Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: BuddyThunder on 14 Jul 2008 16:30 rbwinn wrote: > On Jul 13, 8:35�pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: >> On Jul 14, 12:10 pm, Stan-O <bndsna...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:43:18 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>> wrote: >>>>>> Well, you have not talked to any of your fellow atheists lately. >>>>>> Their idea is that if Hezekiah's tunnel exists, then Harry Potter has >>>>>> to be true because the train station in London is mentioned in Harry >>>>>> Potter. >>>>> Your speculations are utter rubbish... >>>> That is not speculation. �That is what they actually said to me. >>>> Robert B. Winn >>> Your idiotic posts say more about you than anything any atheist posts. >> Him and those others (Chung, Duck etc) do provide the single biggest >> advertisement of what's wrong with religion I've ever seen. �They >> could loose a debate with a tape recording that pipes up and says >> "well, that's interesting" every couple of minutes. >> >> Al > > Well, there is your mistake, Al. There is no debate. You are free to > believe whatever you want to believe. Are people not free to take whatever side they choose in a debate?
From: BuddyThunder on 14 Jul 2008 16:34 rbwinn wrote: > On Jul 13, 9:15�pm, ben_dolan_...(a)reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote: >> Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...(a)swbell.net> wrote: >>> Your volitional choice, Linda. >> Apparently "volitional" is your new favorite word, you seem to use it in >> every post you make. I know it sounds impressive, but it doesn't do >> anything for the utter nonsense of your argument. > > I think it does. Only an atheist would want all choices made for > them. BAAAHAHAHA!! More rbwinn gold! Yeah, us rational types really like being told what to think from the pulpit. Oh wait...
From: BuddyThunder on 14 Jul 2008 16:35 Antares 531 wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:59:07 -0700 (PDT), hhyapster(a)gmail.com wrote: > >> On Jul 14, 5:35 am, Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...(a)swbell.net> wrote: >>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:03:41 -0700, ben_dolan_...(a)reet.com (Ben Dolan) >>> wrote: >>> > (snip) >>>> Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...(a)swbell.net> wrote: >>> Believing that everything just happened by pure chance is the thing >>> that I can't fathom. How do you swallow that load of horse barn >>> sweepings? >>> >>> You remind me of the allegorical sentient computer that has never been >>> connected to the Internet. Never having experienced an Internet >>> connection, this sentient computer is convinced that the Internet does >>> not exist, but is merely a figment of the imaginations of those other >>> sentient computers that have a connection to the Internet. And, >>> although this never-been-connected computer has all the hardware and >>> software it needs it adamantly refuses to activate its DSL connection >>> and find out for its self. >>> >>> Gordon >> You are trying to bullshit here that your god has no power to grant >> sufficient intelligence to human to grasp the "meaning......" >> What a silliest point one can make up. >> > God does indeed have infinite power and wisdom. He could handle this > any way he chose to do. He chose to let us live as mortals and learn, > hands-on, about sin and rebellion. The intention is to let us learn > enough to assure God that we won't try to go back and explore it any > further, once we've been granted immortality and absolute sovereignty. > God is presently (by our temporal reference frame) in the process of > separating good from evil. Those who reject God and are not willing to > be with Him throughout eternity will be moved, along with all other > aspects of existence that are not good. This will then be separated > from God's domain, irreversibly. > > Some refer to this separated section as Hell. It will indeed appear to > be burning, eternally, from a perspective on God's side of the > separation nexus. From a perspective on the other side of this nexus, > it will just be another multiverse, but everything there will be rife > with all that God identifies as evil or not good. Gordon Sounds like the kind of Dr. Who episode I think I'd enjoy. When's it screening?
From: Linda Fox on 14 Jul 2008 17:14 On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:51:07 -0500, Antares 531 <gordonlrDELETE(a)swbell.net> wrote: >You're not the Linda Fox that I do genealogy research with, are you? No. There are surprisingly many of us around. There is one who lives in the road that leads off the one I live in, at the same house number. You couldn't make it up, could you? :o) Linda ff
From: Brian E. Clark on 14 Jul 2008 17:23
In article <g3je745vhlou37gh340g2hhniu4vth4kpl@ 4ax.com>, Antares 531 said... > I'm not speaking for Robert, but my replies aren't to you, or to any > specific atheist. My replies are intended for other readers who > haven't yet passed the point of no return, Don't be ridiculous; there is no "point of no return." There is only a lack of evidence. Should you or any of your brethren ever offer something beyond appeal to faith and saccharine sentiment, you would witness a conversion of atheists so grand and so quick that it will make Pentecost look like a hundred-year nap. -- ----------- Brian E. Clark |