Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: MassiveProng on 13 Jan 2007 12:17 On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:29:44 -0000, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"MassiveProng" <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in >message news:qqgeq25oqqb4hjhepj0ncbu9g3q7a82gmg(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:01:32 +0000, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >> >>>MassiveProng wrote: >>> >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >>>> >>>> >> There is. It's called the Worldwide Struggle Against Terrorism, >>>> > >>>> >It isn't worldwide. It's certainly no longer called a 'war on terror' >>>> >in the UK >>>> >for one thing. >>>> >>>> Tell that to the Somalians. Those in power there now are certainly >>>> on the "war against terror" bandwagon, and obviously countless other >>>> countries you are unaware of. You are unaware of so much... >>> >>>Have you forgotten already that there are always at least 2 sides in every >>>dispute ? >>>One man's 'terrorist' is another's 'freedom fighter'. >> >> Are you trying to say that the invading Islamic factions that over >> ran Somalia > >Where did they invade from? > >> deserved to be there as they were "fighting" for "their >> freedom"???? > >No, learn to read his post before jumping in. Eeyore said one mans terrorist >is another's freedom fighter. There are lots of Somalis who look to the >Islamic Courts Union as saviours from the "government" of thugs and war >lords who cruelly oppressed them. The ICU (like most terrorists trying to >legitimise themselves) played up to this and built schools, bridges etc., >which the government forces tried to take over. > >There are lots of "ordinary" Somalis who think the ICU are a good thing. >Just because you and I think of them as "terrorists" does not mean the term >has an abstract, definite, value. > >> They were not fighting. They were raping and pillagin', son. > >The ICU were doing lots of things. > >> Do you know what the word "pirate" means? They were not considered >> military combatants either. They were immediate targets for death, >> and considered rogue criminal, despite any hardware they were sailing >> in/with... military or otherwise. > >Is it still the seventeenth century? The Geneva Convention on the High Seas >describes piracy in articles 14 - 22 of the 1958 convention and in summary, >pirates are to be detained for international trial and their goods may be >seized by what ever signatory power seizes their ships. > >More importantly, what has piracy got to do with anything? > Ships... cars... trucks... doesn't seem to be much difference between a sea of water and a sea of dessert to me.
From: Ken Smith on 13 Jan 2007 12:19 In article <MJ6dna3Se70QfTXYnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, T Wake <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: [....] >Can you hook a speaker up to an ethernet cable? Technically yes you can. You can also plumb it to the kitchen sink. Both are about as useful. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Ken Smith on 13 Jan 2007 12:26 In article <45A7CF62.BAA8ED7F(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> > >> >> Sigh! I see nobody trusting the President. >> > >> >After all the lies he's told and laws he's broken, who in their right >mind would >> >? >> >> It is well documented that some fraction of mankind is not in its right >> mind. Democracy tends to wash their affect out over the long term. It >> isn't the perfect answer because you can have the "one person one vote one >> time" situation where people will elect someone who will destroy the >> democracy. > >1930s Germany even ! Democracy only "tends" to not elect people like him. Without it, we'd have more of them. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Ken Smith on 13 Jan 2007 12:28 In article <75ce2$45a7b6cb$4fe7610$13687(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> In article <eo81fp$8qk_005(a)s788.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >> [....] >> >>>Sigh! I see nobody trusting the President. >> >> >> I sure do! It is down to a smaller fraction now that he has shown how >> thunderingly incompetent he is, but there are still some. > >What about the people who elected him, twice! Most of them have wised up. He and his type are not very popular any more. [....] >> Now that the democrats have been elected, there is going to be some >> sorting out of problems. The previous crew where a complete rubberstamp. > >You're going to see an awful lot of rubberstamping >by the Democrats. Anything less than 100% will be an improvement. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: MassiveProng on 13 Jan 2007 12:28
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:31:52 -0000, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > The >hard ware the enemy has is not relevant no matter how you try to include it. > Bullshit. It is ALL about the hardware and always has been from monkeys with bones to Chinese and rockets (centuries ago). It IS all about the hardware, no matter how you (or they) try to make it not includible. They claim they want to go back to their idea of "fundamentals", with no radios or technology, etc., yet they need and use technology to facilitate their efforts, and would readily take up any goods remaining after they "conquer" in their murderous, anarchistic way. They are true scum. You need to see that. They do NOT get to hide behind the armor of a claim that they are backed by their religion, because they are not backed by their religion. You giving them any credence whatsoever can cost lives. |