Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 16 Oct 2006 02:01 JoeBloe wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >Jamie wrote: > >> Eeyore wrote: > > >> > Apparently Joe's not that familiar with N Korea ! Or electricity ! > >> > > >> > Graham > >> > > >> and, you are ? > > > >I know something about it which he clearly doesn't. > > > >Click on the link. Where are the lights ? > >http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/10/koreaREU121006_548x700.jpg > > That's what happens, when, in one's communistic stubbornness, one > finds one's self 300 years behind the rest of the world. So you agree with me ? > Are we > supposed to just hand them everything, even though they do NOT > participate in the world economy, nor peaceful governing of their > peoples, much less academics or science? No. > Being modern is not free. Eh ? > Get a clue, dipshit. Grow up. Graham
From: Eeyore on 16 Oct 2006 02:02 JoeBloe wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 01:20:08 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >Britain ended slavery about 100 years ( or more ? ) before the USA. > > It was a british mindset that started it over here, dipshit. Britain ended slavery about 100 years ( or more ? ) before the USA. What was stopping you ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 16 Oct 2006 02:04 JoeBloe wrote: > Why don't we ask someone like Steven Biko... Oh... that's right... > we can't. You bastards murdered him. Absolutely *nothing* to do with Britain, the Empire or whatever. Have you never heard of the RSA ? Republic of South Africa. An independent country. Graham
From: Eeyore on 16 Oct 2006 02:05 JoeBloe wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >JoeBloe wrote: > > > >> I would also point to the day Saddam's statue was felled. Or do you > >> think all those Iraqis cheering were paid for? > > > >They were cheering the fall of Saddam not the US troops. > > So our facilitating said fall was merely coincidental? I'm sure it was quite convenient at the time. Graham
From: Eeyore on 16 Oct 2006 02:08
John Larkin wrote: > Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote: > > >With the US behaving the way it is, I'd wonder if the Europeans would > >bite at the chance to field an independent force sufficiently funded > >to balance US behavior and provide the necessary 'encouragements' so > >the US negotiates no longer as an unopposed bully. > > But if it takes a multi-country concensus to act, they won't be > fielded in time to do much useful. You can't "balance US behavior" if > it takes a year of debating before deployment. We've been working on a 'rapid deployment force'. Graham |