Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: John Larkin on 11 Oct 2006 11:57 On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:20:38 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam(a)nospam.com> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:08:09 -0700, the renowned John Larkin >> <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>>The rooms at the Inn at Spanish Bay start at about $550, and europeans >>>are a glut there, too. But you can sit on the deck, overlooking the >>>ocean, next to a cozy open-air firepit, sipping a Guinness, and the >>>burger and fries are excellent. If you get chilly, they'll bring you >>>blankets. Golf is an insane activity, but golf resorts are almost >>>always a great place to stay. >>> >>>John >> > >What a bunch of hedonistic SH_T! Anyone who would indulge their self in >such sissy-sh_t comfort should be shot dead... We didn't stay there, we just hiked in for a beer and a burger on the deck. We stayed at a Hilton in Monterey, close to Laguna Seca where our friend was racing his spec car. But spending a couple of kilobucks on a vacation isn't unreasonable. Staying at a beautiful resort on the Pacific dunes seems a lot nicer than me as compared to, say, a Princess cruise. Personally, I like to hike or ski, the only sort of all-day, tiring activities that take me away from electronics. If I lay on a beach or something passive like that, I just keep thinking. What do you do for fun? John
From: John Fields on 11 Oct 2006 12:37 On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:46:04 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Larkin wrote: > >> It's not that big a leap... >> >> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061010/ts_nm/security_qaeda_libi_dc_2 > >Why are you so fixated on utter loonies ? --- I don't know about Larkin, but I find your behavior fascinating. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Eeyore on 11 Oct 2006 12:48 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >> >> > >> >> What assumptions? Islamic extremists wish to kill me and mine? > >> >> They've told me so. Furthermore, their statements were not > >> >> empty threats; they demonstrated their intent. > >> > > >> >No, they did nothing of the kind. They demonstrated their intent to > >> >destroythree or four buildings. It's a huge leap of faith (i.e., > assumption) > >> > to extrapolate from this that they are "intent to destroy all traces of > >> >Western civilization." > >> > >> Which word do you have troubles with meaning: World, Trade, or Center? > > > >Like he said. A few buildings. > > Do have any idea the trade that was going on inside them? > There were whole companies wiped out. These people had > a collective knowledge about trading and how to get it done > that could not be duplicated overnight. No-one's irreplaceable. Graham
From: Eeyore on 11 Oct 2006 12:50 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>So why aren't we devoting all our resources to getting him? > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> Because this intent to destroy all traces of Western civilization > >>> >>>> is not isolated to one human being. > >>> >>> > >>> >>>Where do you *get* these assumptions??? > >>> >> > >>> >> What assumptions? Islamic extremists wish to kill me and mine? > >>> >> They've told me so. Furthermore, their statements were not > >>> >> empty threats; they demonstrated their intent. > >>> > > >>> >No, they did nothing of the kind. They demonstrated their intent to > >>> >destroy three or four buildings. It's a huge leap of faith (i.e., > assumption) > >>> >toextrapolate from this that they are "intent to destroy all traces of > >>> >Western civilization." > >>> > >>> Which word do you have troubles with meaning: World, Trade, or Center? > >> > >> Like he said. A few buildings. > > > >....that just happened to be the highest buildings on the NYC skyline--i.e., > >the easiest to hit, and the most visible to destroy. > > > >I could build a building called The Restaurant at the End of the Universe, > >and that doesn't mean that a terrorist that knocks it down would be intent > >on destroying all restaurants and universes. They're just buildings with > >names. > > > >BAH's condescension aside, I am willing to concede that knocking down the > >two biggest World Trade Center buildings probably was symbolic of their > >dislike of Western society. However, it is a *huge* leap of faith (i.e., > >assumption) to go from knocking down two buildings as an act of dislike, to > >an "intent to destroy all traces of Western Civilization." It's exactly > >these giant leaps that the US public must not let the Bush Administration > >and his party get away with, in the name of using fear to hold onto control > >of the country. I will once again remind you that the US government has > >changed our lifestyle post 9/11 *far* more than the terrorists have. > > You people keep focusing on the buildings. Why don't you spend > a nanosecond thinking about the people who were killed, the > trade that was interrupted and the destruction of the > knowledge of how to do all this stuff? Like I said. Ppl are replaceable. > This includes data bases > such as orders, invoices, names, dates, phone numbers, contacts. Any competent organisation will have these backed up offsite. Graham
From: Daniel Mandic on 11 Oct 2006 12:57
Eeyore wrote: > JoeBloe wrote: > > > Since we have yet to prove that any aliens exist, or any life > > outside this world, I'd say that anyone on the planet can safely > > assert that NYC IS the center of the known universe and has been > > for many many decades. > > Bwahahahahahahahhah /me joining in singing and laughing.... Best Regards, Daniel Daniel P.S.: Pffft.. 'Schwechater. Recht hat er...' (flash flash... Commercial Break) |