Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: JoeBloe on 7 Oct 2006 07:48 On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:05:23 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:sludi21v218aau83uue1nhpk001333skb4(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 19:26:17 +0100, "T Wake" >> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >> >>>Sadly, you are a... >> >> Sadly, you are still no more than an idiot. > >IKYABWAI. > >Even being an idiot I am orders of magnitude above you. > Only on the idiot ranking board.
From: jmfbahciv on 7 Oct 2006 06:46 In article <4_idnbX0z-W0FLrYRVny2w(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:eg7t54$8qk_003(a)s968.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <zuWdnToy_6qB6rvYRVnytA(a)pipex.net>, >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>news:eg5e55$8qk_007(a)s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>>> In article <452633ED.B02A967A(a)hotmail.com>, >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> another possibility is >>>>>> >> the goal is to cede to these extremists >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Are you really that monumentally stupid ? >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Listening to their greivances isn't 'ceding' btw. >>>>>> >>>>>> Arafat used this tactic. He kept people at the table talking >>>>>> about peace to give his side time to accumulate weapons. He >>>>>> even got all these rich countries to fund his efforts. >>>>> >>>>>You're suggesting that because one person did this then we must never >>>>>again listen ? That's a very blinkered view indeed. >>>> >>>> It is a tactic that worked. >>> >>>Is it? Has Israel ceased to exist now? >> >> Those people have not acquired an instant gratification addiction. >> They think in terms of decades and centuries. > >So sying it "worked" is inappropriate, "working" is as much as you can >assume. Even then it is tenuous as the working / not working argument has >equal support. > >> Arafat got billions >> of dollars by talking peace while actually doing the opposite. >>> >>>> Don't you think others will try >>>> the same thing if it succeeds in fooling all of the Democrats >>>> all of the time? >>> >>>Logical fallacy. >> >> Apparently. >>> >>>>>You can't change attitudes with bullets. >>>> >>>> My attitude changed. And the trigger was two little airplane >>>> missles. >>>> >>> >>>Yet, you think doing the same to the other side will change their attitude >>>in a different manner? Ok, that makes sense. >> >> Not little missles. Clinton lobbed a couple of little missles and >> it didn't stop them. These people do not care who nor how many >> die. It is their stated goal to kill millions. > >Who is this they of which you speak? Islamic extremists. Bin Laden has declared it. Iran has declared this goal. Clerics wish to remove all vestiges of Western civilzation; this includes no freedom of the press, TV and probably all computers (anything with a picture of a human being), all women in chattel (this is 50% of the labor force), public schools will shut down, private property will no longer be allowed, banks will be closed so trade will have to revert back to person-to-person bartering. /BAH
From: JoeBloe on 7 Oct 2006 08:02 On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:19:05 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:h1vdi2t5quk2uvbtcogbq0nburnajq4356(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:09:43 +0100, "T Wake" >> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >> >>> >>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>>news:pabbi21hj1om31j3avpn3mm32vdur9mo0n(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:22:17 -0400, Keith <krw(a)att.bizzzz> Gave us: >>>> >>>>>You're in a fantasy land. ONE SENTENCE of the NIE report was >>>>>leaked by the Democrats to try to discredit Bush. The four pages >>>>>around that one sentence, later released, say exactly the opposite. >>>>>Please get your "news" from someone other than Franken. >>>> >>>> Good one. >>> >>>Sycophant. >>> >> Agreeing with someone does NOT make me a sycophant, you Usenet total >> retard. > >No, it doesn't. There are lots of people here I agree with. Because you cant >see the different, it makes you an idiotic sycophant. > You declaring that I can't see or know something has all the markings of the oldest type of troll in Usenet. They were wrong then, and you are wrong now, troll boy.
From: JoeBloe on 7 Oct 2006 08:03 On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:18:20 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >JoeBloe wrote: > >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:37:00 +0100, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >> >> >At this level he's really a closet Islamist. >> >> You're a goddamned idiot. > >You've given it away now ! LOL. I thought as much. > >What was your last nym ? > The punctuation has NO space, idiot!
From: JoeBloe on 7 Oct 2006 08:06
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:17:12 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us: > >"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >news:wo6dnaYdAMyDh7nYRVny3w(a)pipex.net... >> >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> news:efvu0c$8ss_002(a)s811.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> >>> Well, I'd like to have a few less crapolas posts so I can find >>> the ones were posted by thoughtful people. >> >> Reasonable enough wish, although it carries the risk that you only read >> posts which say things you already agree with.... Always seems kind of >> pointless to me. > >Seems that's what most people in this discussion want...and if you don't >give it to them, they'll swear at you, insult you, and even threaten >physical violence and assault. I have learned a lot from the few >*reasonable* posters in this thread, both those I agree with *and* those I >don't...and there are even a few people in the discussion with whom I >disagree but they still showed respect for my opinion. It's too bad that >everyone else is so insecure in themselves and their views that the >slightest difference of opinion brings obscenity, insults and threats of >violence instead of healthy discussion. > There have been no threats made in this thread, dumbfuck. |