Can Christian Electronic Designers Design?
in [Design]
|
From: D from BC on 5 Jul 2010 03:13 In article <XZ6dnXfq6JFTdpPRnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, regor(a)midwest.net says... > Go ahead and kill anyone you don't like, if you don't get caught you > get off free. It is easy to see why DfromBC fights desperately for atheism. > Killing is forgivable in the Christian faith. Christians can nuke the world and say 'Forgive me lord' and go to heaven. The Jews killed Jesus and that made God forgive all sins anytime. Christians can thank the Jewish people for giving Christians the freedom to do any imaginable evil and still go to heaven. Ref http://www.gotquestions.org/sin-God-not-forgive.html Christian engineers are ridiculous to go to heaven by using forgiveness for killing. Forgiveness (to get to heaven) for killing results in no deferent for killing. Forgiveness + killing = free to kill What keeps Christians from not killing is the same reason Atheists don't kill. It's not good to kill everyone because burgers need flipping and toilets need washing. -- D from BC British Columbia
From: m II on 6 Jul 2010 23:32 D from BC wrote: > It's not good to kill everyone because burgers need flipping and toilets > need washing. ...and mail needs sorting... mike
From: Bob Eld on 7 Jul 2010 12:43 On 6/30/2010 4:58 PM, David Eather wrote: > On 30/06/2010 7:59 AM, D from BC wrote: >> In article<RaKdnY9c3_yAOLvRnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, >> eather(a)tpg.com.au says... >>> If anyone is interested in a good bible translation may I suggest the >>> TNIV (Today's New International Translation) as a modern and fairly >>> formal translation or "The Message" translation as an equally modern but >>> less formal translation - The Message was originally published without >>> chapter and verse numbering which make it hard to study with others, so >>> make sure you get a "numbered" or "remix" edition. >>> >> >> >> Deuteronomy 23:1 >> ?No one whose testicles are crushed or whose male organ is cut off shall >> enter the assembly of the LORD." >> English Standard Version (�2001) >> >> Deuteronomy 23:1 >> No one who has been emasculated by crushing or cutting may enter the >> assembly of the LORD. >> TNIV >> >> Deuteronomy 23:1 is still hilarious in the TNIV. >> >> Christian engineers are ridiculous to have a serious bible with >> laughable content. >> Seriously, the assembly of the lord wants balls. >> >> > > If you want to criticise Christianity you will have to read the new > testament on which the covenant of Christianity is based. One of the best electrical engineer I knew was a born again Christian nut case. He used to hold noon time prayer meetings with like minded kooks. But the guy was a genius at electronics. I once had a discussion with him about geology and the age of rocks and of the earth and he was oblivious to the well known science of that subject. I wondered how the hell he ever got an engineering degree without a basis in other sciences. It was a though his brain was totally compartmentalized. One piece of information was totally separate from all other information and there were no connections or relations between them. For him nothing in physics or electronics conflicted with is Christian superstitions. That thought process was and is totally foreign to me. In my thinking everything is related and NO piece of information or evidence exists alone in a vacuum. I would suspect that his type are few and far between. Most religious nut cases do NOT study or relate to science or engineering and are not likely to be great electronic designers.
From: Bill Bowden on 7 Jul 2010 21:17 On Jul 7, 9:43 am, Bob Eld <nsmontas...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On 6/30/2010 4:58 PM, David Eather wrote: > > > > > On 30/06/2010 7:59 AM, D from BC wrote: > >> In article<RaKdnY9c3_yAOLvRnZ2dnUVZ_jydn...(a)giganews.com>, > >> eat...(a)tpg.com.au says... > >>> If anyone is interested in a good bible translation may I suggest the > >>> TNIV (Today's New International Translation) as a modern and fairly > >>> formal translation or "The Message" translation as an equally modern but > >>> less formal translation - The Message was originally published without > >>> chapter and verse numbering which make it hard to study with others, so > >>> make sure you get a "numbered" or "remix" edition. > > >> Deuteronomy 23:1 > >> ?No one whose testicles are crushed or whose male organ is cut off shall > >> enter the assembly of the LORD." > >> English Standard Version (©2001) > > >> Deuteronomy 23:1 > >> No one who has been emasculated by crushing or cutting may enter the > >> assembly of the LORD. > >> TNIV > > >> Deuteronomy 23:1 is still hilarious in the TNIV. > > >> Christian engineers are ridiculous to have a serious bible with > >> laughable content. > >> Seriously, the assembly of the lord wants balls. > > > If you want to criticise Christianity you will have to read the new > > testament on which the covenant of Christianity is based. > > One of the best electrical engineer I knew was a born again Christian > nut case. He used to hold noon time prayer meetings with like minded > kooks. But the guy was a genius at electronics. > > I once had a discussion with him about geology and the age of rocks and > of the earth and he was oblivious to the well known science of that > subject. I wondered how the hell he ever got an engineering degree > without a basis in other sciences. > > It was a though his brain was totally compartmentalized. One piece of > information was totally separate from all other information and there > were no connections or relations between them. For him nothing in > physics or electronics conflicted with is Christian superstitions. > > That thought process was and is totally foreign to me. In my thinking > everything is related and NO piece of information or evidence exists > alone in a vacuum. > > I would suspect that his type are few and far between. Most religious > nut cases do NOT study or relate to science or engineering and are not > likely to be great electronic designers. Well, there are quite a few terrorists trying to kill everybody in the name of religion that have engineering degrees. Case in point would be Mohamed Atta who masterminded the 911 attack. He was doing God's work using well known physics principles. http://www.slate.com/id/2240157 "The anecdotal evidence has always been strong. The mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, Mohamed Atta, was an architectural engineer. Khalid Sheikh Mohamed got his degree in mechanical engineering. Two of the three founders of Lashkar-e-Taibi, the group believed to be behind the Mumbai attacks, were professors at the University of Engineering and Technology in Lahore." -Bill
From: D from BC on 8 Jul 2010 01:02
In article <i12arv$m63$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, nsmontassoc(a)yahoo.com says... > I would suspect that his type are few and far between. Most religious > nut cases do NOT study or relate to science or engineering and are not > likely to be great electronic designers. > That sparks a rant.. An illegal interview question for an engineer is 'What religion do you practice?' http://www.hrworld.com/features/30-interview-questions-111507/ The question is rightfully illegal for janitors but wrongly illegal for engineering. 'What religion do you practice?' is an essential question for engineering. 'What religion do you practice?' is massively more necessary to ask compared to asking illegal questions such as nationality, marital or family status or heath. 'What religion do you practice?' helps an employer to measure a level of science denial or evidence denial. Nobody likes to see reports on transistor demons causing product failure. Atheists applying for an engineering job must be careful to avoid accidentally getting HR filtered due to religiosity. If asked 'What days are you available to work?' (A legal HR question.) Atheists should say everyday. Not I can't work Sundays or Easter or Good Friday. Time off is nice but not getting the job is a bummer. Christian engineers are ridiculous to possibly fake Atheism to get engineering jobs. -- D from BC British Columbia |