:33 The great philosopher-criminologist wrote: > What is wrong with saying that God works in Mysterious ways? Nothing wrong with it, but it is not very helpful. Why did the tsunami kill all these people? 'Cause God works in mysterious ways. Why did the baby die in that house fire? 'Cause God works in mysterious ways. Why did God order the Hebrews to kill all those people in the Old Testament? 'Cause He works in mysterious ways. Why did you kill that entire family with an axe and arrange their body parts in alphabetical order? 'Cause God, speaking to me from inside my head, told me to, and He works in mysterious ways. How do you know that God, working in mysterious ways, did not intend the Bible simply as a grand joke? 'Cause, erh..... In other words, this explanation can be used to answer any question at all, in a very non-helpful way.
From: Tom on 1 Apr 2005 13:54
"Sweet Ol' Bob (SOB)" <sob(a)sob.com> wrote in message news:424d6e53.5290807(a)news-server.houston.rr.com... > On 1 Apr 2005 05:50:14 -0800, "Hector Plasmic" <hec(a)hectorplasmic.com> > wrote: > >>>> They've resettled the Tigris/Euphrates valley? > >>> Is Jerusalem in the valley? > >>You actually think their "original homeland" was in Jerusalem? :-) > > <Geez> Another non-answer from the SOB. |