Impossible For CO2 to Heat Oceans
in [Physics]
|
From: kdthrge on 25 Aug 2006 06:36 > > The CO2 density is highest at the lowest levels of the atmosphere, and > therefore the Infrared Radiation absorption occurs mostly at lowest > altitudes closest to the Earth emitter of IR radiation.> Bullshit. Cannot be confirmed scientifically. CO2 causing all this IR absorption. And even if it did, you obviously cannot do the most basic arithmatic on heat capacity and thermodynamics or you would see that it is IMPOSSIBLE FOR CO2 warm the ocean. Get back with your liitle boyfriends and make up some better lies on how CO2 traps all this heat which can't be DETECTED. It ain't gonna fly you saying that we just have to believe little dishonest runt school boys like you. Do you believe your own lies. Like the one you tell that you're and educated person. Kent Deatherage
From: Lloyd Parker on 25 Aug 2006 04:29 In article <1156502181.488014.298530(a)p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>, kdthrge(a)yahoo.com wrote: >> >> The CO2 density is highest at the lowest levels of the atmosphere, and >> therefore the Infrared Radiation absorption occurs mostly at lowest >> altitudes closest to the Earth emitter of IR radiation.> > >Bullshit. Cannot be confirmed scientifically. CO2 causing all this IR >absorption. And even if it did, you obviously cannot do the most basic >arithmatic on heat capacity and thermodynamics or you would see that it >is IMPOSSIBLE FOR CO2 warm the ocean. It warms the atmosphere which in turn warms the ocean. > Get back with your liitle >boyfriends and make up some better lies on how CO2 traps all this heat >which can't be DETECTED. Are you stupid? >It ain't gonna fly you saying that we just >have to believe little dishonest runt school boys like you. Do you >believe your own lies. Like the one you tell that you're and educated >person. > Believe the science, fool. >Kent Deatherage >
From: Orator on 25 Aug 2006 21:59 hanson wrote: What I say is this - PLONK - And no, that isn't a ref to a cheap Ch?teau Cardboard!
From: Sorcerer on 25 Aug 2006 22:00 Ok... *plonk* That IS a reference to a cheap Ch?teau troll. "Orator" <Orator(a)troll.bridge.net> wrote in message news:IVNHg.18045$rP1.17226(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au... | hanson wrote: | | | What I say is this | | - PLONK - | | And no, that isn't a ref to a cheap Ch?teau Cardboard!
From: kdthrge on 26 Aug 2006 00:33
Hoggle wrote: > The phrase you are looking for, Kent, is 'I'm sorry, I got albedo > backwards and am not a scientific prodigy after all' Well I am no prodigy of anyone and I probably am wrongabout this detail. I am glad you pointed it out. I guess that does make sense. Because then you can use it as a co-effecient. My math is not as good as it was twenty five years ago. Kent Deatherage |