Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Ken Smith on 20 Jan 2007 12:00 In article <eot7bl$8qk_016(a)s768.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: [...] >Having a forced increase at the same time the agriculture crops >are failing is the exact wrong thing to do at the wrong time. But that hasn't happened here in California. The minimum wage is higher than most other states and has been for some time. The economy is booming. We don't have an unemployment problem worth speaking of. California has a high minimum wage, more PHDs, more patents, most of the orange crop, the women are strong, the men are good looking and all of the children are above average. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: MassiveProng on 20 Jan 2007 12:15 On Mon, 15 Jan 07 14:33:19 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >Routers, and thus firewalls, are not immune. Routers and HARDWARE based firewalls, as are the like in routers, are the least susceptible. OS based software firewalls are vulnerable by the very nature of their location -within the OS-. Linux based firewalls are a bit different -by the very nature of how Linux works-. It is almost set up as a routing server. VERY secure. The OS based firewall is the least secure. > The guaranteed final >block is the human who can switch the power off the modem (or >computer) when unwanted bits make it through. You have no way of monitoring when and what bits are "good" or "bad". It is too time intensive, and you cannot possibly keep up. >This is even more important now since backdoors are deemed >a requirement on certain PCs. Huh?
From: Lloyd Parker on 20 Jan 2007 07:56 In article <eot6fb$8qk_011(a)s768.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >In article <eot3p3$8qk_001(a)s768.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>In article <825vq21dvqu6lrc1e1copqmj63j3nn34t7(a)4ax.com>, >> Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote: ><snip> > >>>>Spain seems to be slow to respond even after the trains were >>>>blown up. >>> >>>I remember some of this. What do you mean here by "slow to respond?" >> >>Spain has just started to recover, politically and economically, >>from the mess stirred by the Nazis. They have to take great >>care when investigating the messes just in case the mess was >>made by their home-grown terrorists [or whatever they call them]. >> >>>By this question, I mean both 'slow' and also what you feel was >>>inadequate about the response. >> >>Not inadequate, AFAIK, but slow because they had to tread lightly >>to avoid another internal civil fight. > >I just remembered that the reason I started watching Spain is >because they were the first European country to submit to >Islamic extremists' blackmail and promised to withdraw their >troops after the train bombing. > >I do not know the status of this one. > > ><snip> > >/BAH Public opinion in Spain, as in every European country, wanted withdrawal. And Spain at first blamed the bombings on the Basques; hardly what a country would do if they were going to give in right away.
From: Phil Carmody on 20 Jan 2007 15:41 Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > Spain has just started to recover, politically and economically, > > from the mess stirred by the Nazis. > > What ! ???? Another barking mad leap into the unkown from BAH. > > I'm lost for words. > > Do please elaborate BAH, this should be a real corker. /me gets popcorn Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./.
From: Eeyore on 20 Jan 2007 17:07
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > I just remembered that the reason I started watching Spain is > because they were the first European country to submit to > Islamic extremists' blackmail and promised to withdraw their > troops after the train bombing. So what would you have done ? Graham |