From: Eeyore on 31 Jan 2007 09:13 unsettled wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >>I'll talk about the fighting that happened under Truman after WWII. > >>AT that time, none of the European free countries were in any > >>position to wage the coming fights that were to be called the > >>Cold War. Yet these same countries did not want Communism to > >>spread. So the US was the only country who had enough resources > >>to lead and do most of the supplying. > > > > > > It was the USA who was most concerned about communism spreading and it wasn't > > happening in Europe either. > > Europe victimized some of her own FDR agreed to it too. > by sacrificing a group of countries to Stalin forming a buffer between themselves > > and Communism. It wasn't a buffer though. > That's how frightened and concerned Europe was of the spread of Communism. That's the nuttiest thing I've heard recently that didn't come from BAH. > An interesting facet of that sacrifice is the on going > diminution of those nations by western Europe as part of > the self-justification process. Quite similarly the > Baltic Nations were also sacrificed because they held > no value to western Europe. Eh ? Graham
From: jmfbahciv on 31 Jan 2007 09:06 In article <kmrvr2172te9al1coe976aud3bb3s82j30(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Tue, 30 Jan 07 15:34:36 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >>>Compliance testing is routine these days. >> >>Not really. I have to unplug my stove to listen to AM radio. > > > What exactly do you attribute that to? > >Hint: > > It isn't your radio, and it isn't the stove. > > If you want to learn something, just ask. 1. Turn radio on to an AM station. 2. Plug in stove. 3. All radio AM stations have interference; most stations can no longer be heard. 4. Unplug stove. AM station interference clears up immediately. Experiment is 100% reproducible. I don't need error bars. /BAH
From: unsettled on 31 Jan 2007 09:13 Eeyore wrote: > > T Wake wrote: > > >>"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>No. If you go around opening the cage door on rabid pitbulls, you >>>>>>>are responsible for people getting bitten. >>>>>> >>>>>>I'm glad you agree with me about keeping these types locked up. >>>>> >>>>>It doesn't have to mean physically locked up. >>>> >>>>With today's transportation technology, it does. There is no >>>>Australia-type piece of land to keep them from making messes >>>>in other peoples' backyards. >>> >>>It's a shame there isn't a suitable island somewhere really. >>> >>>I'd prefer to see Islamist trouble makers deported to a Muslim country >>>rather than locked up. >> >>I doubt the Muslim country that was on the receiving end of these nutjobs >>would be too happy. > > > Tricky one isn't it ? > > I wonder if there are any suitable unoccupied Hebridean islands ? Why do you suppose Gitmo?
From: jmfbahciv on 31 Jan 2007 09:07 In article <cqrvr25071revcsdj1r31e9i7au4ui74j9(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Tue, 30 Jan 07 15:34:36 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >>> You don't need an anechoic chamber btw. >> >>How do you measure the EMF in "noisy" environments? >>Or don't you need numbers anymore? >>> >>> > > Device off, sensors read baseline noise reading. > > Device on, sensors read local differential. Extrapolations get >made, figures get arrived at. Task complete. No wonder my stove doesn't work. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 31 Jan 2007 09:08
In article <cqrvr25071revcsdj1r31e9i7au4ui74j9(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Tue, 30 Jan 07 15:34:36 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >>> You don't need an anechoic chamber btw. >> >>How do you measure the EMF in "noisy" environments? >>Or don't you need numbers anymore? >>> >>> > > Device off, sensors read baseline noise reading. > > Device on, sensors read local differential. Extrapolations get >made, figures get arrived at. Task complete. Your test has a big huge unfixable flaw. /BAH |