Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 3 Oct 2006 17:14 "Gordon" <gordonlr(a)DELETEswbell.net> wrote in message news:57d5i21spajr15qtdavgd63em37bvhd42c(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:47:09 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>Frithiof Andreas Jensen wrote: >> >>> <mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu> wrote in message >>> >>> > We did change the behavior of Germany and Japan, didn't we? >>> >>> At the cost of maybe 20% of the German population >> >>About 10% actually. >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties >> >>> - which clearly noone is >>> willing to pay yet in the middle east; mainly because it would look >>> really bad >>> on TeeVee. If one is not going to fight for real and destroy the >>> opponents there >>> is really, really no point in sending soldiers. >> >>< snip > >> >>> I.M.O: If WW2 was conducted the same way, we would be still be busy >>> knocking >>> over small groups of Waffen SS while talking about our "deep respect" >>> for >>> Neo-German culture and the historic achievements of Hitler (all the >>> while buying >>> German products to prop up the failing plundocracy)! >> >>There's no comparison since no Muslim country is actually at war with us, >>imagined >>or otherwise. >> >>Graham >> > Graham, are you saying that the events on the following list were > just fun and games, and not to be construed as war in any form? I > don't agree. It seems to me that 23 years of "turning the other > cheek" was enough. It was time to put an end to this kind of > irresponsible brutality. > Which country are you suggesting was responsible? It is terrorist tactics, not war. When the Red Army Faction were bombing US bases in Germany, did you go to war with the Germans?
From: T Wake on 3 Oct 2006 17:17 "Ben Newsam" <ben.newsam(a)ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news:20b3i2dr9p8qf7jhh81uugu4vbv76ua83o(a)4ax.com... > On 29 Sep 2006 09:06:40 -0700, science_for_jihad(a)yahoo.com wrote: > >> The CV should contain information >>reflecting the academic level reached by the candidate and his work >>experience. The information however should not be so accurate as to >>identify the candidate. An appropriately fantasious nickname and a >>birth date corresponding to the approximate age of the candidate should >>also be provided > > LOL! For a troll it certainly brought in a LOT of posts :-)
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 17:18 T Wake wrote: > The key is removing the lifeblood of the terrorists. Without this, it will > never end. Their lifeblood is quite simply injustices ( real or perceived ). Can you remove them ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 17:19 T Wake wrote: > If we stick to the WWII analogy, > the French resistance were certainly terrorists More like insurgents in fact. Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 17:20
T Wake wrote: > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote > > John Fields wrote: > >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:50:11 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > >> >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >> >> "T Wake" writes: > >> >> > >> >> >The victory conditions are either nonsensical or nonachievable. Has > >> >> >any "War > >> >> >on Terror" been won? > >> >> > > >> >> The term "War on Terror" is a misnomer. It really should be "The war > >> >> on Islamic extremism". Terror is just a tool. > >> > > >> >Obfuscation noted. > >> > > >> >So, are you saying it's possible to win a 'war on Islamic extremism' ? > >> > >> --- > >> We won the one on German extremism so who's to say it's not possible > >> to win this one? > > > > The Nazi party was genuinely popular. > > In the Early Days, then when popularity showed signs of wavering the "Enemy" > appeared. Eh ? > Labour party.... > > Scarily, they are a socialist party which have grown strong nationalistic > tendencies.... > > (OK, I will stop now. I will probably even vote Labour at the next > election....) You think labour is Socialist ???? Graham |