Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: rbwinn on 14 Jul 2008 20:11 On Jul 14, 8:03�am, The Loan Arranger <no...(a)nowhere.invalid> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > Think about it, Smiler. �I am not going to go to alt.atheism. �I have > > no interest in atheists. > > That's why you post into alt.atheism, and engage with atheists in a > thread that spans many thousands of posts? > > TLA As I said, take sci.physics and sci.physics relativity out of the header, and I will never see your posts. Robert B. Winn
From: Steve O on 14 Jul 2008 20:12 "rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:44f19f98-4d96-4419-a87a-d6bdbd73f31b(a)c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... >> > Their idea is that if Hezekiah's tunnel exists, then Harry Potter has >> > to be true because the train station in London is mentioned in Harry >> > Potter. >> >> Exactly. Since we know therefore that harry potter isn't true, the fact >> of hezekiahs tunnel means the bible is obviously false. Since we have >> true facts referred to in works of complete fiction. >> >> By your reasoning at least. >> > Well, you have it exactly as atheists have been telling me it is. > Don't ask me what it is supposed to mean. > Robert B. Winn Here is an example of rbwinn's logic. Sheep are mentioned in the bible Sheep exist today The bible is accurate and there is a God -- Steve O a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter) B.A.A.W.A. Convicted by Earthquack Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence
From: rbwinn on 14 Jul 2008 20:15 On Jul 14, 1:30 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Jul 13, 8:35�pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >> On Jul 14, 12:10 pm, Stan-O <bndsna...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:43:18 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>> Well, you have not talked to any of your fellow atheists lately. > >>>>>> Their idea is that if Hezekiah's tunnel exists, then Harry Potter has > >>>>>> to be true because the train station in London is mentioned in Harry > >>>>>> Potter. > >>>>> Your speculations are utter rubbish... > >>>> That is not speculation. �That is what they actually said to me. > >>>> Robert B. Winn > >>> Your idiotic posts say more about you than anything any atheist posts.. > >> Him and those others (Chung, Duck etc) do provide the single biggest > >> advertisement of what's wrong with religion I've ever seen. �They > >> could loose a debate with a tape recording that pipes up and says > >> "well, that's interesting" every couple of minutes. > > >> Al > > > Well, there is your mistake, Al.  There is no debate.  You are free to > > believe whatever you want to believe. > > Are people not free to take whatever side they choose in a debate?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Well, if you can find a debate, why don't you make that decision for yourself? Robert B. winn
From: Stan-O on 14 Jul 2008 21:08 On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:04:54 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote: >> >> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/68/HezekiahTunnel.jpg >> >> Now, can you please provide the post where an atheist said that, if >> Hezekiah's Tunnel exists, than Harry Potter has to be true because the >> train station in London is mentioned in Harry Potter? >> >No, we are going to move on. You are not in a position to make that decision. >The Harry Potter books have nothing to >do with the Biblical account of the construction of Hezekiah's tunnel. Which means you still can't answer a simple question.
From: Stan-O on 14 Jul 2008 21:15
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:11:57 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote: >On Jul 14, 8:03?am, The Loan Arranger <no...(a)nowhere.invalid> wrote: >> rbwinn wrote: >> > Think about it, Smiler. ?I am not going to go to alt.atheism. ?I have >> > no interest in atheists. >> >> That's why you post into alt.atheism, and engage with atheists in a >> thread that spans many thousands of posts? >> >> TLA > >As I said, take sci.physics and sci.physics relativity out of the >header, and I will never see your posts. >Robert B. Winn Of course, Robert won't take alt.atheism out of *his* header because he enjoys being made to look like a fool day after day... Admit it, Robert - you need us... |