Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 13 Jan 2007 10:02 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >They'd be mad to use them [nukes] offensively. > >> > >> In your opinion, they will be mad. In their opinion, they > >> will be good obedient Muslims. > >> > >> This is what the conflict is about. > > > >Do elaborate ! > > I have been. You have been ignoring every thing I wrote because > none of it fits into your world view of how things should be. As ever you can't answer a straight question. You 'hint' at ideas that exist purely in your own mind. Come on out and say openly and clearly what you mean without resorting to some weird 'code'. Graham
From: Eeyore on 13 Jan 2007 10:05 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >>Sigh! I see nobody trusting the President. > > > >Yes, most people have more sense than you. > > I do not trust him blindly. He is the only one in > Washington who seems to be trying deal with the real problem. Good Lord ! He and his ilk *MADE* the problem !!!! Graham
From: Eeyore on 13 Jan 2007 10:06 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > > > >I'm open to hearing about some other model. There's no one to > >negotiate with, so what's left? > > Changing mindsets. It took WWI and WWII to change a certain > mindset; this was all under the rules of engagement, European-style. > Those rules are no longer valid because the enemy hasn't agreed > to follow them; it will never agree to follow them because they're > heretical. There is no enemy to negotiate with. At least you *could* negotiate with the IRA ! Graham
From: Eeyore on 13 Jan 2007 10:16 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > >T Wake wrote: > >> "MassivePong" <MassivePong(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote > >>>Eeyore<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >>>>MassivePong wrote: > >>>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >>>>> > >>>>>>Armies are no good for this. > >>>>> > >>>>> You're an idiot. We are there to train them, and clean up the arms > >>>>>stockpiles. We'll be coming home soon enough. > >>>> > >>>>Armies are for fighting wars. Armies are not policemen. > >>> > >>> Peanut gallery mutterings don't get anything done about the problem > >>>either. Don't try to mutter that there isn't one either. There's a > >>>big problem. It is not like cleaning up a town with a biker problem. > >>> > >>> Those boys got big toys, and we have to counter that, and you need > >>>to get that past that 4 inches of bone, donkey skull. > >> > >> Nothing you have said, ad hominems or otherwise, disagrees with anything > >> Eeyore said. Armies are for fighting wars. Police are very different. The > >> hard ware the enemy has is not relevant no matter how you try to include > >> it. > > > >So what you and the dumb donkey are saying is that we now > >need to revitalize a police model based on the Gestapo? > > Will you please note that they are saying that the United > Nations (or whatever an organization of all countries is called) > should do this. No. I never mentioned the United Nations. That's not a suitable course of action. It would perhaps help to get it involved long term if possible though. Graham
From: Eeyore on 13 Jan 2007 10:20
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >ADSL works on *radio* frequencies. You can monitor connection progress on > >your router's status page of course. > > So the comm traffic on DSL can be monitored; data can be gathered. > You can turn that into sound instead of numbers in pretty columns. If you felt it served any purpose perhaps. Graham |