Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 20 Jan 2007 08:36 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Spain has just started to recover, politically and economically, > from the mess stirred by the Nazis. What ! ???? Another barking mad leap into the unkown from BAH. I'm lost for words. Do please elaborate BAH, this should be a real corker. Graham
From: Eeyore on 20 Jan 2007 08:39 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >>France didn't act until the field tests of urban riots happened. > > > >I vaguely recollect something here, but again need details. > > This was last summer. France had urban riots and seemed to > be out of their Muslim workers. But the only people who seemed > to be making messes were the kids. They're the ones most pissed off because they can't get jobs or maybe only menial ones. It's what they call 'social exclusion' and it probably does have some parallels with the African Americans in the 60s. Graham
From: jmfbahciv on 20 Jan 2007 08:46 In article <eot3p3$8qk_001(a)s768.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >In article <825vq21dvqu6lrc1e1copqmj63j3nn34t7(a)4ax.com>, > Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote: <snip> >>>Spain seems to be slow to respond even after the trains were >>>blown up. >> >>I remember some of this. What do you mean here by "slow to respond?" > >Spain has just started to recover, politically and economically, >from the mess stirred by the Nazis. They have to take great >care when investigating the messes just in case the mess was >made by their home-grown terrorists [or whatever they call them]. > >>By this question, I mean both 'slow' and also what you feel was >>inadequate about the response. > >Not inadequate, AFAIK, but slow because they had to tread lightly >to avoid another internal civil fight. I just remembered that the reason I started watching Spain is because they were the first European country to submit to Islamic extremists' blackmail and promised to withdraw their troops after the train bombing. I do not know the status of this one. <snip> /BAH
From: jasen on 20 Jan 2007 06:47 On 2007-01-14, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > In article <8764b9myhm.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, > Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: >>> In article <CsGdncRAvqXihDTYnZ2dnUVZ8s2mnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, >>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>> You cannot monitor what is going back and forth over the line >>> _while you are working online_. >> >>Of course you can. You just need some kind of tap on the line. > That would change the behaviour, wouldn't it? I didn't think you > could tap an ethernet (I think we're still talking about ethernet) > cable in parallel. sure you can. it used to be dead easy when they were using coax, or hubs that repeated all signals to all stations. Bye. Jasen
From: jasen on 20 Jan 2007 07:04
On 2007-01-15, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > I'm talking about monitoring without interfering with the performance. Any additional software you run will reduce performance (by using up computer cycles and ram), wether the reduction is significant is upto you to decide. if your computer is upto the task monitoring needn't reduce your the speed of your internet connection. Bye. Jasen |