Impossible For CO2 to Heat Oceans
in [Physics]
|
From: David on 20 Aug 2006 21:41 The problem is that most of those who concern themselves with the global warming issue (regardless of their position on the issue) don't understand it. This is not to say that every ones understanding is poor. Only specialists really understand it. Even some people who make contributions to the knowledge - the scientists that do the research - may only understand a single aspect of this immensely complex problem. There is no hope what so ever of coming to a better understanding of the importance of CO2 in out atmosphere if no respect for different viewpoints. I think the above is an interesting postulate. How can it be proved true or false?
From: Ben Newsam on 21 Aug 2006 17:12 On 21 Aug 2006 14:06:31 -0700, kdthrge(a)yahoo.com wrote: >Those that believe in CO2 as the cause for global warming have no >science and therefore are committing serious crime in attempting to >control fossil fuels. I bet you're American, aren't you? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: kdthrge on 21 Aug 2006 21:04 Ben Newsam wrote: > On 21 Aug 2006 14:06:31 -0700, kdthrge(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > >Those that believe in CO2 as the cause for global warming have no > >science and therefore are committing serious crime in attempting to > >control fossil fuels. > > I bet you're American, aren't you? > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com I don't know what you mean. Science is science, you know 1 + 1 + 1 = 3. Unless you're in quantum mechanics, where you can renormalize your equation to zero after the first 1, and therfore it equals 2 whcih you need to make some bullshit work a little better. After years of this kind of pyscological abuse which makes those with mechanical aptitude flee from this theoretical science, those with degrees are for the most part pinheads. So the rest of the world joined the damned Kyoto treaty and are sucking the big one of the no science theoretical scientists. We'll just see if the United States is that stupid. Kent Deatherage
From: Hoggle on 22 Aug 2006 00:46 hanson wrote: > You are attacking THEIR SOURCES OF INCOME. I have never earned so much as a penny from climate science, nor am I ever likely to. I have, however, saved substantial sums by reducing my use of fossil fuels. Perhaps you should do the same? > I hate to rain on your parade, Ken, but the time of arguing strict > science like you do is over. Like he does? Have you read his demolition of quantum mechanics? If you really want a laugh, please do so.
From: hanson on 22 Aug 2006 11:44
"Hoggle" <admin(a)co2emissions.org.uk> wrote in message news:1156221960.026331.55620(a)74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com... > [hanson to Kent] >> You are attacking THEIR SOURCES OF INCOME. > [Hoogle feeling green guilt] > I have never earned so much as a penny from climate science, nor am I > ever likely to. I have, however, saved substantial sums by reducing my > use of fossil fuels. Perhaps you should do the same? > [hanson] ..... ahahahaha...now, my dear, dear Hoggle, you've just destroyed your own argument by annoucing that you are a class 3 enviro. Thanks for the laughs... ahahahaha... ahahaha... ahahanson |