Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: lucasea on 4 Oct 2006 17:32 "Keith" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message news:MPG.1f8dd485be8e903f989d78(a)News.Individual.NET... > In article <0h18i21ket4s0m5rkk8gckp0kk4oih33hh(a)4ax.com>, To-Email- > Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com says... >> On Wed, 04 Oct 06 14:48:36 GMT, lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) >> wrote: >> >> >In article <MPG.1f8db6b8105f0bb9989d69(a)News.Individual.NET>, >> > Keith <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >> [snip] >> >> >> >>Phones (of the domestic type, anyway) aren't tapped without >> >>warrant. Get with the program. >> >> >> > >> >Tapped? That's semantics. How does the NSA know a call is going to >> >involve >> >someone of interest? They monitor all calls and a computer "listens" >> >for >> >certain key words and phrases. >> > >> [snip] >> >> That's rarely the case, and not without warrant. >> >> What NSA was doing was using computer perusal of telephone _records_, >> "To/From" data. >> >> From those suspicious records, taps were authorized by a judge. > > YEs, and the foreign "taps" were intercepted calls from > "interesting" foreign numbers. They were not taps on phones. I don't care. If you're listening to a phone call to which the phone in my living room is party, then as a citizen of the US, I demand that your listening be carried out according to my Constitutional rights.
From: Eeyore on 4 Oct 2006 17:34 John Fields wrote: > On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 23:33:31 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > >John Fields wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:05:58 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > > >> >The only violently inclined ppl in this thread > >> >are yourself, Thompson and Terrell. Violent even to the point of making personal > >> >threats. > >> > >> --- > >> Show where I made a personal threat. > > > >Can you not read ? 'even to' doesn't have to include you. > > --- > Nor then does it have to include Thompson or Terrell, so who were > you leveling the accusation at, specifically? It would have to include at least one of them. > Or are you going to try to backpedal your way out of this one, too? Don't be so utterly pathetic. Graham
From: Daniel Mandic on 4 Oct 2006 17:34 Eeyore wrote: > Thompson and Terrell are amongst the lowest forms of life posting > here. JoeBloe beats them hands down though. > > Graham Ermm, is Terrell not an electronic guru? Best Regards, Daniel Mandic
From: John Fields on 4 Oct 2006 17:34 On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:29:32 -0500, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:42:54 +0100, Eeyore ><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>Homer J Simpson wrote: >> >>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote >>> >>> > Alternatively you could put every mosque under armed guard and provide >>> > them with no end of support.... :-) >>> >>> Or move them all to the Outer Hebrides - and the Muslims with them! >> >>With such a wide selection to choose from, I often wonder why we have no >>prison islands. > >--- >You do. It's called Australia. > >>You could make the prisoners actually work the land and stuff. >>You never know, it might do them good. > >--- >They certainly seem to be doing better than you lot, lately. --- P.S. One Australian friend of mine says he'll be eternally grateful to you for giving them Heaven and keeping Hell for yourselves. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Eeyore on 4 Oct 2006 17:36
Keith wrote: > In article <IjTUg.51405$E67.42536(a)clgrps13>, nobody(a)nowhere.com > says... > > "Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message. > > > > >>Clinton was successful. > > >> > > >>Bush is a failure. > > > > > > Unless you assume some really bad things about his motives that is. > > > > 9/11 was Bush's failure. > > You are your mother's failure. Bwahahahahahahahaha ! Are you always this retarded ? Graham |