From: unsettled on
Eeyore wrote:

>
> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>
>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>So all you're doing here is criticising the failings of your current system.
>>>Quite so. It needs radical overhaul.
>>
>>To go to a single payer system implies an expansion of the Medicare
>>system. So a national health insurer will not work well.
>
>
> The use of the word *so* implies some cause-effect relationship which you have
> failed to show. I'm sorry but simple assertions based on political doctrine count
> for nought.
>
>
>
>>Congress even did something sensible and passed an extraordinary
>>insurance. The youngsteres who ran AARP caused their subscribers
>>to get it repealed.
>
>
> I know nothing about this.
>
>
>
>>>It's rare here to find a doctor who *doesn't* do NHS work.
>>
>>Is his license tied to volunteering?
>
>
> Licence ? You mean his qualification as a doctor. That's dealt with by the BMA (
> British Medical Association ) as it always has been.
>
> Most doctors here simply work for the NHS since it's the largest health care
> employer in the land. There's no compulsion to do so and you can work in private
> practice to or even both, just like any other job.

The short answer to the question is that you don't know.


From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> In article <454B962A.4DD0FD81(a)hotmail.com>,
> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I believe there may even be shopping malls in China now too !
>
> There were when I was there. They were only for the tourists.

That'll soon change if not already so. I'll bet there are some in places like
Shanghai for example....

Jing An District People's Square (Ren Min Guang Chang), a large park, affords a
peaceful oasis in the middle of hectic downtown. Also a cultural stopover, it is
the site of the impressively designed Shanghai Museum and the Shanghai Grand
Theater. Underground, beneath the park, lies a shopping mall that proves popular
with the young and trendy. For those who crave more gaudy fun, check the Great
World Entertainment Center with karaoke, Beijing Opera, acrobatics and more.

Nan Jing Road stretches east to west through Shanghai's commercial section. On
the western side stands the massive Shanghai Center, a multi-complex that houses
the Portman Ritz-Carlton Hotel, commercial businesses, consulates and a shopping
mall. On the eastern side, a stretch of Nan Jing Road has been converted into a
pedestrian-only area. This section has held the commercial center since the
1930s, as you might tell from the commercial signs that have sprouted almost
organically since then. Once Shanghai's major shopping street, Nan Jing's glory
faded somewhat with the advent of Huai Hai Road, but it still proves worth
visiting--especially at night in its full, neon-lit glory.

http://www3.oag.com/Cities/CityHome?cat=0&city=79

>
> >I wonder if BAH and unsettled still think the Chinese all go round still in
> >Mao style suits ?
>
> Only the old ones dressed that way when I was there.

Indeed.

Graham

From: unsettled on
Eeyore wrote:

>
> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>
>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Yeah, so? That bitterness is a good summary of those peoples' personal
>>>experiences. How does that invalidate the study?
>>
>>The conclusions from the data showed the opposite.
>
>
> Eh ? Do explain what you mean.

BAH explained it. You snipped the context and came back
with this "Eeyore is stupid, please explain it again"
thing you do all the time.

The problem, simply stated, is that the way questions
were asked in the poll prevented the people's actual
feelings from being heard.

I provided this book for you to read earlier in this
thread. You need to educate yourself in such matters
because based on your responses it is apparent you're
not qualified to engage in the conversations you're
embroiled in:

_The Illusion of Public Opinion: Fact and Artifact in
American Public Opinion Polls_ by George F. Bishop

It is available at amazon.com for as little as $15.35.

From: Eeyore on


unsettled wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
>
> > I'm simply pointing out the factual reasons for the 1973 oil embargo.
> >
> > Do you want to rewrite history ?
>
> No, I'd like for the likes of you to breathe, live in,
> and support the culture in which you live.

Since I do that just fine right now I don't need your help then do I ?

Graham


From: Eeyore on


unsettled wrote:

> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
> > I've been telling that the Democrat leadership are insane.
>
> It is an appeasement repeat taken from from Britain's
> history at the early stages of WW1 and WW2. We can't
> defend liberty by appeasing those who would end it.

You think there was appeasement before / during WW1 ?

You have some funny ideas.

Graham