From: Eeyore on 20 Jan 2007 17:08 jasen wrote: > On 2007-01-15, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > I'm talking about monitoring without interfering with the performance. > > Any additional software you run will reduce performance (by using up > computer cycles and ram), wether the reduction is significant is upto > you to decide. if your computer is upto the task monitoring needn't > reduce your the speed of your internet connection. She's got a 486. SX25 CPU even maybe ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 20 Jan 2007 17:10 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote: > >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > > >> >>France didn't act until the field tests of urban riots happened. > >> > > >> >I vaguely recollect something here, but again need details. > >> > >> This was last summer. France had urban riots and seemed to > >> be out of their Muslim workers. But the only people who seemed > >> to be making messes were the kids. > > > >They're the ones most pissed off because they can't get jobs or maybe only > >menial ones. > > Instead of voting or using other legal means, There's no-one to vote for that has much interest in their concerns - least of all having any chance of being elected. Do you recall something about 'taxation without representation' and how that ended up ? There was some rioting involved IIRC ! Graham
From: Eeyore on 20 Jan 2007 17:12 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> There happen to be a lot of people who think that, if the US > >> >> >> plays by Geneva convention rules, the Islamic extremists will. > >> >> > > >> >> >Really ? I didn't hear anyone say that. > >> >> > >> >> You might try to read Carter's book. You might listen to > >> >> Hillary Clinton. You might notice the places both she > >> >> and Kerry have been visiting in the last few weeks. > >> > > >> >What has where they're visiting got to do about it ? Have they been > >> >visiting extremists ? > >> > >> Yes. > > > >Which ones ? > > Why don't you find out for yourself? That way you might stumble > across what these idiots have been announcing and saying, too. Because I'm not going to make any assumption about whom you had in mind. All you have to do is name a few of these extremists for me or simply shut up and stop making things up. Simple really. Graham
From: Eeyore on 20 Jan 2007 17:14 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >Expect BAH to now suggest that the agriculture in California is about > >> >> >to collapse. > >> >> > >> >> It already has. Adding the burden of a minimum wage hike will > >> >> make it worse. > >> > > >> >I truly don't believe it ! > >> > >> Now read the past few weeks' weather reports. > > > >What would I find there ? > > Snow and freezing temperatures. Sigh! You claimed that > you knew more than I about the real news. Since when is a local weather report *news* ??? > So why haven't you heard nor learned about the two (California mess and > Democrat leadership visits)? What's that got to do with anything ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 20 Jan 2007 17:15
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote: > >On Fri, 19 Jan 07 14:19:43 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >>The Taliban had their chance. > > > >When, exactly? > > The Taliban were asked to hand over the Al Queda leaders _before_ > the bombing of Afghanistan started. They refused. Now, do you > need a date for that? I'd like a cite for it for sure ! Graham |