Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: lucasea on 16 Oct 2006 00:18 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:snd5j21prd6oopjn8i1j3u030t9h33hpcj(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:38:12 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>Isn't that the case for everyone? Doesn't everyone have to define their >>own >>ethical compass? >> > Hahahahaha! That's rich. Don't worry, Joe. Nobody would ever accuse you of defining your own ethical compass. That would require you having a cogent thought of your own. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 16 Oct 2006 00:21 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:g0j5j290lk66o0u5fa38sgutulmnans2et(a)4ax.com... > They MIGHT send me an e-mail reminding me to review the TOS. So now you finally admit that you are obliged to abide by the TOS. Now we're finally making progress. > They also know that freedom of speech carries a lot of weight in > this land, and that they could end up on the wrong end of a huge, > costly suit. That's *hilarious* coming from you. I've never met anybody whose words and actions are less aligned with freedom of speech--especially from anybody who might even *think* of questioning the braindead dogma that you have swallowed and regurgitate regularly here. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 16 Oct 2006 00:27 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:c3f5j2di76enggbaabefl3js2mo5570n4f(a)4ax.com... > > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:18:44 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >>and the USA would have been seen as liberating heroes. > > We were, you retarded fuckhead. And most Iraqis have said they would rather not have the brand of "liberation" that we rained down on their heads. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 16 Oct 2006 00:28 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:roi5j210k0sd0nh9s4elqkb53a63efeka0(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:11:38 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >> >>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>news:c3f5j2di76enggbaabefl3js2mo5570n4f(a)4ax.com... >>> >>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:18:44 +0100, Eeyore >>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >>> >>>>and the USA would have been seen as liberating heroes. >>> >>> We were, you retarded fuckhead. >> >>Really? Who by? >> > All of Kuwait, for one. > > I would also point to the day Saddam's statue was felled. Or do you > think all those Iraqis cheering were paid for? Uh...yeah, it's a well-documented fact that that was staged. You *really* do need to start thinking for yourself sometime. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 16 Oct 2006 00:33
"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:rvc5j2dlfhbk4lpo0ec1324af8p2o2v9hi(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:03:52 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >>You never responded to my question about your alignment with global >>cartels. >>As your attitude and posting signal you are indeed so aligned, I will >>assume >>your lack of response means yes. > > --- > Not necessarily. > > I don't generally read your posts since you seem to be nominally > sensible and reading _all_ the posts in this thread is tiresome. > > Also, sometimes I read a post and disagree with it, but just don't > want to be bothered with answering it and starting another long > harangue. Sure seems that the posts you conveniently happen to either "miss" or "don't want to be bothered with answering" are the ones where you don't have a defense for an untenable position. Eric Lucas |