Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: lucasea on 16 Oct 2006 00:41 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:tap5j2psnejkll5a3eukt2i6ft03brc7ng(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 01:20:08 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >> >> >>JoeBloe wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:47:22 +0100, "T Wake" >>> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >>> >>> >Really? I seem to recall the British Empire went on to become quite >>> >large >>> >and successfull while your nation was trying to expand. >>> >>> You mean "colonization"? Yeah... that is what resulted in slavery >>> here, as well as apartheid in S. Africa, as well as the need for a >>> person like Ghandi to take a stand. We won't even mention the opium >>> trade, or the dens that existed in London even right up into the last >>> century. >> >>Britain ended slavery about 100 years ( or more ? ) before the USA. >> > It was a british mindset that started it over here, dipshit. Your moral relativism is showing. It was the people who bought and used slaves that started the slave trade here. Eric Lucas
From: JoeBloe on 16 Oct 2006 00:43 On 15 Oct 2006 21:09:43 -0700, "sooofisticated" <sooofisticated(a)yahoo.com> Gave us: >Gehe... snipped retarded baby bullshit. You are about as sophisticated as a freshly laid pile of stool.
From: lucasea on 16 Oct 2006 00:47 "Jamie" <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_(a)charter.net> wrote in message news:QNyYg.25$3K6.15(a)newsfe02.lga... > > JoeBlow has friends :) The sycophant has sycophants. Kewl! Eric Lucas
From: JoeBloe on 16 Oct 2006 00:49 On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 04:21:24 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:g0j5j290lk66o0u5fa38sgutulmnans2et(a)4ax.com... > >> They MIGHT send me an e-mail reminding me to review the TOS. > >So now you finally admit that you are obliged to abide by the TOS. Now >we're finally making progress. Nope. Never signed it. Read it again, dipshit. I said they might send me an e-mail. I didn't say anything about it other than that. In fact, it would be an automated e-mail. Nice try thought. > > >> They also know that freedom of speech carries a lot of weight in >> this land, and that they could end up on the wrong end of a huge, >> costly suit. > >That's *hilarious* coming from you. I've never met anybody whose words and >actions are less aligned with freedom of speech--especially from anybody who >might even *think* of questioning the braindead dogma that you have >swallowed and regurgitate regularly here. Instant karma's gonna get you. Knock you right off your brain, which you always seem to be sitting on.
From: JoeBloe on 16 Oct 2006 00:51
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 04:27:41 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:c3f5j2di76enggbaabefl3js2mo5570n4f(a)4ax.com... >> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:18:44 +0100, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >> >>>and the USA would have been seen as liberating heroes. >> >> We were, you retarded fuckhead. > >And most Iraqis have said they would rather not have the brand of >"liberation" that we rained down on their heads. > So now you know what "most Iraqis have said"? Bullshit, little boy. You know nothing about it, and that remark proves it. |