Prev: Brightness OSD in Squeeze
Next: GRUB Hard Disk Error
From: Sven Joachim on 21 May 2010 12:10 On 2010-05-21 18:01 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > And one more thing: if the package in sid/unstable is updated too often > it will never migrate to testing, because it has to be at least 10 days > old (assuming no bugs are found and there are no dependency problems). As long as the package is not meant to migrate to testing anyway, this is not a big problem. ;-) Note that the question whether Chromium should be shipped with Squeeze is still undecided.� Sven � http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581265 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y6fd9r3c.fsf(a)turtle.gmx.de
From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. on 21 May 2010 12:10 On Friday 21 May 2010 10:48:44 Steve Fishpaste wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:42:16AM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. uttered: > > On Friday 21 May 2010 10:23:15 Steve Fishpaste wrote: > > > In my opinion we should keep up with the new releases at least weekly. > > > Is this on the agenda to do? > > > > You volunteering? Contact the maintainer(s). > > Sure if I can help in any way I'd be happy to. Then contact the maintainers. They may or may not be watching this mailing list. > > If not, you'll just have to wait for the other volunteers to get around > > to it. > > If they're not going to keep up with upstream, then why in the hell > bother. Because older versions are still valuable to the vast majority of users. Keeping up with upstream is *one* of the many responsibilities of a Debian Maintainer. > People want a recent release in a web browser, especially in > Sid! The are a *vast* number of things that go into a Debian release that have nothing to do with upstream's schedule. Sid is a staging ground for packages meant for release, not just upstream's tarball compiled and thrown into a deb. (Although, that may very well be what you are getting out of a PPA or OBS.) Web browsers don't need updating any more often that any other piece of software. I'm using IceWeasel from backports and Konqueror from testing, and they serve their purpose quite well. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss(a)iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
From: Jordan Metzmeier on 21 May 2010 12:20 On 05/21/2010 11:32 AM, jeremy jozwik wrote: > on Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Steve Fishpaste > <marathon.durandal(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Why is the Chromium-browser in Sid so old? Chromium has been on the >> 6.x branch for a couple of weeks now and Debian is still using the 5.x >> branch. >> > question, on lenny is there a different repository for chromium? just > did a apt search to find chromium. > > only package is some arcade game. > > > There are packages for google-chrome-beta and google-chrome-unstable for lenny from upstream google. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4BF6B121.8090908(a)gmail.com
From: John on 21 May 2010 12:30 On 21/05/10, Steve Fishpaste (marathon.durandal(a)gmail.com) wrote: | | Why is the Chromium-browser in Sid so old? There seem to be three versions of the browser available: 1. google-chrome-unstable, currently at 6.0.401.1-r47049, from google. 2. chromium-browser, currently at 5.0.375.38~r46659-1, which used to be available from unstable, but which I have heard is now in sid. 3. google-chrome-beta, currently at 5.0.375.53, also from google. I am running each on a different laptop, and find it taxing to try to keep up on differences among them. But if you have a specific question, I'll try to figure out the answer. -- JohnRChamplin(a)columbus.rr.com ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/99421A63 2005-01-05 EE51 79E9 F244 D734 A012 1CEC 7813 9FE9 9942 1A63 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 99421A63
From: John Hasler on 21 May 2010 13:00
JohnRChamplin writes: > ...which used to be available from unstable, but which I have heard is > now in sid. Unstable _is_ Sid. In any case, a few weeks is not old. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874oi1437h.fsf(a)thumper.dhh.gt.org |