Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 7 Nov 2006 08:38 unsettled wrote: > "Innovator. One who recognizes opportunities and > organizes resources to take advantage of the opportunity." > > That's *not* an employee. It certainly could be. Graham
From: T Wake on 7 Nov 2006 08:40 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eiq060$8qk_009(a)s900.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <GsSdnfyAiLgRp9LYnZ2dnUVZ8sSdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>news:einbk7$8qk_007(a)s943.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> In article <454C9C11.F26D71E5(a)hotmail.com>, >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >Do you guys not have fireplaces any more ? >>>>> >>>>> Only for show. >>>> >>>>I have 3 working ones. >>> >>> I have one that is functional. But it doesn't do anything useful. >>> I can't cook nor heat with it. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Are you saying that it's OK to pollute the air for heating? >>>> >>>>A good stove can be 90% efficient. >>> >>> That's not good enough if you're burning wood. >> >>What efficiency would you require for burning wood? > > No smoke at all. What percentage would that require? Which laws of physics have to be circumvented?
From: Eeyore on 7 Nov 2006 08:50 Ken Smith wrote: > T Wake <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > >> Nobody's appeasing anyone not suggesting they should do. > > > >unsettled (and those like him) have no case to put forward. As a result they > >have to rely on scare terms such as the ubiquitous "Nazi" reference, mixed > >in with what they view as cutting insults. > > > >How can you be an appeaser when there is no Nazi state to appease? > > There really is something that looks a lot like appeasing. Closing the > Prince Sultan Airbase in 2003 sort of quacks like appeasement of the > extremists. If by extremists you mean the population of Saudi I guess you're right. Graham
From: Eeyore on 7 Nov 2006 09:00 lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > "Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message > > > There really is something that looks a lot like appeasing. Closing the > > Prince Sultan Airbase in 2003 sort of quacks like appeasement of the > > extremists. > > The extremists I think we really need to stop appeasing are the Religious > Right and the Republicans who they are currently leading around by the nose. > Tomorrow's our chance. Good luck with that ! I'll be watching with great interest. Graham
From: Ben Newsam on 7 Nov 2006 08:02
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 04:45:15 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >The America that has been handed to you on a silver >platter, in fact. Oh dear, I do hope not. I thought we[1] had got rid of all those tiresome colonials long ago. >I'm happy to appease them forever. Their ideology has >withstood the test of time, while yours keeps failing >only to be recycled by the next generation. So, what is it about recycling every generation that isn't "standing the test of time"? [1] In case you hadn't noticed, not everyone lives in America. |