From: Hugh Coomes on
I am still using xterm, primarily because I have not found another
terminal emulator that matches the xterm capability of mapping keystroke
output (using the X resource:
XTerm*VT100.Translations: #override).

Are there any other terminal emulators that implement mapping of
keystroke output in a complete and reasonable manner ?


From: Casper H.S. Dik on
Drazen Kacar <dave(a)fly.srk.fer.hr> writes:

>I'm considering moving to xterm, but I suppose I'll have to compile it
>myself.


It is still a part of Solaris/OpenSolaris.


Casper
--
Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.
From: Canuck57 on
On 18/02/2010 4:06 PM, Drazen Kacar wrote:
> ChrisS wrote:
>> What Terminal Emulator do you (a Solaris admin) use on Solaris 10 and
>> OpenSolaris?
>
> I use wterm, with some home-made patches.
>
>> I know I'll get picked on here for admitting this, but as an
>> administrator I always go back to CDE's dtterm. It's light-weight,
>
> A long time ago someone said people would start calling Motif applications
> lightweight one day and I didn't believe. :-)

Neither did I, yet by todays standards it is a lean model.

>> What does an old dinosaur do; just suck it up and use gnome-
>> terminal? Go back to xterm?
>
> I'm considering moving to xterm, but I suppose I'll have to compile it
> myself.

Have been using xterm since I don't know when, perhaps 80's. Certainly
in the 90's. Always is consistant and there.
From: Michael Laajanen on
Hi,

Canuck57 wrote:
> On 18/02/2010 4:06 PM, Drazen Kacar wrote:
>> ChrisS wrote:
>>> What Terminal Emulator do you (a Solaris admin) use on Solaris 10 and
>>> OpenSolaris?
>>
>> I use wterm, with some home-made patches.
>>
>>> I know I'll get picked on here for admitting this, but as an
>>> administrator I always go back to CDE's dtterm. It's light-weight,
>>
>> A long time ago someone said people would start calling Motif
>> applications
>> lightweight one day and I didn't believe. :-)
>
> Neither did I, yet by todays standards it is a lean model.
>
I remember how slow our SS2s where when we run Triteal CDE, and now its
lightning fast :)


>>> What does an old dinosaur do; just suck it up and use gnome-
>>> terminal? Go back to xterm?
>>
>> I'm considering moving to xterm, but I suppose I'll have to compile it
>> myself.
>
> Have been using xterm since I don't know when, perhaps 80's. Certainly
> in the 90's. Always is consistant and there.
I think xterm arrived almost before X11 itself!

/michael
From: Sven Mascheck on
Hugh Coomes wrote:

> Are there any other terminal emulators that implement mapping of
> keystroke output in a complete and reasonable manner ?

I wouldn't be surprised if there were none.
- What you see in xterm, is (somewhat automatically) implemented
by means of the translation tables in libXt.
- rxvt avoids linking libXt by intention, aiming at a smaller footprint.
- younger terminal emulators might consider libXt as oldfashioned.

BTW, see also
- the "X Toolkit Intrinsics F.A.Q"
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/Xt-FAQ/
- and here I collected what I found interesting
http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/X11/xterm/