Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 20 Jan 2007 17:23 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote: > > >I was presenting the poll as one of at least a few different ones that > >I've noticed over the years on the subject -- in order to debate the > >issue that jmfbahciv (name would be appreciated, here) > > I'm know throughout the computer biz world as /BAH--it's my name > in the listings (code sources). Does the computer biz world also laugh at you for being stuck was an old 486 based PC ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 20 Jan 2007 17:24 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > I am highly allergic to poll outcomes as an convincing argument > about how popular an idea is. Because you'd rather believe the voices in your head I imagine. Graham
From: Eeyore on 20 Jan 2007 17:26 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Use eeyore's knowledge as a metric. If you learn that and then > listen to the BBC, which is proably his primary indirect source > of news, you can figure out a lot. I'd rather use the BBC as a news source which is under worldwide scrutiny than wherever you get your barking mad ideas from. I use multiple news sources in fact, including some right wing ones and a number of overseas sources. Graham
From: Eeyore on 20 Jan 2007 17:29 Ken Smith wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >Having a forced increase at the same time the agriculture crops > >are failing is the exact wrong thing to do at the wrong time. > > But that hasn't happened here in California. The minimum wage is higher > than most other states and has been for some time. The economy is > booming. We don't have an unemployment problem worth speaking of. > > California has a high minimum wage, more PHDs, more patents, most of the > orange crop, the women are strong, the men are good looking and all of the > children are above average. As does Sweden too for example. Low ( minimum ) wages are associated with poor ( performing ) economies. Graham
From: MassiveProng on 20 Jan 2007 17:34
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:24:19 +0000, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> I am highly allergic to poll outcomes as an convincing argument >> about how popular an idea is. > >Because you'd rather believe the voices in your head I imagine. > Sounds like you are into poles of a different nature. Bwuahahaha! |