Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Y.Porat on 7 Oct 2006 05:46 Michael A. Terrell wrote: > T Wake wrote: > > > > Don't you have some circuit boards to play with? > > > I don't play with them, I either repair them, or scrap them. They go > into free computers that are given away to other disabled Veterans. I > am on usenet on another computer while I work on the donated computers, > when I can work. > > > -- > Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to > prove it. > Member of DAV #85. > > Michael A. Terrell > Central Florida ------------------------------ dont beleive a single word of T.Wake he is a disturbed gangster and a pathologic lier and a 'PHD of cosmology' so let him speak about thje influence of cosmologic radiation- on the balls of the goat Y.Porat -----------------------------------
From: T Wake on 7 Oct 2006 06:40 "Y.Porat" <maporat(a)012.net.il> wrote in message news:1160214389.832663.225030(a)m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... > > Michael A. Terrell wrote: >> T Wake wrote: >> > >> > Don't you have some circuit boards to play with? >> >> >> I don't play with them, I either repair them, or scrap them. They go >> into free computers that are given away to other disabled Veterans. I >> am on usenet on another computer while I work on the donated computers, >> when I can work. >> >> >> -- >> Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to >> prove it. >> Member of DAV #85. >> >> Michael A. Terrell >> Central Florida > ------------------------------ > dont beleive a single word of T.Wake I suspect the dont. > he is a disturbed gangster and a pathologic lier And you are still stalking me. Were you upset I was ignoring your nonsense in other threads? > and a 'PHD of cosmology' > so let him speak about > thje influence of cosmologic radiation- on the balls of the goat Well, sadly, you are a good example of how Jews are not all intelligent.
From: jmfbahciv on 7 Oct 2006 05:43 In article <wMGdnU0OlJ5E6rvYnZ2dnUVZ8qKdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:eg56q0$8ss_006(a)s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <45253DEE.896AC21A(a)earthlink.net>, >> "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>> Sure. That's local politics and wonderful to use as smoke and >>>> mirrors to distract your attention from the real threats. >>>> >>>> /BAH >>> >>> >>> Local? I guess you don't keep up with the news. >> >> All politics is local. The subject we were talking about >> is national security. If the Democrats, who are campaigning >> for office, talk about dirty words in emails when they meet >> with their voters, they don't have to describe what they >> are going to do about the national threat. > >What national threat? > >Do you mean the Islamic based terrorist who cause almost insignifcant loss >of life when compared to (for example) obesity? > >> The one running >> for governor here keeps harping about what our current governor >> didn't do. However, when asked what would he have done, he >> leaves the meeting. >> >> It's a tactic not to address the issue of the threats to our >> national security. > >The counter tactic is to over exaggerate the threat from one sector to mask >other problems. After reading your response and the others', there is no way anybody can do mess prevention until one is made and is too big to clean up. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 7 Oct 2006 05:48 In article <zuWdnToy_6qB6rvYRVnytA(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:eg5e55$8qk_007(a)s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <452633ED.B02A967A(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> another possibility is >>>> >> the goal is to cede to these extremists >>>> > >>>> >Are you really that monumentally stupid ? >>>> > >>>> >Listening to their greivances isn't 'ceding' btw. >>>> >>>> Arafat used this tactic. He kept people at the table talking >>>> about peace to give his side time to accumulate weapons. He >>>> even got all these rich countries to fund his efforts. >>> >>>You're suggesting that because one person did this then we must never >>>again listen ? That's a very blinkered view indeed. >> >> It is a tactic that worked. > >Is it? Has Israel ceased to exist now? Those people have not acquired an instant gratification addiction. They think in terms of decades and centuries. Arafat got billions of dollars by talking peace while actually doing the opposite. > >> Don't you think others will try >> the same thing if it succeeds in fooling all of the Democrats >> all of the time? > >Logical fallacy. Apparently. > >>>You can't change attitudes with bullets. >> >> My attitude changed. And the trigger was two little airplane >> missles. >> > >Yet, you think doing the same to the other side will change their attitude >in a different manner? Ok, that makes sense. Not little missles. Clinton lobbed a couple of little missles and it didn't stop them. These people do not care who nor how many die. It is their stated goal to kill millions. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 7 Oct 2006 05:50
In article <4526B105.12FC91D9(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >Listening to their greivances isn't 'ceding' btw. >> >> >> >> Arafat used this tactic. He kept people at the table talking >> >> about peace to give his side time to accumulate weapons. He >> >> even got all these rich countries to fund his efforts. >> > >> >You're suggesting that because one person did this then we must never >> >again listen ? That's a very blinkered view indeed. >> >> It is a tactic that worked. Don't you think others will try >> the same thing if it succeeds in fooling all of the Democrats >> all of the time? > >So you're not going to listen to anyone you disagree with ? My, you certainly do have a habit of leaping from one premise into a orthogonal conclusion. /BAH |