Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 12 Nov 2006 09:19 In article <rdqbl2pjilequsoc6s3hq0vm3j31162rtj(a)4ax.com>, Ben Newsam <ben.newsam(a)ukonline.co.uk> wrote: >On Sat, 11 Nov 06 13:20:21 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>My knowledge about how things works cannot be used. My experience >>cannot be used. > >How can you expect to win an argument when you take the wrong side? ><g> I don't expect to win. I do intend to learn. It's been very difficult to glean much from this thread. There are nuggets but it takes an enormous amount of energy to find them. My usual screening procedures cannot be used in this thread. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 12 Nov 2006 09:25 In article <4556149D.6BA6B1AC(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> The complaint is valid. The message the Democrat leadership >> is sending to all the Islamic extremists is that they tacitly >> approve and won't retaliate. > >You have to be joking ? > >Do you *seriously* think that ? It is a fact. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 12 Nov 2006 09:31 In article <4em5h.2414$6t.70(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:ej4l1b$8ss_033(a)s977.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <4555374F.EF500B95(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>krw wrote: >>> >>>> rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>>> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > Raising the minimum wage is stupid and insane. >>>> > >>>> > Why ? >>>> >>>> Why should the federal government tell anyone what their worth is? >>>> > >>>> > I saw it can be a slow as $5 an hour. >>>> >>>> The federal minimum wage is $5.15/hr. Some states are higher >>>> (Vermont is $7.25 and going up). I'm not sure anyone really works >>>> for the minimum (MacD's is advertising $9.00/hr.). >>> >>>So why the fuss over increasing what would seem to be a notional minimum ? >>> >> >> You should notice that Keith is swearing. That is not is usual >> style. I guess he's got the same problems I have. > >Yes, defending an untenable position against data and logic will cause one >to do that. Actually, the problem is property taxes doubling and then quadrupling every four or five years. And we in Mass. passed a 2.5% cap. The governor people just elected has promised to undo it. > > >>AS minimum >> wage goes skyhigh, > >This is disingenuous. Nobody is suggesting it go "sky high". The >contemplated increase, the first such in something like 20 years, is about >$2, or about $20. In that time, inflation has gone up nearly 100%. I'd say >that's a rather modest increase. Are you saying that there is no correltation between a minimum wage increase and living expense increases? I say there is a correlation. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 12 Nov 2006 09:37 In article <jhobl2tesok74154iqpoaannrd0jtn5prm(a)4ax.com>, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:38:41 +0000, Eeyore ><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>That roast Iraqi baby in your oven's ready for eating. > >--- >Wow! > >Seems you've latched onto a subject you really like! John, this is another example of that odd behavior I've been mentioning once in a while. Muslims teach their young that that non-Muslims are baby eaters. And now we see somebody using the same approach to prove that there is no danger. /BAH
From: unsettled on 12 Nov 2006 09:42
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > In article <v76dnSNVabJ4h8vYnZ2dnUVZ8v2dnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>news:ej4hah$8ss_014(a)s977.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> >>>In article <45537045.AC5FCFC6(a)hotmail.com>, >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Something approaching 20% of the people in our country can't afford any >>> >>>sort >>> >>>>>of health care. To say that "ain't broke" is one of the most morally >>> >>>bereft >>> >>>>>statements I've heard in a very, very long time. Congratulations, >>>>>you've >>>>>demonstrated the lack of a conscience along with a lack of a brain. >>>> >>>>BAH may not be aware that it was a social conscience that drove Britain to >>> >>>look >>> >>>>at the possibility of a National Health Service. >>> >>>Britain is a single country and has a "small" acreage. The US >>>is 50 "countries" span a quarter hemisphere. >> >>So what? > > > You people honestly can't see the difference? They're not science oriented, so they don't understand scale. |