Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 4 Oct 2006 16:49 "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message news:gvTUg.51409$E67.10236(a)clgrps13... > > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:efvurj$8ss_006(a)s811.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > >> Which criticism was unacceptable? >> >> I don't understand you people; first you complain that he can't >> think for himself; then, you object when he expresses his opinion about >> something. >> >> You can't have it both ways. > > Can too. > > Criticizing Bush for his lack of thought is really criticizing Bush. > > Criticizing Bush for his 'thoughts' is really criticizing Cheney. > LOL.
From: John Fields on 4 Oct 2006 16:47 On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 23:11:29 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > >"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >news:a6p5i2dauerugsd1ojked6ti9db04pdini(a)4ax.com... > >> BTW, you might have noticed we sent Saddam Hussein back to his own >> country to be tried there instead of us giving him a fair trial and >> executing him here. Big of us, huh? > >You wouldn't want him calling all of his former friends in the current US >administration as witnesses now, would you? --- Sure. Why not? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Eeyore on 4 Oct 2006 16:51 T Wake wrote: > "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote > > Jim Thompson wrote: > >> > >> I should know shortly what low-life job Eric has at Battelle... my > >> guess is janitor ;-) > > > > > > Are you sure they would give him that much responsibility? > > > It is interesting that instead of disagreeing with Eric's comments and > explaining why, the general response has been to criticise his imagined work > status. > > Nothing I have seen in this thread seems to relate to his job and he has not > claimed professional authority based on his employment so what, on Earth, > does his job matter? > > Unless this really is a pathetic attempt to "one up" on someone you think is > in a lower paid / less "exalted" job. If it is, you really should be ashamed > of yourselves. Thompson and Terrell are amongst the lowest forms of life posting here. JoeBloe beats them hands down though. Graham
From: T Wake on 4 Oct 2006 16:52 "Keith" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message news:MPG.1f8dd6c6ae306000989d7b(a)News.Individual.NET... > In article <zKKdnSzN97hrlbnYnZ2dnUVZ8qWdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, > usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com says... >> >> "Keith" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message >> news:MPG.1f8db9d68e963bff989d6e(a)News.Individual.NET... >> > In article <%8RUg.8425$GR.1728(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>, >> > lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says... >> >> >> >> "Keith" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message >> >> news:MPG.1f8d949b973606e3989d61(a)News.Individual.NET... >> >> > >> >> >> > Oh, you mean like the Reagen and Clinton administrations did with >> >> >> > Osama >> >> >> > bin Laden when he was fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan? >> >> >> >> >> >> Sadly, yes. >> >> > >> >> > Another idiot heard from. >> >> >> >> You don't believe that former administrations provided substantial >> >> support >> >> to two people/organizations who have subsequently turned against the >> >> US? >> >> You need to read more, it's well-known. >> > >> > It's well known that the Quarterbacking on Monday morning is much >> > better than that on Sunday afternoon too. What a maroon! >> >> What a response. You are truly at the cutting edge of debate Sir. > > It is an observation that happens to be germane here. Want another > one? 20:20 hindsight is perfect. Thank you. Please, keep them coming. I will collect them into a book and publish it one day. >> As you don't really say anything except phrases used by others, can I >> assume >> from this you think previous US administrations didn't train and equip >> Usma >> Bin Laden and the Taleban during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan? > > No, I don't. OBL <> Northern Alliance. Well, the debate over Usama's support not withstanding, the US did actively support the Taleban who were "created" by the Pakistani's (that great ally in the war). All part of the quest to oust the commies. >> Or are you just trying to impress your friends with the funny quotes you >> can >> copy and paste? > > I've certainly impressed you out of your hole. Wow. You are brilliant. I don't care what everyone else says about you, I think you are funny.
From: T Wake on 4 Oct 2006 16:53
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45240FD2.B01A0C3D(a)hotmail.com... > > > John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: >> >> T Wake wrote: >> >> > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> >> >> T Wake wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> The same reason unthinking Muslims support groups considered >> >> >>> terrorist by >> >> >>> the west. >> >> >> >> >> >> Is Hezbollah a terrorist organisation ? >> >> > >> >> > If you are asking my opinion..... then yes. A nasty, ruthless one. >> >> > However >> >> > sometimes terrorists seem to come in from the cold. >> >> >> >> That's the point at which they've won. >> > >> >Looks like they won in that case. >> >> --- >> A skirmish, perhaps, but not the war. > > Israel can only 'win' by erasing Lebanon. > > Is that what you want ? > What alternative do they have? Until the Palestinians and Arabs can accept Israel's existence, Israel can not hold off on its defensive posture. Do you advocate Israel surrender? |