Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 31 Jan 2007 09:17 Eeyore wrote: > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > >>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Even a representative democracy needs to have some way to deal >>>>>>>>with the people who go after little kids, and make other kinds >>>>>>>>of messes. A democracy does not, and never has, meant that >>>>>>>>all people can do anything they want without punishment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Democracies create laws and enforce them to deal with such issues. >>>>>> >>>>>>Those laws apply to the citizens of that country during peace time. >>>>> >>>>>And in wartime too. >>>> >>>>No. You need to learn about your country's war powers and how >>>>much of your peacetime freedoms were suspended during WWII. >>> >>>Nonsense. >>> >>>How about an example ? >> >>Food coupons. > > > In exactly what meaningful way is that a loss of 'freedom' ? > > Rationing continued after the war btw. We provided lots of Care Packages to "starving Europe."
From: jmfbahciv on 31 Jan 2007 09:10 In article <anqvr2p132u7rcq2rrma8jrq9viuhuu2ec(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Tue, 30 Jan 07 13:31:45 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >>If you make each system you sell by hand, that, by definition, >>is extremely expensive. > > > All PCs are made "by hand". > > Dell makes EACH custom PC by hand, ON an ASSENBLY LINE. It is STILL >THEIR product, even though they buy their motherboards and graphics >cards, etc. from other VENDORS, the final product they sell is THEIR >PRODUCT. > >Now GTFU. When I said "by hand", I meant physically knitted by women's hands. No machines involved. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 31 Jan 2007 09:13 In article <RfqdnYHXoq0YMyLYRVnyjQA(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:epnhp6$8qk_008(a)s827.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... <snip> >Is that why you have ignored the rest of the comments and questions people >have directed towards you? I ignore most of the posts where you have tried to rewrite what I wrote. Eeyore has fallen for your tricks but not many others have. /BAH
From: Eeyore on 31 Jan 2007 09:22 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>> > >>>>Now implement the production line that is so perfect all leaks > >>>>can't get out. > >>> > >>>It shouldn't be the job of the production line. > >> > >> Think about it. The production line has to be designed so > >> that the process doesn't leave any seam untoned. > > > >OP's designs never see line level production. > > Possibly. It's not clear since he talks like a tech. Most > in this working category don't know how the rest of the > company works. Good Lord ! You're startlingly ignorant of modern manufacturing. Graham
From: Eeyore on 31 Jan 2007 09:25
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Compliance testing is routine these days. > >> > >> Not really. > > > >Yes it is. Most developed countries now require EMC compliance on all > >electrical and electronic products. It's a modestly large business. > > > >> I have to unplug my stove to listen to AM radio. > > > >Then your stove is very likely non-compliant with modern standards. > > It is a new stove. Then there's something seriously amiss. > > >> > > >> >> Now implement the production line that is so perfect all leaks > >> >> can't get out. > >> > > >> >It shouldn't be the job of the production line. > >> > >> Think about it. The production line has to be designed so > >> that the process doesn't leave any seam untoned. > > > >Good design means good design for production too. There should be no 'fiddly > >bits' requiring excessive labour to 'fettle'. > > This all costs oodles of money. No it doesn't. > To recover those costs, each > system has to have an inflated price that will pay for all costs > plus some. It costs almost nothing to design something well. In fact it can cost less than designing something badly. The methods required for good EMC performance are mostly simply 'good practice'. Graham |