Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: lucasea on 7 Nov 2006 10:01 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eipt15$8qk_002(a)s900.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <454FA606.6BE1BCE2(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >> >>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> > >>> > My state is going to have an all Democrat political system with >>> > no checks nor balances. >>> >>> ...and yet somehow you completely fail to see how unhealthy that has >>> been >>> for the entire country. >> >>She doesn't think that Republicans require any checks and balances. That's >>what's really scary as they gradually dismantlke the provisions of the US >>Constitution ! > > The Republicans do not have a voting majority in Congress. What planet are you living on????? Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 7 Nov 2006 10:03 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eipt9a$8qk_003(a)s900.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <einm2q$4me$1(a)blue.rahul.net>, > kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>In article <ein6vl$8qk_002(a)s943.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>[....] >>>My state is going to have an all Democrat political system with >>>no checks nor balances. The guy running for governor is promising >>>to break the 2.5% property tax mandate, eliminating the high >>>school graduation test, increase the income tax (against >>>another taxpayer mandate), and somehow thinks that all this >>>new tax income will create jobs. >> >>What is he going to spend the money on? > > AFAICT, raising taxes. He's going to spend the money raising taxes....riiiiiight. You really do need to learn how government works. Eric Lucas
From: Eeyore on 7 Nov 2006 10:05 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > >You might be more convincing in this statement if you were to stop blindly > >spouting the Republicans' fear-mongering talking points. > > If the Republicans mention a fact, you automatically believe it's > a lie. When non-Republicans mention the same fact, you > automatically catagorize them as blind and aping Rep. statements > of fact. > > This thinking is illogical. Reverse Rep and Dem and you've just described yourself. Graham
From: Lloyd Parker on 7 Nov 2006 04:28 In article <eiprjo$8ss_003(a)s900.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >In article <einool$7gj$10(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, > lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >>In article <eikp37$8qk_001(a)s1014.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>In article <QqSdnTiCZpUVWtHYRVnyuQ(a)pipex.net>, >>> >>>Neither will work efficiently nor deliver service on demand. You >>>have to plan how to be sick or have somebody do it for you. That >>>is why people who are very ill have to have a patient advocate. >>>These were not needed before this medical insurance business >>>became a right instead of a benefit. >>> >>>Canada's system does not work for a certain class of services. >>>People who need those services were able to come to the US and >>>get them in a timely manner. When the US converts to a >>>single payer system, like Canada, the Canadians and the USians >>>who need these services will have to go to another country >>>whose medical infrastructure will provide. >> >>Right now, a number of Americans are going to ... India for medical care. >>Care to explain why? > >Because our medical system is changing to a national health run >by many chiefs. Since all that paper pushing has to be funded, >monies are going to bureaucracies rather than infrastructure >and labor. The workers are now union; so that adds to labor costs. What? The people who fill out paperwork at insurance companies? No way. Unions have few such clerical workers as members. >All access to medical help is done through insurance company >doors. These people are going to India because (1) they don't have insurance and American medicine costs too much, or (2) their insurance won't cover what they need to have done. >Doctors are no longer small business[wo]men and the business >is no longer a local business. > >/BAH >
From: Lloyd Parker on 7 Nov 2006 04:29
In article <eipt15$8qk_002(a)s900.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >In article <454FA606.6BE1BCE2(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >> >>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> > >>> > My state is going to have an all Democrat political system with >>> > no checks nor balances. >>> >>> ...and yet somehow you completely fail to see how unhealthy that has been >>> for the entire country. >> >>She doesn't think that Republicans require any checks and balances. That's >>what's really scary as they gradually dismantlke the provisions of the US >>Constitution ! > >The Republicans do not have a voting majority in Congress. Uh, they have more than 50% of the House and Senate. Except for the few things the Constitution requires to be by supermajorities, that IS a voting majority. >The have just enough of a majority to be chairpeople of >committees and nothing else. The Democrats here are already >measuring the new curtains. > >/BAH |