Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: MassiveProng on 31 Jan 2007 19:47 On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 02:44:10 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> Gave us: >MassiveProng wrote: > >> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:02:30 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> >> Gave us: >> >> >>>Text Medium No. 5 wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Hail Eris! On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:50:21 +0000, T Wake jabbered inanely: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>Our "British friends" are so brainwashed they not only don't realize >>>>>>>they are, but they can no longer think for themselves any longer. The >>>>>>>immediate kneejerk is to make the USA their whipping boy. >>>>>> >>>>>>And their counterparts across the English Channel are worse. I don't >>>>>>expect them to do a damned thing about Iran's atomic bombs. They will >>>>>>continue to hole meetings, eat lobster, swill champaign, until it's too >>>>>>late...again. >>>>> >>>>>This is what we like to see. If you dont know what you are talking about >>>>>throw in some insults and a bit of fear. >>>>> >>>>>Well done. >>>> >>>> >>>>"Iran's atomic bombs." As if. Wingnuts... >>>> >>> >>>The Iranians are a good bit smarter than you are. >> >> >> They had all their smarts handed to them. They would be nothing and >> nowhere without outside assistance. > >A tinknocker would know. Interesting that once plowed under, this is all that surfaces. I knew that was all you amounted to. You are the piece of tin I knocked, and you are corroding. I would not even have to do anything, and you would still corrode away.
From: MassiveProng on 31 Jan 2007 19:50 On Wed, 31 Jan 07 12:43:00 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >In article <45BCCD5F.522D3C01(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>> > >>> >No. If you go around opening the cage door on rabid pitbulls, you are >>> >responsible for people getting bitten. >>> >>> I'm glad you agree with me about keeping these types locked up. >> >>It doesn't have to mean physically locked up. > >With today's transportation technology, it does. There is no >Australia-type piece of land to keep them from making messes >in other peoples' backyards. OMG you're a NIMBY twit as well.
From: MassiveProng on 31 Jan 2007 19:56 On Wed, 31 Jan 07 13:51:28 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >In article <45BF4AF7.6D3EA07(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> I don't expect them to do a damned thing about Iran's atomic >>> bombs. >> >>Iran has no atomic bombs. > >The news was reported that Iran started up their >centrifuges this week. > >Just out of curiosity, do you keep a stick of TNT from blowing >up by pulling the lit fuse when the fire is 1/4" away from >the stick or by storing the fuses and the sticks in separate >buildings? > >/BAH A much better analogy would be to ask: How does one extinguish an oil well head fire? This is the type of solution that each facility needs. Bada Boom... Bada Big Boom -The Fifth Element You destroy one asset to gain control over and thereby keep another from causing a problem.
From: Eeyore on 31 Jan 2007 20:07 unsettled wrote: > T Wake wrote: > > "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message > >>Eeyore wrote: > >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>> > >>>>I'll talk about the fighting that happened under Truman after WWII. > >>>>AT that time, none of the European free countries were in any > >>>>position to wage the coming fights that were to be called the > >>>>Cold War. Yet these same countries did not want Communism to > >>>>spread. So the US was the only country who had enough resources > >>>>to lead and do most of the supplying. > >>> > >>> > >>>It was the USA who was most concerned about communism spreading and it > >>>wasn't happening in Europe either. > > History shows otherwise. In exactly what way ? Graham
From: MassiveProng on 31 Jan 2007 20:09
On Wed, 31 Jan 07 14:06:51 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >In article <kmrvr2172te9al1coe976aud3bb3s82j30(a)4ax.com>, > MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >>On Tue, 30 Jan 07 15:34:36 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >> >>>>Compliance testing is routine these days. >>> >>>Not really. I have to unplug my stove to listen to AM radio. >> >> >> What exactly do you attribute that to? >> >>Hint: >> >> It isn't your radio, and it isn't the stove. >> >> If you want to learn something, just ask. > >1. Turn radio on to an AM station. >2. Plug in stove. >3. All radio AM stations have interference; most stations can >no longer be heard. >4. Unplug stove. AM station interference clears up immediately. > >Experiment is 100% reproducible. I never said it wasn't. The question is how much of what is taking place are you actually able to properly observe? > I don't need error bars. But you ARE error bars. And you think the culprit is? I'll clue you. One thing is the AM band on the radio. Very susceptible to AC wiring, and AC driven appliances. The other IS your house wiring. The stove should not "do" what it is doing, so I suspect your house wiring. Particularly since you don't even have any burners running on the stove. If you want good AM reception, you need a good loop antenna. That will keep the reception constant. Otherwise you have a serious issue with your house wiring. We're talking femtowatts here. You can modify reception by merely standing differently on the AM band. Since you were unaware of how manufacturing works, I can't expect you to know electronics. |