From: Sak Wathanasin on
On 27 May, 18:50, zoara <m...(a)privacy.net> wrote:

> > A suicide rate of 2/100.000/year is very low indeed,
>
> incredibly low even,

Except that this is not a random sample of the general population;
it's a group of "lucky" people with steady jobs, income, housing,
leisure facilities &c. Now Foxconn don't sound like Cadburys or
Rowntree in their heyday, but even so, compared to 16-hrs a day in the
padi fields, it must seem like paradise. What is more, this is a
group who applied to work in those factories, and will have been
picked by the Foxconn HR as being able to cope with the conditions.
Any suicide in such a group must be worrying.
From: Jim on
On 2010-05-28, Sak Wathanasin <sw(a)nan.co.uk> wrote:
> On 27 May, 18:50, zoara <m...(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> > A suicide rate of 2/100.000/year is very low indeed,
>>
>> incredibly low even,
>
> Except that this is not a random sample of the general population;
> it's a group of "lucky" people with steady jobs, income, housing,
> leisure facilities &c. Now Foxconn don't sound like Cadburys or
> Rowntree in their heyday, but even so, compared to 16-hrs a day in the
> padi fields, it must seem like paradise. What is more, this is a
> group who applied to work in those factories, and will have been
> picked by the Foxconn HR as being able to cope with the conditions.
> Any suicide in such a group must be worrying.

No, it just means they have different problems.

Jim
--
Twitter:@GreyAreaUK

"If you have enough book space, I don't want to talk to you."
Terry Pratchett
From: zoara on
zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote:
> T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 May 2010 10:28:40 +0100, usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk (Woody)
>> wrote:
>
>>> In which case 10 suicides is a remarkably low figure as it is a long
>>> way
>>> below average
>>
>>
>> Ah, that's ok then, get Apple making more stuff over there (or at
>> least till the Apple production lines hit national suicide average).
> ;-)
>
> Please don't joke about suicide.
>
> Thanks.

I'm not sure how that smiley lost its quite bar, it wasn't mine.

-z-




--
email: nettid1 at fastmail dot fm
From: Dr Geoff Hone on
On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:36:13 +0100, italiancar(a)gmail.com (SteveH)
wrote:

>Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> > > No, cos with this shirt you are not getting anything extra.
>> >
>> > The extra is that it'll still look good after it has been washed a dozen
>> > times, and therefore will last longer.
>>
>> That is the common logic, but in my direct experience not borne out in
>> practice.
>
>Hmmm, I bought some shirts from our clothing dept. at work, something
>like 6 quid, including a tie. They're a bit rubbish, the material is so
>thin you could use it as tracing paper.
>
>> The mac cost is slightly different. I can get more done on the mac
>> faster, and enjoy the process, so the relative costs of the componants
>> are nowhere near as important as the costs to my time.
>
>Back to the shirts.... M&S shirts cost more than those I can buy at
>work, but they rarely need ironing as they are made from a better
>material.... so, the saving in time makes them worthwhile.
>
I gave up buying M&S Shirts years back - and those from any European
retailer. All the retailers in Europe seem to think that one sleeve
length fits all. I need a large shirt (to go over the paunch) with a
large collar (to go round a neck enlarged by the exercises following
open heart surgery), but I do not want sleeves that come down over my
fingertips. The Americans seem to understand the concept of having
more than one sleeve length - so all my recent purchases of long
sleeve shirts have been made in the US.
I do not care where they were made, so long as they fit me.
Same with most high-tech stuff really - if you really want British
Made, you will pay way over the odds for it; then you will find out
that it was also manufactured outside our shores.
I remember the first Wilson government and their "Buy British"
campaign in the late '60s: the concepts of good quality and good
design did not come into it.
M&S quality was great when they had their stuff made in the UK, and
could visit the supplier regularly. They switched to the far east,
and quality took a nosedive.
Geoff

From: SteveH on
SteveH <italiancar(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> > Hmm, but on something that is already 'expensive' would that really be
> > an issue?
>
> Yes.
>
> I'd have ordered an iPad at �399.
>
> At �429 it has broken a 'barrier' and I've stalled over purchasing.
>
> Kind of hoping they'll turn up on the refurb store in the not too
> distant future.

Gah!

I couldn't resist, could I.

Bought a 32GB iPad from Purple World on my way home today.
--
SteveH
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Prev: Why the iMac aint so good
Next: iPads here in the UK!