Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Lloyd Parker on 7 Nov 2006 04:31 In article <eipv7t$8qk_003(a)s900.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >In article <cXH3h.6200$B31.5579(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>news:ein8p9$8qk_001(a)s943.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> In article <zNSdnSXXb4_BIdHYnZ2dnUVZ8sydnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, >>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: ><snip> > >>> If this conflict becomes a war against Islam, all factions will >>> cooperate with each other temporarily. Why do you think Al >>> Queda is trying to make this a war against Islam? >> >>And exactly why have we decided to act in such a way as to make those claims >>credible to many Middle Eastern Muslims? > >We removed the Arab leader who attacked other Arabs and intended to >do it again. Why is that our job? Why is that worth the lives of 2300 Americans? Why is that worth around a trillion dollars? >The middle eastern Muslims would have the opposite opinion. >> >>>>Unsettled is talking nonsense and creating more strawmen than usual here. >>>>Siding with him on this does your argument no good. >>> >>> Will you get it through your head that I am not siding with anybody >>> except myself? >> >>You might be more convincing in this statement if you were to stop blindly >>spouting the Republicans' fear-mongering talking points. > >If the Republicans mention a fact, you automatically believe it's >a lie. When non-Republicans mention the same fact, you >automatically catagorize them as blind and aping Rep. statements >of fact. > >This thinking is illogical. > >/BAH
From: Eeyore on 7 Nov 2006 10:09 T Wake wrote: > <hill(a)rowland.org> wrote in message > news:1162901489.499250.295790(a)e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com... > > Winfield Hill wrote: > >> > >> 4200 postings and still going strong. Amazing. > > > > Wow, now 7200 posts and still going strong. And most > > of the posts were under the original subject title. This > > must be some kind of a record. Certainly it's a stress > > test for the Google Groups web-page display code, etc. > > > > I suspect there is no "end state" for the remaining die hard participants. > Some (unsettled) have arrived late and do little but insult, but for the > rest ... well it could go on for some time ... > > I was wondering how this would affect GoogleGroups. I seem to remember its > interface was clumsy for anything more than about 100 post threads. I may > have to check it out there :-) Clumsy is putting it mildly ! 7185 posts on Google currently. Graham
From: Eeyore on 7 Nov 2006 10:12 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >> Then he didn't mix with the usual US types. He only saw a slice > >> of US. > > > >What are 'the usual US types' ? > > To get a genuine idea on the least amount of time, grocery stores > can provide that infomation. A better place is the farms. What percentage of the population live on farms ? I'd prefer pubs / bars. Graham
From: Eeyore on 7 Nov 2006 10:13 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > In addition, people burn the wood that is laced with arsenic. What kind of wood is laced with arsenic ? Graham
From: unsettled on 7 Nov 2006 10:15
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > In article <cXH3h.6200$B31.5579(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>You might be more convincing in this statement if you were to stop blindly >>spouting the Republicans' fear-mongering talking points. > If the Republicans mention a fact, you automatically believe it's > a lie. When non-Republicans mention the same fact, you > automatically catagorize them as blind and aping Rep. statements > of fact. > This thinking is illogical. See, I think 34 words to tell him he's an idiot is a waste of ascii and boring. |