Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 20 Jan 2007 08:50 In article <45B21B8E.CEB3FB52(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> > >> >>France didn't act until the field tests of urban riots happened. >> > >> >I vaguely recollect something here, but again need details. >> >> This was last summer. France had urban riots and seemed to >> be out of their Muslim workers. But the only people who seemed >> to be making messes were the kids. > >They're the ones most pissed off because they can't get jobs or maybe only menial >ones. Instead of voting or using other legal means, this culture riots and makes messes to get the attention of their government. A large part of the Muslim mindset change has to do with how they communicate with their rulers. This is probably the most important change that needs to happen. > >It's what they call 'social exclusion' and it probably does have some parallels >with the African Americans in the 60s. There are some. You should be more disturbed that the European union mentality isn't doing the work and you have to import your laborers. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 20 Jan 2007 08:52 In article <eopb3n$fei$3(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >In article <87949$45af8607$4fe7136$11131(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>Ken Smith wrote: >> >>> In article <45AF7DB2.FB13F663(a)hotmail.com>, >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> [.. Islamic extremists vs the law ..] >>> >>> >>>>They have no ability to undermine it. >>> >>> >>> That may be true in England but it seems in the US they have found a way >>> to undermine the law. It is quite a clever trick they are using. They >>> pretend to be christians, spread fear and then claim that the laws must be >>> undermined to make people safe. >> >>Cute, but paranoid. > >(Takes off tin foil hat and bows gracefully) > >Unfortunately, the theory fits too many of the facts of today. You should note that those types are watching, and will copy, the techniques that succeed. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 20 Jan 2007 08:54 In article <45B0D353.61496669(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> There happen to be a lot of people who think that, if the US >> >> >> plays by Geneva convention rules, the Islamic extremists will. >> >> > >> >> >Really ? I didn't hear anyone say that. >> >> >> >> You might try to read Carter's book. You might listen to >> >> Hillary Clinton. You might notice the places both she >> >> and Kerry have been visiting in the last few weeks. >> > >> >What has where they're visiting got to do about it ? Have they been visiting >> >extremists ? >> >> Yes. > >Which ones ? Why don't you find out for yourself? That way you might stumble across what these idiots have been announcing and saying, too. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 20 Jan 2007 08:57 In article <45B0D403.724737B0(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Expect BAH to now suggest that the agriculture in California is about to >> >> >collapse. >> >> >> >> It already has. Adding the burden of a minimum wage hike will >> >> make it worse. >> > >> >I truly don't believe it ! >> >> Now read the past few weeks' weather reports. > >What would I find there ? Snow and freezing temperatures. Sigh! You claimed that you knew more than I about the real news. So why haven't you heard nor learned about the two (California mess and Democrat leadership visits)? /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 20 Jan 2007 09:01
In article <eoqnck$aaq$3(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >In article <45B0D403.724737B0(a)hotmail.com>, >Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >[....] >>> Now read the past few weeks' weather reports. >> >>What would I find there ? > >You will find a bunch of folks in the LA area had trouble getting to their >jobs because of snow. Some largish fraction of the orange crop has been >frozen. The growers had the pickers working all the hours that had enough >light to see trying to pick the crop before it got damaged. The price of >oranges in the stores will go up because of this. > >The growers have taken a fairly big hit. They had to pay the pickers for >the overtime work but didn't get the normal yeld from their trees. The >fruit has the most money in it right now so this is the worst time for bad >things to happen, > >This weird weather we are seeing has cost the state a goodly bit of money. >A few people may have to put off buying a new car or live without seat >warmers. This tragedy of epic proportions has been caused by the weather, >which we all know was caused by the increase in minimum wages. The snot running down your chin does not become you. Having a forced increase at the same time the agriculture crops are failing is the exact wrong thing to do at the wrong time. The gal who is Speaker of House knows this (she had an exception put in for the tuna processing plant on Guam(?)) but they passed the bill anyway. This was irresponsible and stupid and an attempt to distract their voters from noticing they do not have any plans to deal with this problem we are now discussing. /BAH |